Improving morphology induction by learning spelling rules

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1531-1536

  Naradowsky, Jason ^a   Goldwater, Sharon ^b  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; MORPHOLOGY;

BAYESIAN MODEL; SUB-STRINGS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78751699019     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. R. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, and L. Gulikers. The CELEX lexical database (release 2), 1995.
2. N. Chomsky and M. Halle. The Sound Pattern of English. Longman Higher Education, 1968.
3. M. Creutz and K. Lagus. Inducing the morphological lexicon of a natural language from unannotated text. In Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2005.
4. S. Dasgupta and V. Ng. Unsupervised morphological parsing of Bengali. Language Resources and Evaluation, 40((3-4)), 2006.
5. S. Dasgupta and V. Ng. High-performance, language-independent morphological segmentation. In Proceedings of (NAACL-HLT), 2007.
6. D. Freitag. Morphology induction from term clusters. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONLL '05), 2005.
7. A. Gelman, J. Carlin, H. Stern, and D. Rubin. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, 2004.
8. W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, Suffolk, 1996.
9. J. Goldsmith. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics, 27:153-198, 2001.
10. J. Goldsmith. An algorithm for the unsupervised learning of morphology. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 12(3):1-19, 2006.
11. S. Goldwater and M. Johnson. Priors in Bayesian learning of phonological rules. In Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON '04), 2004.
12. S. Goldwater and D. Mc-Closky. Improving statistical MT through morphological analysis. In Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Vancouver, 2005.
13. S. Goldwater, T. Griffiths, and M. Johnson. Interpolating between types and tokens by estimating power-law generators. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, 2006.
14. L. Larkey, L. Ballesteros, and M. Connell. Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: Light stemming and co-occurrence analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 275-282, 2002.
15. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):331-330, 1993.
16. Thomas P. Minka. Estimating a Dirichlet distribution. http://research.microsoft.com/ minka/papers/dirichlet/, 2003.
17. C. Monson, A. Lavie, J. Carbonell, and L. Levin. Unsupervised induction of natural language morphology inflection classes. In Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology (SIGPHON '04), pages 52-61, 2004.
18. J. Pierrehumbert. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay, and S. Jannedy, editors, Probabilistic linguistics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.