Performance and microbial community analysis of two-stage process with extreme thermophilic hydrogen and thermophilic methane production from hydrolysate in UASB reactors

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 4028-4035

  Kongjan, Prawit ^a   O Thong, Sompong ^a,b   Angelidaki, Irini ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b THAKSIN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Hemicelluloses; Hydrogen and methane; Two stage anaerobic digestion; UASB reactor

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; ANAEROBIC PROCESS; ENERGY RECOVERY; HEMICELLULOSES; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROGEN PRODUCING BACTERIA; METHANE PRODUCTION; METHANE YIELD; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY ANALYSIS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; TOTAL ENERGY; TWO STAGE; TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONS; TWO-STAGE PROCESS; UASB REACTOR; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BED REACTORS; WHEAT STRAWS;

CELLULOSE; CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; ENERGY CONVERSION; HYDROGEN; METHANE; REMOVAL; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

HYDROGEN; METHANE; RNA 16S;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROGEN; METHANE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POTENTIAL ENERGY; STABILIZATION; STRAW; THERMOPHILY; WHEAT;

ARTICLE; METHANOSARCINA MAZEI; METHANOTHERMOBACTER; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMOANAEROBACTER; UPFLOW REACTOR;

BIOREACTORS; BIOTA; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; EURYARCHAEOTA; GRAM-POSITIVE RODS; HYDROGEN; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; PLANT COMPONENTS, AERIAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TRITICUM; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

