In vivo assessment of tissue compatibility and functionality of a polyimide cuff electrode for recording afferent peripheral nerve signals

Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 212-219

  Hiebl, B ^a   Bog, S ^b   Mikut, R ^c   Bauer, C ^c   Gemeinhardt, O ^d   Jung, F ^a   Kruger T ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^e INOMED MEDIZINTECHNIK GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cuff sensor; Functional electric stimulation; Neural damage; Peripheral nerve; Polyimide

Indexed keywords

EOSIN; FIBRIN; HEMATOXYLIN; POLYIMIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; FOREIGN BODY; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; MYELINATED NERVE; NERVOUS TISSUE; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCIATIC NERVE; SIGNAL DETECTION; TISSUE REACTION;

EID: 78951473175     PISSN: 09205268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Sahin M et al. Spiral nerve cuff electrode for recordings of respiratory output. J ApplPhysiol 1997; 83 (1): 317-322
2. Haugland KH, Hoffer JA. Slip information provided by nerve cuff signals: Application in closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1994; 2: 29-36
3. Haugland HK, Sinkjaer T. Cutaneous whole nerve recordings used for correction of footdrop in hemiplegic man. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1995; 3: 307-317
4. Naples GG et al. A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; 35 (11): 905-916
5. Nikolic ZM et al. Instrumentation for ENG and EMG recordings in FES systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994; 41 (7): 703-706
6. Popovic DB et al. Sensory nerve recording for closed-loop control to restore motor functions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993; 40 (10): 1024-1031
7. Sahin M, Durand DM, Haxhiu MA. Whole nerve recordings with the spiral nerve cuff electrode. in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1994. Baltimore IEEE
8. Stein RB et al. Principles underlying new methods for chronic neural recording. Can J Neurol Sci 1975; 2 (3): 235-244
9. Stein RB et al. Stable long-term recordings from cat peripheral nerves. Brain Res 1977; 128 (1): 21-38
10. Stein RB, Pearson KG. Predicted amplitude and form of action potentials recorded from unmyelinated nerve fibres. J Theor Biol 1971; 32 (3): 539-558
11. Demosthenous A, Triantis IF. An adaptive ENG amplifier for tripolar cuff electrodes. IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits 2005; 40 (2): 412-421
12. Stieglitz T, Klausmann D, Krueger TB. Development of a simple low noise amplifier for recording of sensory mass signals from peripheral nerves. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2009; 54 (1): 1-7
13. Albrecht W et al. Preparation of highly asymmetric hollow fiber membranes from poly(ether imide) by a modified dry-wet phase inversion technique using a triple spinneret. Journal of Membrane Science 2005; 262 (1-2): 69-80
14. Altankov G et al. On the tissue compatibility of poly(ether imide) membranes: an in vitro study on their interaction with human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Journal of Biomaterials Science-Polymer Edition 2005; 16 (1): 23-42
15. Trimpert C et al. Poly(ether imide) membranesmodified with poly(ethylene imine) as potential carriers for epidermal substitutes. Macromolecular Bioscience 2006; 6 (4): 274-284
16. Shamma-Donoghue SA et al. Thin-film multielectrode arrays for a cochlear prosthesis. IEEE T Electron Dev 1982; 29 (1): 136-144
17. Boppart SA, Wheeler BC, Wallace CS. A flexible perforated microelectrode array forextended neural recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39 (1): 37-42
18. Stieglitz T et al. Micromachined, polyimidebased devices for flexible neural interfaces. Biomed Microdevices 2000; 2 (4): 283-294
19. Rubehn B et al. A MEMS-based flexible multichannelECoG-electrode array. J Neural Eng 2009; 6 (3): 036003
20. Grill WM, Veraart C, Mortimer JT. Selective activation of peripheral nerve fascicles: use of field steering currents. in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1991
21. Grill WM, Mortimer JT. Electrical impedance of electrode encapsulation tissue. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992
22. Kumar S et al. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1991; 13 (1-2): 63-67
23. Mulisch M, Welsch U (Eds.). Mikroskopische Technik. 18 ed. 2010, Spectrum: Baltimore
24. Mikut R et al. The open source Matlab toolbox Gait-CAD and its application to bioelectric signal processing. in DGBMT-Workshop Biosignal Analysis. 2008. Potsdam
25. http://sourceforge.net/projects/gait-cad/
26. Wood NK, Kaminski EJ, Oglesby Rj. The significance of implant shape in experimental testing of biological materials: disc vs. rod. J Biomed Mater Res 1970; 4 (1): 1-12
27. Matlaga BF, Yasenchak LP, Salthouse TN. Tissue response to implanted polymers: the significance of sample shape. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 10 (3): 391-397
28. Taylor SR, Gibbons DF. Effect of surface texture of the soft tissue response to polymerimplants. J Biomed Mater Res 1983; 17: 205-227
29. Lago N et al. Assessment of biocompatibility of chronically implanted polyimide and platinum intrafascicular electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54 (2): 281-290
30. Klinge PM et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of axonal sprouting and reactive tissue changes after long-term implantation of a polyimide sieve electrode to the transected adult rat sciatic nerve. Biomaterials 2001; 22 (17): 2333-2343
31. Richardson RR Jr., Miller JA, Reichert WM. Polyimides as biomaterials: preliminary biocompatibility testing. Biomaterials 1993; 14 (8): 627-635
32. Sun Y et al. Assessment of the biocompatibility of photosensitive polyimide for implantable medical device use. J Biomed Mater Res-A 2008; 90 (3): 648-655
33. McNamara A, Williams DF. The response to the intramuscular implantation of pure metals. Biomaterials 1981; 2 (1): 33-40
34. Stensaas SS, Stensaas LJ. Histopathological evaluation of materials implanted in the cerebral cortex. Acta Neuropathol 1978; 41 (2): 145-155
35. Anderson J. Mechanisms of inflammation and infection wth implanted devices. Cardiovasc Pathol 1993; 2 (3): 33S-41S
36. Lefurge T et al. Chronically implanted intrafascicular recording electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng 1991; 19 (2): 197-207
37. Grandjean PA, Mortimer JT. Recruitment properties of monopolar and bipolar epimysial electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng 1986; 14 (1): 53-66
38. Hiebl B et al. Tissue Integration of Two Different Shape-Memory Polymers with Poly(ε- caprolactone) Switching Segment in Rats. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 2009; 1140: 143-149
39. Lendlein A et al. Shape-memory polymers as a technology platform for biomedical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7 (3): 357-379
40. Behl M, Razzaq MY, Lendlein A. Multifunctional Shape-memory Polymers. Advanced Materials 2010; 22 (31): 3388-3410