Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs

Genetics

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1247-1259

  Muir, William M ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELLBEING; ARTICLE; BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; BREEDING; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; FORESTRY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; LITTER SIZE; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT YIELD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; TECHNIQUE; TREE;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; BREEDING; COTURNIX; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTRY; MODELS, GENETIC; MORTALITY; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; COTURNIX JAPONICA;

EID: 23344450087     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.035956     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. CAMPO, J., and P. TAGARRO, 1977 Comparison of three selection methods for pupal weight in Tribolium castaneum. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9: 259-268.
2. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE, 1998 Concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Council Directive 98/58/EC. Official Journal L 221, 08/08/1998, pp. 0023-0027.
3. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE, 1999 Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Council Directive 1999/74/EC, Official Journal L 203, 03/08/1999, pp. 0053-0057.
4. CRAIG, D.M., 1982 Group selection vs. individual selection: an experimental analysis. Evolution 36: 271-282.
5. CRAIG, J. V., and W. M. MUIR, 1996 Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: beak-related mortality, feathering and body weight responses. Poult. Sci. 75: 294-302.
6. DENISON, R. F., E. T. KIERS and S. A. WEST, 2003 Darwinian agriculture: when can humans find solutions beyond the reach of natural selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 145-168.
7. DOOLITTLE, D., S. WILSON and L. HULBERT, 1972 A comparison of multiple trait selection methods in the mouse. J. Hered. 63: 366-372.
8. FALCONER, D. S., 1981 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ed. 2. Longman, New York.
9. FASOULA, D. A., and V. A. FASOULA, 1997 Competitive ability and plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 14: 89-138.
10. GALLAIS, A., 1976 Effects of competition on means, variances and covariances in quantitative genetics with application to general combining ability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 47: 189-195.
11. GARWOOD, V., and P. LOWE, 1979 Comparison of individual, sire family and index selection for short term rate of egg production in chickens. Poult. Sci. 58: 751-753.
12. GARWOOD, V. A., and P. LOWE, 1980 An experimental test of the efficiency of family selection in chickens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 56: 5-9.
13. GOODNIGHT, C. J., 1985 The influence of environmental variation on group and individual selection in a cress. Evolution 39: 545-558.
14. GRIFFING, B., 1967 Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 10: 127-139.
15. GRIFFING, B., 1969 Selection in reference to biological groups. IV. Application to selection index theory. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22: 131-142.
16. GRIFFING, B., 1976a Selection in reference to biological groups. V. Analysis of full-sib groups. Genetics 82: 703-722.
17. GRIFFING, B., 1976b Selection in reference to biological groups. VI. Use of extreme forms of nonrandom groups to increase selection efficiency. Genetics 82: 723-731.
18. GRIFFING, B., 1989 Genetic analysis of plant mixtures. Genetics 122: 943-956.
19. HAMILTON, W. D., 1964 The genetic evolution of social behavior. J. Theor. Biol 7: 1-16.
20. HENDERSON, C. R., 1985 Best linear unbiased prediction using relationship matrices derived from selected base-populations. J. Dairy Sci. 68: 443-448.
21. KESTEMONT, P., S. JOURDAN, M. HOUBART, C. MELARD, M. PASPATIS et al., 2003 Size heterogeneity, cannibalism and competition in cultured predatory fish larvae: biotic and abiotic influences. Aquaculture 227: 333-356.
22. KINNEY, JR., T., B. BOHREN, J. CRAIG and P. LOWE, 1970 Responses to individual, family or index selection for short term rate of egg production in chickens. Poult. Sci. 49: 1052-1064.
23. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
24. MAYNARD-SMITH, J., 1976 Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 51: 277-283.
25. MCCAULEY, D. E., and M. J. WADE, 1980 Group selection: the genotypic and demographic basis for the phenotypic differentiation of small populations of Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 34: 83-91.
26. MUIR, W. M., 1996 Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 75:447-458.
27. MUIR, W. M., 1997 Genetic selection-strategies for the future. Poult. Sci. 76: 1066-1070.
28. MUIR, W. M., 2000 The interaction of selection intensity, inbreeding depression, and random genetic drift on short- and long-term response to selection: results using finite locus and finite population size models incorporating directional dominance. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. (http://www.asas.org/0602.pdf).
29. PEREZENCISO, M., and M. TORO, 1992 Classical and mixed-model analysis of an index selection experiment for fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 2673-2681.
30. QUINTON, M., and C. SMITH, 1995 Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 2208-2212.
31. SAKAI, K. I., and H. MUKAIDE, 1966 Estimation of genetic, environmental, and competitional variances in standing forests. Silvae Genet. 16: 149-152.
32. SORENSEN, D. A., and B. W. KENNEDY, 1986 Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. J. Anim. Sci. 63: 245-258.
33. SPILKE, J., and E. GROENEVELD, 1994 Comparison of four multivariate REML (co)variance component estimation packages. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, Vol. 22, pp. 11-14.
34. VAN TASSELL, C. P., and L. D. VAN VLECK, 1996 Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co) variance component inference. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 2586-2597.
35. WADE, M. J., 1976 Group selection among laboratory populations of Tribolium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73: 4604-4607.
36. WADE, M. J., 1977 An experimental study of group selection. Evolution 31: 134-153.
37. WADE, M. J., 1978 A critical review of the models of group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 53: 101-114.
38. WADE, M. J., and D. E. MCCAULEY, 1980 Group selection: the phenotypic and genotypic differentiation of small populations. Evolution 34: 799-812.
39. WANG, C. S., J. J. RUTLEDGE and D. GIANOLA, 1993 Marginal inferences about variance components in a mixed linear model using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 25: 41-62.
40. WILLIAMS, G. C., 1966 Adaptations and Natural Selection, pp. 1-14. Princeton University Press/Aldine-Atherton, Princeton, NJ/Chicago.
41. WILSON, S. P., 1974 An experimental comparison of individual, family and combination selection. Genetics 76: 823-836.
42. WILSON, D. S., 1983 The group selection controversy and current status. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 159-187.
43. WRIGHT, A. J., 1977 Predictions of non-linear responses to selection for forage yield under competition. Theor. Appl. Genet. 49: 201-207.
44. WYNNE-EDWARDS, V. C., 1986 Evolution Through Group Selection. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.