Test-retest reliability of 3D kinematic gait variables in hip osteoarthritis patients

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 194-199

  Laroche, D ^a   Duval, A ^a   Morisset, C ^a   Beis, J N ^b   d'Athis, P ^a   Maillefert, J F ^a,b,c   Ornetti, P ^a,b,c  

^a DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

3D gait analysis; Hip; Kinematics; Osteoarthritis; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GAIT; GONIOMETRY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEG; MALE; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL GAIT ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRUNK;

AGED; ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KINETICS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79151486070     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zhang W., Moskowitz R.W., Nuki G., Abramson S., Altman R.D., Arden N., et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:137-162.
2. Ornetti P., Perruccio A.V., Roos E.M., Lohmander L.S., Davis A.M., Maillefert J.F. Psychometric properties of the French translation of the reduced KOOS and HOOS (KOOS-PS and HOOS-PS). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:1604-1608.
3. Roos E.M., Roos H.P., Lohmander L.S., Ekdahl C., Beynnon B.D. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 28:88-96.
4. Lieberman J.R., Dorey F., Shekelle P., Schumacher L., Thomas B.J., Kilgus D.J., et al. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:835-838.
5. Laroche D., Pozzo T., Ornetti P., Tavernier C., Maillefert J.F. Effects of loss of metatarsophalangeal joint mobility on gait in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology 2006, 45:435-440.
6. Laroche D., Ornetti P., Thomas E., Ballay Y., Maillefert J.F., Pozzo T. Kinematic adaptation of locomotor pattern in rheumatoid arthritis patients with forefoot impairment. Exp Brain Res 2007, V176:85.
7. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., McFadyen B.J. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000, 15:504-515.
8. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ragland P.S., Starr R., Erhart J., Bhave A. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:100-108.
9. Hulet C., Hurwitz D.E., Andriacchi T.P., Galante J.O., Vielpeau C. [Functional gait adaptations in patients with painful hip]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000, 86:581-589.
10. Kyriazis V., Rigas C. Temporal gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients operated with cementless hip replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17:318-321.
11. Gibbs J., Hughes S., Dunlop D., Edelman P., Singer R., Chang R. Joint impairment and ambulation in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993, 41:1205-1211.
12. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H.K., Wootten M.E., Gainey J., Gorton G., Cochran G.V. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 1989, 7:849-860.
13. Diss C.E. The reliability of kinetic and kinematic variables used to analyse normal running gait. Gait Posture 2001, 14:98-103.
14. Maynard V., Bakheit A.M., Oldham J., Freeman J. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of gait measurements with CODA mpx30 motion analysis system. Gait Posture 2003, 17:59-67.
15. Growney E., Meglan D., Johnson M., Cahalan T., An K.-N. Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system. Gait Posture 1997, 6:147.
16. Ornetti P., Maillefert J.F., Laroche D., Morisset C., Dougados M., Gossec L. Gait analysis as a quantifiable outcome measure in hip or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Joint Bone Spine 2010, 77:421-425.
17. Monaghan K., Delahunt E., Caulfield B. Increasing the number of gait trial recordings maximises intra-rater reliability of the CODA motion analysis system. Gait Posture 2007, 25:303.
18. Schwartz M.H., Trost J.P., Wervey R.A. Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. Gait Posture 2004, 20:196.
19. Altman R., Alarcon G., Appelrouth D., Bloch D., Borenstein D., Brandt K., et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 1991, 34:505-514.
20. Borghese N.A., Bianchi L., Lacquaniti F. Kinematic determinants of human locomotion. J Physiol 1996, 494(Pt 3):863-879.
21. Ivanenko Y.P., Grasso R., Macellari V., Lacquaniti F. Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:3070-3089.
22. Grasso R., Zago M., Lacquaniti F. Interactions between posture and locomotion: motor patterns in humans walking with bent posture versus erect posture. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83:288-300.
23. Courtine G., Schieppati M. Human walking along a curved path. I. Body trajectory, segment orientation and the effect of vision. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 18:177-190.
24. Lacquaniti F., Grasso R., Zago M. Motor patterns in walking. News Physiol Sci 1999, 14:168-174.
25. Lacquaniti F., Ivanenko Y.P., Zago M. Kinematic control of walking. Arch Ital Biol 2002, 140:263-272.
26. McGraw K., Wong S. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:30-46.
27. Eliasziw M., Young S.L., Woodbury M.G., Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994, 74:777-788.
28. Rankin G., Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 1998, 12:187-199.
29. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
30. Lequesne M. Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1991, 20:48-54.
31. Dujardin F., Aucouturier T., Bocquet G., Duparc F., Weber J., Thomine J.M. [Kinematics of the healthy and arthritic hip joint during walking. A study of 136 subjects]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1998, 84:689-699.
32. Reinbolt J.A., Schutte J.F., Fregly B.J., Koh B.I., Haftka R.T., George A.D., et al. Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization. J Biomech 2005, 38:621-626.
33. Schwartz M.H., Rozumalski A. A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. J Biomech 2005, 38:107.
34. Charlton I.W., Tate P., Smyth P., Roren L. Repeatability of an optimised lower body model. Gait Posture 2004, 20:213.
35. Lindemann U., Becker C., Unnewehr I., Muche R., Aminin K., Dejnabadi H., et al. Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 2006, 20:413-420.
36. Monaghan K., Delahunt E., Caulfield B. Ankle function during gait in patients with chronic ankle instability compared to controls. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006, 21:168.