Do female black field crickets Teleogryllus commodus benefit from polyandry?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1469-1477

  Jennions, M D ^a   Drayton, J M ^a   Brooks, R ^b   Hunt, J ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crickets; Genetic incompatibility; Multiple mating; Polyandry; Sexual selection; Sire effects; Sperm competition; Teleogryllus commodus

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; FEMALE; FITNESS; HATCHING; POLYANDRY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; HEXAPODA; TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS; TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS;

EID: 34250784497     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01333.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arnqvist, G. Nilsson, T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60 : 145 164.
2. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, R. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Baker, R.H., Ashwell, R.I.S., Richards, T.A., Fowler, K., Chapman, T. Pomiankowski, A. 2001. Effects of multiple mating and male eye span on female reproductive output in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. 12 : 732 739.
4. Bernasconi, G. Keller, L. 2001. Female polyandry affects their sons' reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 186 193.
5. Brown, W.D., Bjork, A., Schneider, K. Pitnick, S. 2004. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58 : 1242 1250.
6. Bussière, L.F., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R. 2006. Sexual conflict and cryptic female choice in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution 60 : 792 800.
7. Bybee, L.F., Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D., Campbell, K. Hanlon, C.C. 2005. Effects of single vs. multiple mates: monogamy results in increased fecundity for the beetle Phoracantha semipunctata. J. Insect Behav. 18 : 513 527.
8. Byrne, P.G. Rice, W.R. 2005. Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 1324 1331.
9. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Crawley, M.J. 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
11. Dunn, D.W., Sumner, J.P. Goulson, D. 2005. The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58 : 128 135.
12. Eady, P.E., Wilson, N. Jackson, M. 2001. Copulating with multiple mates enhances female fecundity but not egg-to-adult survival in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 54 : 2161 2165.
13. Engqvist, L. 2006. Females benefit from mating with different males in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata. Behav. Ecol. 17 : 435 440.
14. Evans, A.R. 1988. Mating systems and reproductive strategies in three Australian Gryllid crickets: Bobilla victoriae Otte, Balamara gidya Otte and Teleogryllus commodus (Walker) (OrthopteraL: Gryllidae; Nemobiinae; Trigonidiinae; Gryllinae). Ethology 78 : 21 52.
15. Evans, J.P. Magurran, A.E. 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 : 10074 10076.
16. Fedorka, K.M. Mousseau, T.A. 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim. Behav. 64 : 361 367.
17. Fisher, D.O., Double, M.C. Moore, B.D. 2006a. Number of mates and timing of mating affect offspring growth in the small marsupial Antechinus agilis. Anim. Behav. 71 : 289 297.
18. Fisher, D.O., Double, M.C., Blomberg, S.P., Jennions, M.D. Cockburn, A. 2006b. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444 : 89 92.
19. García-González, F. 2004. Infertile matings and sperm competition: The effect of 'nonsperm representation' on intraspecific variation in sperm precedence patterns. Am. Nat. 164 : 457 472.
20. García-González, F. Simmons, L.W. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 1097 1103.
21. Harano, T., Yasui, Y. Miyatake, T. 2006. Direct effects of polyandry on female fitness in Callosobruchus chinensis. Anim. Behav. 71 : 539 548.
22. Head, M.L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R.C. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLOS Biol. 3 : 289 294.
23. Hunt, J., Bussière, L., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R.C. 2004. What is genetic quality Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 329 333.
24. Ivy, T.M. Sakaluk, S.K. 2005. Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59 : 152 159.
25. Ivy, T.M., Weddle, C.B. Sakaluk, S.K. 2005. Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272 : 2475 2478.
26. Jennions, M.D. Møller, A.P. 2002. Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 43 48.
27. Jennions, M.D. Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75 : 21 64.
28. Jennions, M.D., Hunt, J., Graham, R. Brooks, R. 2004. No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through postcopulatory mechanisms in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution 58 : 2472 2477.
29. Kamimura, Y. 2003. Effects of repeated mating and polyandry on the fecundity, fertility and maternal behaviour of female earwigs, Euborellia plebeja. Anim. Behav. 65 : 205 214.
30. Kelly, C.D. 2006. Replicating empirical research in animal behaviour: how and why it should be done but rarely ever is. Q. Rev. Biol. 81 : 221 236.
31. Konior, M., Radwan, J. Kolodziejczyk, M. 2001. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55 : 1893 1896.
32. Kozielska, M., Krzemińska, A. Radwan, J. 2004. Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 : 165 170.
33. Leimu, R. Koricheva, J. 2005. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 28 32.
34. Lynch, M. Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
35. Møller, A.P. Jennions, M.D. 2001. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 580 586.
36. Madsen, T., Shine, R., Loman, J. Håkansson, T. 1992. Why do female adders copulate so frequently Nature 355, 440 441.
37. Newcomer, S.D., Zeh, J.A. Zeh, D.W. 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 : 10236 10241.
38. Ojanguren, A.F., Evans, J.P. Magurran, A.E. 2005. Multiple mating influences offspring size in guppies. J. Fish Biol. 67 : 1184 1188.
39. Orsetti, D.M. Rutowski, R.L. 2003. No material benefits, and a fertilization cost, for multiple mating by female leaf beetles. Anim. Behav. 66 : 477 484.
40. Palmer, A.R. 2000. Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 31 : 441 480.
41. Preston, B.T., Stevenson, I.R., Pemberton, J.M. Wilson, K. 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409 : 681 682.
42. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
43. Simmons, L.W. 2001. The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good-sperm hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 585 594.
44. Simmons, L.W. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36 : 125 146.
45. Tregenza, T. Wedell, N. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52 : 1726 1730.
46. Tregenza, T. Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol. 9 : 1013 1027.
47. Tregenza, T., Wedell, N., Hosken, D.J. Wards, P.I. 2003. Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies. Evolution 57 : 297 304.
48. Trikalinos, T.A. Ioannidis, J.P.A. 2005. Assessing the evolution of effect sizes over time. In : Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton M. Borenstein, eds pp. 241 259. John Wiley, New York.
49. Venables, W.N. Ripley, B.D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer Verlag, New York.
50. Watson, P.J. 1998. Multi-male mating and female choice increase offspring growth in the spider Neriene litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 55 : 387 403.
51. Wedell, N. Tregenza, T. 1999. Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53 : 620 625.
52. Worden, B.D. Parker, P.G. 2001. Polyandry in grain beetles, Tenebrio molitor, leads to greater reproductive success: material or genetic benefits Behav. Ecol. 12 : 761 767.
53. Yasui, Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 : 246 250.
54. Zeh, J.A. Zeh, D.W. 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109 : 929 950.
55. Zeh, J.A. Zeh, D.W. 2006. Outbred embryos rescue inbred half-siblings in mixed-paternity broods of live-bearing females. Nature 439 : 201 203.