Is research safe in their hands?

BMJ

Volumn 342, Issue 7790, 2011, Pages 206-

  Marcovitch, Harvey ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELECOXIB; MEASLES MUMPS RUBELLA VACCINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OPIATE DERIVATIVE; PREGABALIN;

DRUG RESEARCH; FRAUD; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SHORT SURVEY;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 78751697934     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d284     Document Type: Short Survey

References (11)

1. Angell M. Drug companies & doctors: a story of corruption. New York Review of Books. www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies- doctorsastory-of-corruption/.
2. Pincock S. Lancet study faked. Scientist. www.the-scientist.com/news/ display/22952.
3. Marcus A. Fraud case rocks anesthesiology community. www. anesthesiologynews.com/printview.asp?article-id=12634&view=print accessed 31.12.10.
4. Shafer S. Notice of retraction. Anesth & Analgesia 2010;111:1567.
5. Nylenna M, Simonsen S. Scientific misconduct: a new approach to prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1882-3. (Pubitemid 43831979)
6. Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 2009;4:e5738.
7. Deer B. The Lancet 's two days to bury bad news. BMJ 2011;342:c7001.
8. Marcovitch H. Research misconduct; can Australia learn from the UK's stuttering system? Med J Aust 2006;185:616-61. (Pubitemid 46070937)
9. UK Research Integrity Office. Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research. www.ukrio.org/resources/ UKRIO%20Procedure%20for%20the%20Investigation%20of%20Misconduct%20in%20Research. pdf.
10. Dillner L. UK needs new health research agency to speed up approval process. BMJ 2011;342:d185.
11. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040923.