-
1
-
-
77954896034
-
Responding to peer review
-
Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
-
Jutel A. Responding to peer review. Nurse Author Ed 2007, 17. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=69.
-
(2007)
Nurse Author Ed
, vol.17
-
-
Jutel, A.1
-
2
-
-
18244370809
-
An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices
-
Freda M.C., Kearney M.H. An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices. J Nurs Scholarsh 2005, 37:87-94.
-
(2005)
J Nurs Scholarsh
, vol.37
, pp. 87-94
-
-
Freda, M.C.1
Kearney, M.H.2
-
3
-
-
33749242738
-
" Voice of the profession": Nurse editors as leaders
-
Kearney M.H., Freda M.C. " Voice of the profession": Nurse editors as leaders. Nurs Outlook 2006, 54:263-267.
-
(2006)
Nurs Outlook
, vol.54
, pp. 263-267
-
-
Kearney, M.H.1
Freda, M.C.2
-
4
-
-
45549105173
-
The peer review process
-
Miracle V.A. The peer review process. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2008, 27:67-69.
-
(2008)
Dimens Crit Care Nurs
, vol.27
, pp. 67-69
-
-
Miracle, V.A.1
-
5
-
-
54749086738
-
Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers
-
Kearney M.H., Baggs J.G., Broome M.E., et al. Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008, 40:395-400.
-
(2008)
J Nurs Scholarsh
, vol.40
, pp. 395-400
-
-
Kearney, M.H.1
Baggs, J.G.2
Broome, M.E.3
-
6
-
-
58149328502
-
Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research
-
Henly S.J., Dougherty M.C. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Nurs Outlook 2009, 57:18-26.
-
(2009)
Nurs Outlook
, vol.57
, pp. 18-26
-
-
Henly, S.J.1
Dougherty, M.C.2
-
7
-
-
78649312028
-
Manuscript reviewing: An ethical perspective
-
Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
-
Wurzbuch M.E. Manuscript reviewing: An ethical perspective. Nurse Author Ed 2007, 17. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=96.
-
(2007)
Nurse Author Ed
, vol.17
-
-
Wurzbuch, M.E.1
-
8
-
-
78649689715
-
Barriers and strategies to the revision process from an editor's perspective
-
Moos D.D., Hawkins P. Barriers and strategies to the revision process from an editor's perspective. Nurs Forum 2009, 44:79-92.
-
(2009)
Nurs Forum
, vol.44
, pp. 79-92
-
-
Moos, D.D.1
Hawkins, P.2
-
9
-
-
34548092230
-
Tips for reviewing manuscripts
-
Griffin-Sobel J.P. Tips for reviewing manuscripts. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2004, 8:653.
-
(2004)
Clin J Oncol Nurs
, vol.8
, pp. 653
-
-
Griffin-Sobel, J.P.1
-
10
-
-
79251489508
-
The role of editors as mentors
-
Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
-
Hawkins J.W. The role of editors as mentors. Nurse Author Ed 2009, 19. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=124.
-
(2009)
Nurse Author Ed
, vol.19
-
-
Hawkins, J.W.1
-
11
-
-
75949119642
-
An interview with the editors
-
Moos D.D. An interview with the editors. J Perianesth Nurs 2010, 25:46-49.
-
(2010)
J Perianesth Nurs
, vol.25
, pp. 46-49
-
-
Moos, D.D.1
-
12
-
-
0034833464
-
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports
-
Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 2001, 76:889-893.
-
(2001)
Acad Med
, vol.76
, pp. 889-893
-
-
Bordage, G.1
-
13
-
-
79251480454
-
The 4 Rs of revising your manuscript: Reading, reflecting, rewriting, and responding
-
Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]
-
Pierson C. The 4 Rs of revising your manuscript: Reading, reflecting, rewriting, and responding. Nurse Author Ed 2008, 18. Available at:, Accessed August 18, 2010. [This Web site requires registration.]. http://www.nurseauthoreditor.com/article.asp?id=124.
-
(2008)
Nurse Author Ed
, vol.18
-
-
Pierson, C.1
|