Back pain outcomes in primary care following a practice improvement intervention:- A prospective cohort study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Breen, Alan C ^a   Carr, Eloise ^b   Langworthy, Jennifer E ^a   Osmond, Clive ^c   Worswick, Louise ^b  

^a ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BACK PAIN; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79251540249     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-28     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. J McBeth K Jones, Best Practice (Pubitemid 46972006)
2. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. N Maniadakis A Gray, Pain 2000 84 95 103 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6 10601677
3. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. KP Jordan UT Kadam R Hayward M Porcheret C Young P Croft, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010 11 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144
4. A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines. D Di Iorio E Henley A Doughty, Archives of Familiy Medicine 2000 9 1015 1021 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1015 (Pubitemid 32014694)
5. Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in the Netherlands. H Schers J Braspenning R Drijver M Wensing R Grol, British Journal of General Practice 2000 50 640 644 11042916 (Pubitemid 30628035)
6. Implementation Barriers for General Practice Guidlelines on Low Back Pain. H Schers M Wensing Z Huijsmans M van Tulder R Grol, Spine 2001 26 348 E353 10.1097/00007632-200108010-00013 11474367
7. Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. P Dey C Simpson S Collins G Hodgson C Dowrick A Simison M Rose, British Journal of General Practice 2004 54 33 37 14965404 (Pubitemid 38071839)
8. Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? a descriptive study. M Cranney E Warren S Barton K Gardner T Walley, Family Practice 2001 18 359 363 10.1093/fampra/18.4.359 11477041 (Pubitemid 32771637)
9. "You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain. A Breen H Austin C Campion-Smith E Carr E Mann, European Journal of Pain 2006 11 21 29 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006 16434220
10. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. JM Grimshaw RE Thomas G MacLennan C Fraser CR Ramsay L Vale P Whitty MP Eccles L Matowe L Shirran M Wensing R Dijkstra C Donaldson, Health Technology Assessments 2004 8 1 102
11. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Grimshaw M Eccles J Tetroe, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2004 24 31 S37 10.1002/chp.1340240506 15712775
12. Evaluation of a Physician Education Intervention to Improve Primary Care for Low-Back Pain II: Impact on Patients. D Cherkin R Deyo A Berg, Spine 1991 16 1173 1178 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00008 1836677
13. Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain. JM Schectman W.S Schroth D Verme JD Voss, J Gen Intern Med 2003 18 773 780 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10205.x 14521638 (Pubitemid 37281770)
14. Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low back pain - I. Impact of physicians. D Cherkin RA Deyo AO Berg JJ Bergman DM Lishner, Spine 1991 16 1168 1172 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00007 1836676
15. Implementation of the Dutch Low Back Pain Guideline for General Practitioners. AJ Engers M Wensing MW van Tulder A Timmermans RAB Oostendorp BW Koes R Grol, Spine 2005 30 595 600 10.1097/01.brs.0000155406.79479.3a
16. Efficiency of guidelines and educational program: a training process for the diagnosis of low back pain. L Fabiani S Goivannoni M Casanica M Scatigna R Pulsoni G Ventgriglia M Marchi, Recenti Prog Med 2004 95 81 86 15072392 (Pubitemid 38315915)
17. A call for action: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain. IB Scheel KB Hagen J Herrin AD Oxman, Spine 2002 27 561 566 10.1097/00007632-200203150-00002 11884902 (Pubitemid 34226112)
18. Evaluation of the Impact of a Low Back Pain Educational Intervention on Physicians' Practice Patterns and Patients' Outcomes. VJ Derebery GM Giang G Saracino WT Fogarty, Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2002 33 977 984
19. The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners. The UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) Randomized Trial. DW Evans AC Breen T Pincus J Sim M Underwood S Vogel NE Foster, Spine 2010 35 858 866 20308941
20. Content and outcome of usual primary care for back pain: a systematic review. S Somerville E Hay M Lewis J Barber D van der Windt J Hill G Sowden, British Journal of General Practice 2008 790 797 10.3399/bjgp08X319909 19000402
21. Do baseline characteristics predict response to treatment for low back pain? Secondary analysis of the UK BEAM dataset [ISRCTN32683578]. MR Underwood V Morton A Farrin on behalf of the U. K. Beam trial team, Rheumatology 2007 kem113 17522096
22. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. J Gabbay A le May, British Medical Journal 2004 329 1013 1017 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1013 15514347
