Spinal cord stimulation for medically refractory Angina Pectoris: Can the therapy be resuscitated?

Neuromodulation

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-5

  Levy, Robert M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY STENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; NEUROMODULATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REIMBURSEMENT; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION;

ANGINA PECTORIS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79251570221     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00325.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Jitta DJ, DeJongste MJ, Kliphuis CM, Staal MJ,. Multi-morbidity, the predominant predictor of quality-of-life, following successful spinal cord stimulation for angina pectoris. Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 1.
2. Ekre O, Eliasson T, Norrsell H, Währborg P, Mannheimer C,. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation and coronary artery bypass grafting on quality of life and survival in the ESBY study. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1938-1945.
3. Eddicks S, Maier-Hauff K, Schenk M, Müller A, Baumann G, Theres H,. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study. Heart 2007; 93: 585-590.
4. Hautvast RW, DeJongste MJ, Staal MJ, van Gilst WH, Lie KI,. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic intractable angina pectoris: a randomized, controlled efficacy study. Am Heart J 1998; 136: 1114-1120.
5. Andréll P, Ekre O, Eliasson T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris-long-term results from the ESBY study. Cardiology 2003; 99: 20-24.
6. Di Pede F, Lanza GA, Zuin G, et al. Investigators of the prospective Italian registry of SCS for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 951-955.
7. Andréll P, Yu W, Gersbach P, Gillberg L, Pehrsson K, Hardy I,. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris-results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL). Heart 2010; 96: 1132-1136.
8. TenVaarwerk IA, Jessurun GA, DeJongste MJ, et al. Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris. The Working Group on Neurocardiology. Heart 1999; 82: 82-88.
9. Börjesson M, Andrell P, Lundberg D, Mannheimer C,. Spinal cord stimulation in severe angina pectoris-a systematic review based on the Swedish Council on Technology assessment in health care report on long-standing pain. Pain 2008; 140: 501-508.
10. Taylor RS, De Vries J, Buchser E, DeJongste MJ,. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2009; 9: 13.
11. Hemingway H, Langenberg C, Damant J, Frost C, Pyorala K, Barrett-Connor E,. Prevalence of angina in women versus men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international variations across 31 countries. Circulation 2008; 117: 1526-1536.
12. Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC joint study group on the treatment of refractory angina. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 355-370.
13. DeJongste MJL, Foreman BD,. Chaper 67. In:, Krames ES, Peckham PH, Rezai AR, eds. Textbook neuromodulation. London: Elsevier Ltd, 2009; 838.
14. Hautvast RW, Ter Horst GJ, DeJong BM, et al. Relative changes in regional blood flow during spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Eur J Neurosci 1997; 9: 1178-1183.
15. De Vries J, Anthonio RL, DeJongste MJ, et al. The effect of electrical neurostimulation on collateral perfusion during acute coronary occlusion. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2007; 7: 18.
16. Jessurun GA, Tio RA, de Jongste MJ, Hautvast RW, Den Heijer P, Crijns HJ,. Coronary blood flow dynamics during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for stable angina pectoris associated with severe narrowing of one major coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 921-926.
17. De Vries J, DeJongste MJ, Durenkamp A, Zijlstra F, Staal MJ,. The sustained benefits of long-term neurostimulation in patients with refractory chest pain and normal coronary arteries. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 360-365.
18. Vulink NCC, Overgaauw DM, Jessurun GAJ, et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation on quality of life in patients with therapeutically chronic refractory angina pectoris. Neuromodulation 1999; 2: 33-40.
19. DeJongste MJ, Haaksma J, Hautvast RW, Hillege HL, Meyler PW, Staal MJ,. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischaemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 413-418.
20. Andersen C, Hole P, Oxhoj H,. Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994; 71: 419-421.
21. Diedrichs H, Zobel C, Theissen P, et al. Symptomatic relief precedes improvement of myocardial blood flow in patients under spinal cord stimulation. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6: 7.
22. Mannheimer C, Augustinsson LE, Carlsson CA, Manhem K, Wilhelmsson C,. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 56-61.
23. McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1048-1053.