The case for public administration with a global perspective

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Hou, Yilin ^a   Ni, Anna Ya ^b   Poocharoen, Ora Orn ^c   Yang, Kaifeng ^d   Zhao, Zhirong J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251475889     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq070     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Banks, Arthur, and Robert Textor. 1963. A cross-polity survey. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. 2002. Global public policy, partnership, and the case of the World Commission on dams. Public Administration Review 62:324-36.
3. Esman, Milton. 1966. The politics of development administration. In Approaches to development: Politics, administration and change, ed. J. D. Montgomery and W. J. Siffin. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4. Farazmand, Ali. 1996. Development and comparative public administration: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Quarterly 20:343-64.
5. Heady, Ferrel. 1995. Public administration in comparative perspective, 5th ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
6. Hood, Christopher. 1989. Public administration and public policy: Intellectual challenges for the 1990s. Australian Journal of Public Administration 48:346-58.
7. Jreisat, Jamil E. 2002. Comparative public administration and policy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8. -. 2005. Comparative public administration is back in, prudently. Public Administrative Review 65:231-42.
9. Raadschelders, Jos C. N. 1999. A coherent framework for the study of public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9:281-303.
10. Riggs, Fred W. 1991. Public administration: A comparative framework. Public Administration Review 51:473-77.
11. -. 1976. The group and the movement: Notes on comparative and development administration. Public Administration Review 36:648-54.
12. Robertz, Alasdair. 2004. Transborder service systems: Pathways for innovation or threats to accountability? Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
13. Schick, Allen. 1990. Budgeting for results: Recent developments in five industrialized countries. Public Administration Review 50:26-34.
14. Tummala, Krishna K. 1998. Comparative study and the section on Comparative and International Administration (SICA). Public Administration Review 58:21.
15. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1984. The politics of the budgetary process, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.