23. The Dorset Seedcorn Project: interprofessional learning and continuous quality improvement in primary care. PM Wilcock C Campion-Smith M Head, British Journal of General Practice 2002 52 suppl 39 S44 12389771
24. RW Revans, ABC of Action Learning London: Lemos and Crane 1998
25. Effective learners in action learning sets. A Mumford, Journal of Workplace Learning 1996 8 3 10 10.1108/13665629610150126
26. A model for setting up interdisciplinary collaborative working in groups: lessons from an experience of action learning. S Douglas T Machin, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2004 11 189 193 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2003. 00707.x 15009495 (Pubitemid 38406346)
27. Experience of an action learning set. M Bell E Coen A Coyne-Nevin R Egenton A Ellis L Moran, Practice Development in Health Care 2007 6 232 241 10.1002/pdh.232
28. A framework to support social interaction in care homes. G Cook C Clarke, Nursing Older People 2010 22 16 21 20432782
29. Improving Health Care, Part 1: The Clinical Value Compass. EC Nelson JJ Mohr PB Batalden SK Plume, Journal on Quality Improvement 1996 22 243 256
30. Developing a clinical value compass to monitor urology outcomes at the Toronto East General Hospital. H Reuber A Blair, Healthcare Management Forum/Canadian College Of Health Service Executives=Forum Gestion Des Soins De Sante/College Canadien Des Directeurs De Services De Sante 2000 13 53 56 10947431
31. Medication reviews in the community:results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. L Sorensen J Stokes D Purdie M Woodward R Elliott M Roberts, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2004 58 648 664 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02220.x 15563363 (Pubitemid 39665152)
32. Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges. JE Smith DL Fisher JJ Endorf-Olson, The Joint Commission journal of quality improvement 2000 26 277 286
33. Continuous Quality Improvement for Patients with Back Pain. RA Deyo M Schall DM Berwick T Nolan P Carver, Journal of General Internal Medicine 2000 15 647 655 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90717.x 11029679
34. Chapter 3: European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. M van Tulder A Becker T Bekkering A Breen MT Del Real A Hutchinson B Koes E Laerum A Malmivaara on behalf of the COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care, Eur Spine J 2006 March 15 Supplement 2 169 s191 10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2
35. A study of the natural history of pack pain: Part I - development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. M Roland R Morris, Spine 1983 8 141 144 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 6222486 (Pubitemid 13089565)
36. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. RA Deyo, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988 69 1044 1053 2975164 (Pubitemid 19027328)
37. A 12-item short-form health survey. JE Ware M Kosinski SD Keller, Medical Care 1996 34 220 233 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 8628042
38. Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain:II. Impact on patients. D Cherkin RA Deyo AO Berg, Spine 1991 16 1173 1178 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00008 1836677
39. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. C Bombardier, Spine 2000 25 3100 3103 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003 11124724
40. Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change. RWJG Ostelo RA Deyo P Stratford G Waddell P Croft M Von Korff LM Bouter HC de Vet, Spine 2008 33 90 94 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10 18165753
41. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. G Waddell AK Burton, Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 2005 19 655 670 (Pubitemid 40790493)
42. Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients' and general practitioners' experiences and expectations of information for low back pain. A McIntosh C Shaw, Health Expectations 2003 6 19 29 10.1046/j.1369-6513. 2003.00197.x 12603625 (Pubitemid 36460040)
43. Effect of UK national guidelines on services to treat patients with acute low back pain: follow up questionnaire survey. AG Barnett MR Underwood MR Vickers, British Medical Journal 1999 318 919 920 10102859 (Pubitemid 29191930)
44. Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial. C Thompson AL Kinmonth L Stevens RC Peveler A Stevens KJ Ostler RM Pickering NG Baker A Henson J Preece D Cooper MJ Campbell, The Lancet 2000 355 185 191 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03171-2 (Pubitemid 30068217)
45. Effect of the asthma management guidelines on recruitment to a RCT of early introduction of inhaled steriods in asthma. SM Dennis MR Vickers CD Frost JF Price PJ Barnes, Thorax 1997 52 18
46. Co-ordination of Primary Health Care for Back Pain: a randomised controlled trial. M Rossignol L Abenhaim P Seguin A Neveu J-P Collet T Ducruet S Shapiro, Spine 2000 25 251 259 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00018 10685491 (Pubitemid 30084281)