Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 124-140

  Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby ^a   Bonnefous, Annabel Mauve ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NEOMA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

Climate change; Corporate strategy; Environmental policy; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CORPORATE STRATEGY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; NUCLEAR POWER; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UTILITY SECTOR;

EID: 79251560318     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.681     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ählström J, Macquet M, Richter U. 2009. The lack of a critical perspective in environmental management research: distortion in the scientific discourse. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 334-346.
2. Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). 2010. Annual Energy Outlook. United States Energy Information Administration. [28 February 2010].
3. Areva. 2009. The World Leader in Nuclear Energy. [28 February 2010].
4. Bandy J. 1996. Managing the other of nature: sustainability, spectacle, and global regimes of capital in ecotourism. Public Culture 8(3): 539-566.
5. Banerjee SB. 2000. Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders and colonial discourses: the case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organization and Environment 13(1): 3-38.
6. Banerjee SB. 2001. Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies 38(4): 489-513.
7. Banerjee SB. 2003. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies 24(1): 143-180.
8. Banerjee SB. 2008. Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology 34(1): 51-79.
9. Banerjee SB, Iyer ES, Kashyap RK. 2003. Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing 67(2): 106-122.
10. Bendell J, Kearins K. 2005. The political bottom line: the emerging dimension to corporate responsibility for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 372-383.
11. Bowie NE. 1999. Business Ethics: a Kantian Perspective. Blackwell: Oxford.
12. Bremmers H, Omta O, Kemp R, Haverkamp DJ. 2007. Do stakeholder groups influence environmental management system development in the Dutch agri-food sector? Business Strategy and the. Environment 16: 214-231.
13. British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL). 2009. Corporate Responsibility. [28 February 2010].
14. Clemens BW, Papadakis M. 2008. Environmental management and strategy in the face of regulatory intensity: radioactive contamination in the US steel industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 17: 480-492.
15. Collins E, Kearins K, Roper J. 2005. The risks of relying on stakeholder engagement for the achievement of sustainability. Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory 9(1). [25 February 2010].
16. DGEMP-DIREM. 2006. Les Principales Conclusions du 10ème Forum International de l'Énergie. Ministère de l'Ecologie, de l'Énergie, du Développement Durable et de la Mer: Paris. [28 February 2010].
17. Donaldson T. 1999. Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review 24: 237-241.
18. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative Social Contract Theory. Academy of Management Review 19(2): 252-284.
19. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.
20. Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index. 2009. [28 February 2010].
21. Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
22. Faber N, Jorna R, Engelen JV. 2005. The sustainability of 'sustainability': a study into the conceptual foundations of the notion of 'sustainability'. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 7(1): 1-33.
23. Freeman RE. 1984. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24: 233-236.
24. Giugni M. 2004. Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective. Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD.
25. Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4): 986-1014.
26. Henriques I, Sharma S. 2005. Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian Forestry Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 384-398.
27. Hill CWL, Jones TM. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies 29: 31-154.
28. Hoffman A. 2001. From Heresy to Dogma: an Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. Stanford University Press: Stanford.
29. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2008. [28 February 2010].
30. Kolk A. 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 1-15.
31. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 268-305.
32. Mitchell R, Agle B, Wood D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of whom and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853-886.
33. Norman W, Macdonald C. 2004. Getting to the bottom of 'triple bottom line'. Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2): 243-262.
34. Nuclear Energy Agency. 2008. [28 February 2010].
35. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24: 403-441.
36. Phillips RA. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 51-66.
37. Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2006. Strategy and society, the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12): 76-92.
38. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 97-118.
39. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 2001. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis 27-29: 215-237.
40. Prakash A, Kollman K. 2004. Policy modes, firms and the natural environment. Business Strategy and the Environment 13: 107-128.
41. Redclift M. 1987. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Methuen: London.
42. Shiva V. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics. Zed: London.
43. Solomon RC. 1994. Above the Bottom Line: an Introduction to Business Ethics. Harcourt Brace: Fort Worth, TX.
44. Steurer R. 2006. Mapping stakeholder theory anew: from the 'stakeholder theory of the firm' to three perspectives on business-society relations. Business Strategy and the Environment 15: 55-69.
45. Strauss A, Corbin J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
46. Ulhøi JP, Madsen H. 2009. Recapturing the corporate environmental management research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 79-82.
47. Welford R. 1998. Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 7(1): 1-12.
48. Wolf KD. 2008. Emerging patterns of global governance: the new interplay between the state, business and civil society. In Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, Scherer AG, Palazzo G (eds). Elgar: Sheffield; 225-248.
49. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2010. [28 February 2010].
50. World Commission for Economic Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press: New York.