Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 580-587

  Neşeli, Süleyman ^a   Yaldiz, Süleyman ^a   Türkeş, Erol ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Optimization; Response surface methodology; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

AISI 1040 STEEL; AVERAGE SURFACE ROUGHNESS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEVELOPED MODEL; DOMINANT FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; PREDICTION MODEL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SURFACE FINISHES; TOOL GEOMETRY; TOOL NOSE RADIUS; TURNING OPERATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 79151476554     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. P. Kumar, N. Singh, and P. Goel A multi-objective framework for design of vacuum-sealed molding process Robot. Computer Integr. Manuf. 15 1999 413 422
2. M.S. Lou, J.C. Chen, and C.M. Li Surface roughness prediction technique for CNC end-milling J. Ind. Technol. 15 1 1999
3. M.S. Lou, and J.C. Chen In process surface roughness recognition system in end-milling operations Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15 1999 200 209
4. F. Jack Chang-Xue, and W. David Xian-Feng Surface roughness predictive modeling: neural networks vs. regression IIE Trans. 35 1 2003 11 27
5. K. Bouacha, M.A. Yallese, T. Mabrouki, and J.-F. Rigal Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 28 2010 349 361
6. M.V. Kini, and A.M. Chincholkar Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate in finish turning of ±30° glass fibre reinforced polymer pipes Mater. Des. 31 2010 3590 3598
7. M.C. Cakir, C. Ensarioglu, and I. Demirayak Mathematical modeling of surface roughness for evaluating the effects of cutting parameters and coating material J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 2009 102 109
8. 3/TiC mixed ceramic tool based on the response surface methodology J. Mater. Process. Technol. 208 2008 532 541
9. D.I. Lalwani, N.K. Mehta, and P.K. Jain Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel J. Mater. Process. Technol. 206 2008 167 179
10. Y. Sahin, and A.R. Motorcu Surface roughness model in machining hardened steel with cubic boron nitride cutting tool Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 26 2 2008 84 90
11. M.J. Davidson, K. Balasubramanianb, and G.R.N. Tagorea Surface roughness prediction of flow-formed AA6061 alloy by design of experiments J. Mater. Process. Technol. 202 2008 41 46
12. H. Öktem, T. Erzurumlu, and H. Kurtaran Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness J. Mater. Process. Technol. 170 2005 11 16
13. M.Y. Noordin Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel J. Mater. Process. Technol. 145 2004 46 58
14. W.H. Yang, and Y.S. Tarng Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on Taguchi method J. Mater. Process. Technol. 84 1998 112 129
15. G.R. Dickinson, A survey of factors affecting surface finish, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Properties and Metrology of Surfaces, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, (UK), 3K, 1968, pp. 135-147.
16. D.J. Grieve, H. Kaliszer, G.W. Rowe, The effects of cutting conditions on bearing area parameters, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, 2, 1968, pp. 989-1004.
17. H.L. Fischer, and J.T. Elrod Surface finish as a function of tool geometry and feed: a theoretical approach Microtechnic 25 1971 175 178
18. M. Thomas, Y. Beauchamp, Y.A. Youssef, and J. Masounave An experimental design for surface roughness and built-up edge formation in lathe dry turning Int. J. Qual. Sci. 2 3 1997 167 180
19. D. Singh, and P.V. Rao A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 32 2007 1115 1124
20. I.A. Choudhury, and M.A. El-Baradie Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments J. Mater. Process. Technol. 67 1997 55 61
21. J.D. Thiele, and S.N. Melkote Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel J. Mater. Process. Technol. 94 1999 216 226
22. C.Y. Nian, W.H. Yang, and Y.S. Tarng Optimization of turning operations with multiple performance characteristics J. Mater. Process. Technol. 95 1999 90 96
23. W.S. Lin, B.Y. Lee, and C.L. Wu Modeling the surface roughness and cutting force for turning J. Mater. Process. Technol. 108 2001 286 293
24. H. Wang, S. To, C.Y. Chan, C.F. Cheung, and W.B. Lee A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tool-tip vibration and its influence upon surface generation in single-point diamond turning Int. J. Mach. Tools & Manuf. 50 2010 241 252
25. E. Oberg, and R.E. Green Machinery's Handbook 25th ed. 1996 Industrial Press Inc. New York
26. http://www.bohler.com.tr/2005/images/turning.pdf.
27. D.C. Montgomery Design and Analysis of Experiments fifth ed. 2001 John Wiley & Sons Inc.
28. J.S. Kwak Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45 2005 327 334
29. C.E. Walker, and A.M. Parkhurst Response surface analysis of bake-lab data with a personal computer Cereal Foods World 29 10 1984 662
30. K. Palanikumar, and R. Karthikeyan Optimal machining conditions for turning of particulate metal matrix composites using Taguchi and response surface methodologies Mach. Sci. Technol. 10 2006 417 433
31. G. Boothroyd, and W.A. Knight Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools third ed. 2006 CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group pp. 192-196
32. S. Neeli, and S. Yaldiz The effects of approach angle and rake angle due to chatter vibrations on surface roughness in turning J. Polytech. 10 4 2007 383 389