Scientific misconduct: a new approach to prevention

Lancet

Volumn 367, Issue 9526, 2006, Pages 1882-1884

  Nylenna, Magne ^a   Simonsen, Sigmund ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; ETHICS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 33744807791     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68821-1     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. In: Lock S., Wells F., and Farthing M. (Eds). Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research (2001), BMJ Books, London
2. Parry J. Korean cloning studies were fakes. BMJ 332 (2006) 67
3. Farthing M., Horton R., and Smith R. UK's failure to act on research misconduct. Lancet 356 (2000) 2030
4. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 14 (1985) 32-38
5. Rose G., and Day S. The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. BMJ 301 (1990) 1031-1034
6. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine (1992), Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Charlton B. A critique of Geoffrey Rose's 'population strategy' for preventive medicine. J R Soc Med 88 (1995) 607-610
8. Manuel D., Lim J., Tanuseputro P., et al. Revisiting Rose: strategies for reducing coronary heart disease. BMJ 332 (2006) 659-662
9. Martinson B., Anderson M., and de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435 (2005) 737-738
10. Flanagin A., Carey L., Fontanarosa P., et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 280 (1998) 222-224