Overall welfare assessment of laying hens: Comparing science-based, environment-based and animal-based assessments

Animal Science Journal

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 150-160

  Shimmura, Tsuyoshi ^a   Bracke, Marc B M ^c   De Mol, Rudi M ^c   Hirahara, Satoshi ^b   Uetake, Katsuji ^a   Tanaka, Toshio ^a  

^a AZABU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Kanagawa Prefectural Livestock Industry Technology Center   (Japan)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal Needs Index; Decision support system; Housing system; Laying hens; Welfare assessment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOLOGY; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; OVIPOSITION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79251502981     PISSN: 13443941     EISSN: 17400929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00834.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Alban L, Ersboll AK, Bennedsgaard TW, Johnsen PF. 2001. Validation of welfare assessment methods at herd level: an example. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica A: Animal Science (Supplement) 30, 99-102.
2. Anonymous. 2001. Scientists' assessment of the impact of housing and management on animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4, 3-52.
3. Appleby MC. 1995. Perch length in cages for medium hybrid laying hens. British Poultry Science 36, 21-31.
4. Appleby MC, Hughes BO, Hogarth GS. 1989. Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. British Poultry Science 30, 545-553.
5. Appleby MC, Mench JA, Hughes BO. 2004. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK.
6. Bartussek H. 1999. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals' well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61, 179-192.
7. Bartussek H. 2001. Animal Needs Index for laying hens. ANI 35-L/2001 - laying hens. Federal Research Institute for Agriculture in Alpine Regions, Irdning, Australia; [cited 14 December 2009]. Available from URL:
8. Bilčik B, Keeling LJ. 1999. Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science 40, 444-451.
9. Blokhuis HJ, Fiks Van Niekerk T, Bessei W, Elson A, Guémené D, Kjaer JB, Maria Levrino GA, Nicol CJ, Tauson R, Weeks CA, Van De Weerd HA. 2007. The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 63, 101-114.
10. Bokkers EAM, Koene P. 2001. Activity, oral behaviour and slaughter data as welfare indicators in veal calves: a comparison of three housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 1-15.
11. Botreau R, Bonde M, Butterworth A, Perny P, Bracke MBM, Capdeville J, Veissier I. 2007a. Aggregation of measurements to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 1, 1179-1187.
12. Botreau R, Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bracke MBM, Keeling LJ. 2007b. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 16, 225-228.
13. Bracke MBM. 2007. Animal-based parameters are no panacea for on-farm monitoring of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 16, 229-231.
14. Bracke MBM. 2008. RICHPIG: a semantic model to assess enrichment materials for pigs. Animal Welfare 17, 289-304.
15. Bracke MBM, Edwards SA, Metz JHM, Noordhuizen JPTM, Algers B. 2008. Synthesis of semantic modelling and risk analysis methodology applied to animal welfare. Animal 2, 1061-1072.
16. Bracke MBM, Metz JHM, Spruijt BM, Dijkhuizen AA. 1999a. Overall welfare assessment of pregnant sow housing systems based on interviews with experts. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 47, 93-104.
17. Bracke MBM, Metz JHM, Spruijt BM, Schouten WGP. 2002b. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows B: validation by expert opinion. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1835-1845.
18. Bracke MBM, Spruijt BM, Metz JHM. 1999b. Overall animal welfare reviewed. Part 3: welfare assessment based on needs and supported by experts opinion. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 47, 307-322.
19. Bracke MBM, Spruijt BM, Metz JHM, Schouten WGP. 2002a. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: model structure and weighting procedure. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1819-1834.
20. Butterworth A, Algers B, Arnould C, Forkman B, Froehlich E, Graml C, Heiskanen T, Keeling L, Kniebuhr K, Knierim U, Lentfer T, Sandilands V, Staack M, Waiblinger S, Wemelsfelder F, Haslam SM, Westerath HS, Zimmerman P. 2007. Tables of measures developed in Welfare Quality® to monitor animal welfare: layers. In: Veissier I, Forkman B, Jones B (eds), The Proceedings of Second Welfare Quality® Stakeholder Conference, pp. 82-83. Welfare Quality®, Berlin, Germany.
