Experience, time investment, and motivators of Nursing Journal Peer Reviewers

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 395-400

  Kearney, Margaret H ^a   Baggs, Judith G ^b   Broome, Marion E ^c   Dougherty, Molly C ^d   Freda, Margaret C ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical publication; Journalology; Nursing; Peer review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; NURSING; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; TIME;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; MOTIVATION; NURSING; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; TIME;

EID: 54749086738     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: 15475069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00255.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Callaham, M.L., & Tercier, J. (2007). The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. PLoS Medicine, 4 (1 e40, doi :.
2. Cobo, E., Selva-O'Callagham, A., Ribera, J-M., Cardellach, F., Dominguez, R., & Vilardell, M. (2007). Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: A randomized trial. PLoS ONE, 2 (3 e332, doi :.
3. Day, F.C., Schriger, D.L., Todd, C., & Wears, R.L. (2002). The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 40, 329 333.
4. Freda, M.C., & Kearney, M. (2005). An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37, 87 94.
5. Johnston, S.C., Lowenstein, D.H., Ferriero, D.M., Messing, R.O., Oksenberg, J.R., & Hauser, S.L. (2007). Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: A randomized trial. Annals of Neurology, 61, A10 A12.
6. Kliewer, M.A., Freed, K.S., DeLong, D.M., Pickhardt, P.J., & Provenzale, J.M. (2005). Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 1731 1735.
7. McConnell, E.A. (2000). Nursing publications outside the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32, 87 92.
8. Snell, L., & Spencer, J. (2005). Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Medical Education, 39, 90 97.
9. Tite, L., & Schroter, S. (2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 9 12.