메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-53

The Review Process: What Is It?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PEER REVIEW;

EID: 79251492666     PISSN: 10899472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2010.11.006     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (1)

References (13)
  • 1
    • 77954896034 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responding to peer review
    • Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
    • Jutel A. Responding to peer review. Nurse Author Ed 2007, 17. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=69.
    • (2007) Nurse Author Ed , vol.17
    • Jutel, A.1
  • 2
    • 18244370809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices
    • Freda M.C., Kearney M.H. An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices. J Nurs Scholarsh 2005, 37:87-94.
    • (2005) J Nurs Scholarsh , vol.37 , pp. 87-94
    • Freda, M.C.1    Kearney, M.H.2
  • 3
    • 33749242738 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • " Voice of the profession": Nurse editors as leaders
    • Kearney M.H., Freda M.C. " Voice of the profession": Nurse editors as leaders. Nurs Outlook 2006, 54:263-267.
    • (2006) Nurs Outlook , vol.54 , pp. 263-267
    • Kearney, M.H.1    Freda, M.C.2
  • 4
  • 5
    • 54749086738 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers
    • Kearney M.H., Baggs J.G., Broome M.E., et al. Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008, 40:395-400.
    • (2008) J Nurs Scholarsh , vol.40 , pp. 395-400
    • Kearney, M.H.1    Baggs, J.G.2    Broome, M.E.3
  • 6
    • 58149328502 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research
    • Henly S.J., Dougherty M.C. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Nurs Outlook 2009, 57:18-26.
    • (2009) Nurs Outlook , vol.57 , pp. 18-26
    • Henly, S.J.1    Dougherty, M.C.2
  • 7
    • 78649312028 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript reviewing: An ethical perspective
    • Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
    • Wurzbuch M.E. Manuscript reviewing: An ethical perspective. Nurse Author Ed 2007, 17. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=96.
    • (2007) Nurse Author Ed , vol.17
    • Wurzbuch, M.E.1
  • 8
    • 78649689715 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Barriers and strategies to the revision process from an editor's perspective
    • Moos D.D., Hawkins P. Barriers and strategies to the revision process from an editor's perspective. Nurs Forum 2009, 44:79-92.
    • (2009) Nurs Forum , vol.44 , pp. 79-92
    • Moos, D.D.1    Hawkins, P.2
  • 9
    • 34548092230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tips for reviewing manuscripts
    • Griffin-Sobel J.P. Tips for reviewing manuscripts. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2004, 8:653.
    • (2004) Clin J Oncol Nurs , vol.8 , pp. 653
    • Griffin-Sobel, J.P.1
  • 10
    • 79251489508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of editors as mentors
    • Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
    • Hawkins J.W. The role of editors as mentors. Nurse Author Ed 2009, 19. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=124.
    • (2009) Nurse Author Ed , vol.19
    • Hawkins, J.W.1
  • 11
    • 75949119642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An interview with the editors
    • Moos D.D. An interview with the editors. J Perianesth Nurs 2010, 25:46-49.
    • (2010) J Perianesth Nurs , vol.25 , pp. 46-49
    • Moos, D.D.1
  • 12
    • 0034833464 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports
    • Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 2001, 76:889-893.
    • (2001) Acad Med , vol.76 , pp. 889-893
    • Bordage, G.1
  • 13
    • 79251480454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The 4 Rs of revising your manuscript: Reading, reflecting, rewriting, and responding
    • Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
    • Pierson C. The 4 Rs of revising your manuscript: Reading, reflecting, rewriting, and responding. Nurse Author Ed 2008, 18. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=124.
    • (2008) Nurse Author Ed , vol.18
    • Pierson, C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.