A quantitative analysis of biodiversity and the recreational value of potential national parks in Denmark

Environmental Management

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 685-695

  Larsen, Frank Wugt ^a   Petersen, Anders Højgård ^a   Strange, Niels ^a   Lund, Mette Palitzsch ^a   Rahbek, Carsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Denmark; Ecosystem service; National parks; Recreational value; Systematic conservation planning

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; NATIONAL PARKS; RECREATIONAL VALUE; SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING;

CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; PARKS; PLANNING; RECREATIONAL FACILITIES;

BIODIVERSITY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; NATIONAL PARK; OUTDOOR RECREATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SYNERGISM;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; DENMARK; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NATIONAL PARK; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DENMARK; PILOT PROJECTS; RECREATION;

DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 42449142258     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9085-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Balmford A (2003) Conservation planning in the real world: South Africa shows the way. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:435-438
2. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 4:2138-2152
3. Church RL, Stoms DM, Davis FW (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76:105-112
4. European Economic Community (1979) Bird protection directive. Council directive on protection of wild birds (DIR/79/409/EEC, April 2, 1979)
5. Danish Agency for Spatial and Environmental Planning (2008) Available at: http://www.blst.dk/. Accessed: February 11, 2008
6. European Economic Community (1992) Habitat directive. Council Directive on conservation of natural and semi-natural habitat types and wild animals and plants (DIR 92/43/EEC, May 21, 1992)
7. Faith DP, Margules CR, Walker PA, Stein J, Natera G (2001) Practical application of biodiversity surrogates and percentage targets for conservation in Papua New Guinea. Pacific Conservation Biology 6:289-303
8. Faith DP, Williams KJ (2006) Research needs and challenges for the "systematic conservation planning" approach to the 2010 biodiversity target. In: Young J, Ahlbeg M, Niemelä N, Parr T, Pauleit S, Watt AD (eds) Actions for the 2010 biodiversity target in Europe - how does research contribute to halting biodiversity loss? Report of an e-conference, pp 27-29
9. Jensen FS (2003) Recreational values in 592 forests and other nature areas. Skovbrugsserien nr. 32, Skov & Landskab, Hørsholm (in Danish). Available at: http://www.sl.kvl.dk/Publikationer/Udgivelser/ RaadgivningsPublikationer/SKB32.aspx?katid. Accessed: March 2006
10. Lund MP (2002) Performance of the species listed in the European community 'Habitats' directive as indicators of species richness in Denmark. Environmental Science and Policy 22:1-8
11. Lund MP, Rahbek C (2002) Cross-taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Animal Conservation 5:163-171
12. Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biologic Conservation 43:63-76
13. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253
14. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
15. Moffett A, Sarkar S (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12:125-137
16. Moore J, Balmford A, Allnutt T, Burgess N (2004) Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa. Biological Conservation 117:343-350
17. Petersen AH, Larsen FW, Rahbek C, Strange N, Lund MP (2005) Nature values in Danish national parks - a quantitative analysis of biodiversity in potential national parks in Denmark (in Danish). Center for Macroecology, University of Copenhagen. Available at: http://www.macroecology.ku.dk/nationalparks/ Naturværdier_i_nationalparker.pdf. Accessed: July 2006
18. Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 209:347-350
19. Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:124-128
20. Pressey RL (1998) Algorithms, politics, and timber: an example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests. In: Wills R, Hobbs T (eds) Ecology for everyone: communicating ecology to scientists, the public, and politicians. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney, Australia, pp. 73-87
21. Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, et al. (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:123-159
22. Skov-Petersen H (2002) GIS, assessibility and physical planning - exemplified by models of recreational activities. Doctoral thesis. Department of Forest and Landscape, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University/Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
23. Stoltze M, Pihl S (eds) (1998) The Danish red data book 1997. Danish Ministry of the Environment, The National Environmental Research Institute and Danish Forest and Nature Agency, Denmark
24. The Danish Government (2004) Action plan for biodiversity and nature conservation in Denmark 2004-2009. Danish Ministry of the Environment. Available at: http://www.skovognatur.dk/NR/rdonlyres/40B7E2A9-A683-4FC1-8C97- F052F6F5B4B8/5402/ActionPlan_300604.pdf. Accessed: March 2006
25. The Danish Society for Nature Conservation (2004) The future of nature in Denmark [in Danish]. Danmarks Naturfredningsforening and Forlaget Rhodos, København, Denmark
26. The Wilhjelm Committee (2001) A rich nature in a rich society [in Danish]. Available at: http://www2.skovognatur.dk/udgivelser/2002/87-7279-378-3/ pdf/helepubl.pdf. Accessed April 2006
27. United Nations Environment Programme (2002) Report on the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP/CBD/COP/6/20/Part 2) Strategic Plan Decision VI/26 (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2002). Available at: http://www.biodiv.org/doc/meetings/ cop/cop-06/official/cop-06-20-part2-en.pdf. Accessed: March 2006
28. Williams PH (1998) Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace GM, Balmford A, Ginsberg JR (eds) Conservation in a changing world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 211-249
29. Williams, PH (2000) WORLDMAP iv WINDOWS: software and help document 4.2. London: distributed privately and available at: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/ projects/worldmap
30. Williams PH, Burgess N, Rahbek C (2000) Flagship species, ecological complementarity, and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub-Saharan Africa. Animal Conservation 3:249-260
31. Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, et al. (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1641-1661