21. Dawkins MS. 1981. Priorities in the cage size and flooring preferences of domestic hens. British Poultry Science 22, 255-263.
22. Dawkins MS. 1989. Time budgets in Red Junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24, 77-80.
23. Dawkins MS, Beardsley T. 1986. Reinforcing properties of access to litter in hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15, 351-364.
24. Dawkins MS, Hardie S. 1989. Space needs of laying hens. British Poultry Science 30, 413-416.
25. De Mol RM, Schouten WGP, Evers E, Drost H, Houwers HWJ, Smits AC. 2006. A computer model for welfare assessment of poultry production systems for laying hens. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 54, 157-168.
26. European Union. 1999. Council directive laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.
27. European Union. 2005. Special Eurobarometer 229: attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. European Commission; [cited 14 December 2009]. Available from URL:
28. Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC). 1992. Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. [cited 21 September 2010]. Available from URL:
29. Faure JM, Lagadic H. 1994. Elasticity of demand for food and sand in laying hens subjected to variable wind speed. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42, 49-59.
30. Freeman BM. 1983. Floor space allowances for the caged domestic fowl. Veterinary Record 112, 562-563.
31. Gunnarsso S, Matthews LR, Foster TM, Temple W. 2000. The demand for straw and feather as litter substrates by laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65, 321-330.
32. Hogan JA, Van Boxel F. 1993. Causal factors controlling dustbathing in Burmese Red Junglefowl: some results and a model. Animal Behaviour 46, 627-633.
33. Hughes BO. 1976. Preference decisions of domestic hens for wire or litter floors. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 155-165.
34. Hughes BO, Carmichael NL, Walker AW, Griger PN. 1997. Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 215-234.
35. Hughes BO, Wood-Gush DGM. 1977. Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: the influence of housing method and group size. Animal Behaviour 25, 1056-1062.
36. Hurnik JF, Lewis NJ. 1991. Body-surface area, a reference for space allowance in confinement. Poultry Science 70, 412-415.
37. Kohari D, Kosako T, Fukasawa M, Tsukada H, Sato S. 2006. Animal Welfare Evaluation of Grazing environment by Animal Needs Index: ANI35L/2000-cattle (Case Study). Animal behaviour and Management 42, 93-100. (In Japanese with English abstract).
38. Lagadic H, Faure J. 1987. Preferences of domestic hens for cage size and floor types as measured by operant conditioning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19, 147-155.
39. Lawrence AB. 2008. Applied animal behaviour science: past, present and future prospects. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 115, 1-24.
40. Lindberg AC, Nicol CJ. 1997. Dustbathing in modified battery cages: is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55, 113-128.
41. Lundberg AS, Keeling LJ. 2003. Social effects on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens: using video images to investigate effect of rank. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 43-57.
42. Mahboub HDH, Müller J, Von Borell E. 2004. Outdoor use, tonic immobility, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and feather condition in free-range laying hens of different genotype. British Poultry Science 45, 738-744.
43. Mollenhorst H, Rodenburg TB, Bokkers EAM, Koene P, de Boer IJM. 2005. On-farm assessment of laying hen welfare: a comparison of one environment-based and two animal-based methods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90, 277-291.
44. Olsson IC, Duncan IJH, Keeling LJ, Widowski TM. 2002. How important is social facilitation for dustbathing motivation in laying hens? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79, 285-297.
45. Perry GC (ed.). 2004. Welfare of Laying Hen. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK.
46. Petherick JC, Seawright E, Waddington D. 1993. Influence of motivational state on choice of food or a dustbathing/foraging substrate by domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 28, 209-220.
47. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [cited 14 December 2009]. Available from URL:
48. Sandøe P, Munksgaar L, Badsgard NP, Jensen KH. 1997. How to manage the management factor - assessing animal welfare at the farm level. In: Sørensen JT (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems, pp. 221-230. European Association for Animal Production, publication No. 89, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
49. Savory CJ. 1995. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poultry Science Journal 51, 215-219.
50. Scientific Veterinary Committee. 1996. Report on the welfare of laying hens. pp. 1-147.
51. Seo T, Date K, Daigo T, Kashiwamura F, Sato S. 2007. Welfare assessment on Japanese dairy farms using the Animal Needs Index. Animal Welfare 16, 221-223.
52. Shimmura T, Azuma T, Hirahara S, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2008c. Relation between social order and use of resources in small and large furnished cages for laying hens. British Poultry Science 49, 516-524.
53. Shimmura T, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2007b. Behavior, performance and physical condition of laying hens in conventional and small furnished cages. Animal Science Journal 78, 323-329.
54. Shimmura T, Hirahara S, Azuma T, Suzuki T, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2010. Multi-factorial investigation of various housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science 51, 31-42.
55. Shimmura T, Hirahara S, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2007a. Behavior, physiology, performance and physical condition of laying hens in conventional and large furnished cages in a hot environment. Animal Science Journal 78, 314-322.
56. Shimmura T, Suzuki T, Azuma T, Hirahara S, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2008a. Form but not frequency of beak use by hens is changed by housing system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 115, 44-54.
57. Shimmura T, Suzuki T, Hirahara S, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2008b. Pecking behaviour of laying hens in single-tiered aviaries with and without outdoor area. British Poultry Science 49, 396-401.
58. Shinmura T, Eguchi Y, Uetake K, Tanaka T. 2006. Behavioral change of laying hens after introduction to battery cages, furnished cages and an aviary. Animal Science Journal 77, 242-249.
59. Sundrum A. 1997. Assessing livestock housing conditions in terms of animal welfare: possibilities and limitations. In: Sørensen JT (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems, pp. 238-246. European Association for Animal Production, publication No. 89, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
60. Tanaka T, Hurnik JF. 1992. Comparison of behaviour and performance of Laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poultry Science 71, 235-243.
61. Tauson R. 2005. Management and housing systems for layers - effect on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal 61, 477-490.
62. Ursinus WW, Schepers F, de Mol RM, Bracke MBM, Mets JHM, Houwers HWJ, Groot Koerkamp PWG. 2008. COWEL: a decision support system to assess welfare of husbandry systems for dairy cattle. Animal Welfare 18, 545-552.
63. Van Liere DW. 1992. The significance of fowls' bathing in dust. Animal Welfare 1, 187-202.
64. Van Liere DW, Bokma S. 1987. Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dust- bathing in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18, 197-204.
65. Van Liere DW, Wiepkema PR. 1992. Effects of long-term deprivation of sand on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens. Animal behaviour 43, 549-558.
66. Vestergaard K. 1982. Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl - diurnal rhythm and dust deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology 8, 487-495.
67. Vestergaard K, Hogan JA, Kruijt JP. 1990. The Development of a behavior system: dustbathing in the Burmese red junglefowl I. the influence of the rearing environment on the organization of dustbathing. Behaviour 112, 99-116.
68. Vestergaard KS, Kruijt JP, Hogan JA. 1993. Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red junglefowl: their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Animal Behaviour 45, 1127-1140.
69. Vestergaard KS, Skadhauge E, Lawson LG. 1997. The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens. Physiology and Behaviour 62, 413-419.
70. Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. 2003. An animal-based welfare assessment for group-housed calves on UK dairy farms. Animal Welfare 12, 611-617.
71. Widowski TM, Duncan IJH. 2000. Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 39-53.
72. Zeludik K, Lugmair A, Baumung R, Troxler J, Niebuhr K. 2007. Results of the Animal Needs Index (ANI-35L) compared to animal-based parameters in free-range and organic laying hen flock in Austria. Animal Welfare 16, 217-219.