CALORAMATOR FERVIDUS; METHANOSARCINA MAZEI; METHANOTHERMOBACTER DEFLUVII; THERMOANAEROBACTER WIEGELII; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 79151482457     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schäffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., David J., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:3389-3402.
2. Angelidaki I., Petersen S.P., Ahring B.K. Effects of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid inhibition upon addition of bentonite. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1990, 33:469-472.
3. Antonopoulou G., Gavala H., Skiadas I., Angelopoulos K., Lyberatos G. Biofuels generation from sweet sorghum: fermentative hydrogen production and anaerobic digestion of the remaining biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(1):110-119.
4. Batstone D., Keller J., Blackall L. The influence of substrate kinetics on the microbial community structure in granular anaerobic biomass. Water Res. 2004, 38(6):390-1404.
5. Boopathy R. Methanogenesis from furfural by defined mixed cultures. Curr. Microbiol. 2002, 44(6):406-410.
6. Brune G., Schoberth S., Sahm H. Growth of a strictly anaerobic bacterium on furfural (2-furaldehyde). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46(5):1187-1192.
7. Chang J., Chen W., Shih S., Yu S., Lay J., Wen F., Huang C. Molecular detection of the clostridia in an anaerobic biohydrogen fermentation system by hydrogenase mRNA-targeted reverse transcription-PCR. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 70(5):598-604.
8. Chauhan A., Ogram A. Evaluation of support matrices for immobilization of anaerobic consortia for efficient carbon cycling in waste regeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 327:884-893.
9. Compton R., Perkin S., Gamblin D., Davis J., Marken F., Padden A., John P. Clostridium isatidis colonised carbon electrodes: voltammetric evidence for direct solid state redox processes. New J. Chem. 2000, 24(3):179-181.
10. Demirel B., Yenigun O. Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 77(7):743-755.
11. Gattrell M., Gupta N., Co A. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons to store renewable electrical energy and upgrade biogas. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2007, 48(4):1255-1265.
12. Gavala H., Skiadas I., Ahring B. Biological hydrogen production in suspended and attached growth anaerobic reactor systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2006, 31(9):1164-1175.
13. Haggblom M.M., Young L.L. Anaerobic degradation of halogenated phenols by sulfate-reducing consortia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61(4):1546-1550.
14. Kaparaju P., Serrano M., Angelidaki I. Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(24):6317-6323.
15. Kaparaju P., Serrano M., Thomsen A., Kongjan P., Angelidaki I. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(9):2562-2568.
16. Karakashev D., Batstone D., Angelidaki I. Influence of environmental conditions on methanogenic compositions in anaerobic biogas reactors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71(1):331-338.
17. Keyser M., Witthuhn R.C., Lampercht C., Coetzee M.P.A., Britz T.J. PCR-based DGGE fingerprinting and identification of methanogens detected in three different types of UASB granules. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 29:77-84.
18. Kongjan P., Angelidaki I. Extreme thermophilic biohydrogen production from wheat straw hydrolysate by using mixed culture fermentation; optimizing the reactor configuration. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.024.
19. Kongjan P., O-Thong S., Kotay M., Min B., Angelidaki I. Biohydrogen production from wheat straw hydrolysate by dark fermentation using extreme thermophilic mixed culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 105:899-908.
20. Kongjan P., Min B., Angelidaki I. Biohydrogen production from xylose at extreme thermophilic temperatures (70°C) by mixed culture fermentation. Water Res. 2009, 43(5):1414-1424.
21. Koskinen P., Lay C., Puhakka J., Lin P., Wu S., Örlygsson J., Lin C. High-efficiency hydrogen production by an anaerobic, thermophilic enrichment culture from an Icelandic hot spring. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 101(4):665-678.
22. Kotsopoulos T., Zeng R., Angelidaki I. Biohydrogen Production in granular up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors with mixed cultures under hyper-thermophilic temperature (70°C). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 4(2):296-302.
23. Lane D.J. 16S/23 S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics 1991, 115-176. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. E. Stackebrandt, M. Goodfellow (Eds.).
24. Larsen J., Petersen M.Ø., Thirup L., Li H.W., Iversen F.K. The IBUS process-lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31(5):765-772.
25. Lee D., Ebie Y., Xu K., Li Y., Inamori Y. Continuous H2 and CH4 production from high-solid food waste in the two-stage thermophilic fermentation process with the recirculation of digester sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(1S):42-47.
26. Liu D., Liu D., Zeng R., Angelidaki I. Hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste in the two-stage fermentation process. Water Res. 2006, 40(11):2230-2236.
27. Lepistö R., Rintala J. Extreme thermophilic (70°C), VFA-fed UASB reactor: performance, temperature response, load potential and comparison with 35 and 55° UASB reactors. Water Res. 1999, 33(14):3162-3170.
28. Ljunggren M., Zacchi G. Techno-economic analysis of a two-step biological process producing hydrogen and methane. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(20):7780-7788.
29. Mussatto S., Dragone G., Roberto I. Influence of the toxic compounds present in brewer's spent grain hemicellulosic hydrolysate on xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii. Proc. Biochem. 2005, 40(12):3801-3806.
30. Muyzer G., Smalla K. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1998, 73(1):127-141.
31. Ohba M., Li Y.Y., Noike T. Analysis of microbial community in two-phase circulating process for hydrogen and methane fermentation. J. Jpn. Soc. Water Environ. 2006, 29(7):399-406.
32. O-Thong S., Prasertsan P., Intrasungkha N., Dhamwichukorn S., Birkeland N. Optimization of simultaneous thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production and COD reduction from palm oil mill effluent by Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2008, 33(4):1221-1231.
33. Stams A., Plugge C., de Bok F., Van Houten B., Lens P., Dijkman H., Weijma J. Metabolic interactions in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bioreactors. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52(1-2):13-20.
34. Tatara M., Yamazawa A., Ueno Y., Fukui H., Goto M., Sode K. High-rate thermophilic methane fermentation on short-chain fatty acids in a down-flow anaerobic packed-bed reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 27(2):105-113.
35. Weiss A., Jerome V., Freitag R., Mayer H.K. Diversity of the resident microbiota in a thermophilic municipal biogas plant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 81:163-173.
36. Yokoyama H., Moriya N., Ohmori H., Waki M., Ogino A., Tanaka Y. Community analysis of hydrogen-producing extreme thermophilic anaerobic microflora enriched from cow manure with five substrates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 77(1):213-222.
37. Zoetendal E.G., Akkermans A.D.L., Akkermans-van V.W., de Visser J., de Vos W.M. The host genotype affects the bacterial community in the human gastrointestinal tract. Microbiol. Ecol. Health Dis. 2001, 13(3):129-134.