Erratum: Globalized public management: An interdisciplinary design science? (Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2011) 21:1 (i53-i59) DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq064);Globalized public management: An interdisciplinary design science?

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 397-

  Walker, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251480068     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq091     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Aboelala, Sally W., Elaine Larson, Suzanne Bakken, Olveen Carrasquillo, Allan Formicola, Sherry A. Glied, Janet Haas, and Kristine M. Gebbie. 2006. Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research Trust 42:329-37.
2. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
3. Andrews, Rhys, and Tom Entwistle. 2010. Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20:679-701.
4. Boyne, George A., Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O'Toole Jr, and Richard M. Walker, eds. 2006. Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. Boyne, George A., and Richard M. Walker. 2005. Determinants of performance in public organizations symposium. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:483-639.
6. Bozeman, B. 1987. All organizations are public. London: Jossey-Bass.
7. -. 2000. Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. -. 2007. Public values and public interest. Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
9. Bozeman, B., and H. George Frederickson. 2006. The origins of the public management research association. Management Matters 4:1-8.
10. Brewer, Garry D. 1999. The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32:327-37.
11. Bouckaert, Geert, Steven Van de Walle, and Jarl K. Kampen. 2005. Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences 71:229-40.
12. Chun, Young Han., and Hal G. Rainey. 2005. 'Goal ambiguity in U.S. federal agencies'. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:1-30.
13. Daley, Dorothy M. 2009. Interdisciplinary problems of agency boundaries: Exploring effective crossagency collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19:477-93.
14. Frederickson, H George. 1990. Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review 50:228-37.
15. Gao, Jie. 2010. Hitting the target but missing the point: The rise of non-mission-based targets in performance management of Chinese local governments. Administration & Society 42 (S1): 56-76.
16. Greenwood, Royston, C. R. Hinnings, and Stewart Ranson. 1976. Contingency theory and the organization of local authorities. Part I: Differentiation and integration. Public Administration 53:1-23.
17. Heinrich, Carolyn, and Brint Milward. 2010. The state of agents: A special issue. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(Suppl. 1): i1-i175.
18. Hou, Yilin, Anna Ya Ni, Ora-orn Poocharoen, Kaifeng Yang, and Zhirong Zhao. 2011. The Case for Public Administration with a Global Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (Suppl 1): i45-i51.
19. Krueathep, Weerasak, Norma M. Riccucci, and Charas Suwanmala. 2010. Why do agencies work together? The determinants of network formation at the subnational level of government in Thailand. Journal of Public Administration and Research 20:157-85.
20. Lorsch, Jay W., and John J. Morse. 1974. Organizations and their members: a contingency approach. New York: Harper & Row.
21. Moe, Terry M. 1994. Integrating politics and organizations: Positive theory and public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4:17-25.
22. Mosher, Frederick C. 1956. Research in public administration: Some notes and suggestions. Public Administration Review 16:169-78.
23. Nickel, Patricia Mooney. 2009. Public administration and/or public sociology. Disciplinary convergence and the disciplinary dispersion of public sentimentality. Administration & Society 41:185-212.
24. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Modernising government. The way forward. Paris: OECD.
25. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57:45-52.
26. Peters, B Guy., and Jon Pierre. 2003. Handbook of public administration. London: Sage.
27. Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckeart. 2004. Public management reform: a comparative analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
28. Rainey, Hal G. 2003. Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Shangraw, R. F., Jr., and Michael M. Crow. 1989. Public administration as a design science. Public Administration Review 49:153-8.
30. Simon, Herbert A. 1996. Sciences of the artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Walker, Richard M., and George A. Boyne. 2009. Determinants of performance in public organizations symposium II. Public Administration 87:433-518.
32. Walker, Richard M., George A. Boyne, and Gene A. Brewer. 2010. Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
33. Walker, Richard M., Gene A. Brewer, and Yujin Choi. 2010. Public administration research in East and Southeast Asia: A review of the English language evidence 1999-2009. PMRA.IRSPM.ASIA: Public Management Research Association and International Society for Public Management Research Conference, University of Hong Kong, December 14-16.
34. Wu, Xun, Yan-Ling Hi, Milan Tung-Wen Sun, and Allen Lai. 2010. Public administration research in Mainland China and Taiwan: An assessment of journal publications 1998-2008. Presented at the Reform and Transition in Public Administration Theory and Practice in Greater China: 1978-2008. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Hong Kong. http://www.hku.hk/kadinst/PA-China- Symposium.html (accessed January 27, 2010).