Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and of the native coronary arteries;Accuratezza diagnostica della TC multidetettore a 64 strati nella valutazione non invasiva dei bypass aorto-coronarici e della progressione di malattia nel circolo nativo

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 115, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1167-1178

  Romagnoli, A ^a   Patrei, A ^a   Mancini, A ^a   Arganini, C ^a   Vanni, S ^a   Sperandio, M ^a   Simonetti, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary CT; Multislice computed tomography; Noninvasive coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78751650460     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0580-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. G.M. Fitz Gibbon A.J. Leach H.P. Kafka, et al. 1991 Coronary bypass graft fate: long-term angiographic study J Am Coll Cardiol 17 1075 1080 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7nvVWltQ%3D%3D 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90834-V
2. K. Eagle R.A. Guyton R. Davidoff, et al. 1999 ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery) J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1262 1347 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvkvFWhuw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00389-7 10520819 (Pubitemid 29500568)
3. A.A. Cameron K.B. Davis W.J. Rogers 1995 Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study J Am Coll Cardiol 26 895 899 1:STN:280: DyaK28%2Fgslehuw%3D%3D 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00280-4 7560614
4. T. Schlosser T. Konorza P. Hunold, et al. 2004 Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 44 1224 1229 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.075 15364323 (Pubitemid 39213969)
5. C.J. Pepine H.D. Allen T.M. Bashore, et al. 1991 ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization Circulation 84 2213 2247 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FjsFCktA%3D%3D 1934395
6. P.J. Scanlon D.P. Faxon A.M. Audet, et al. 1999 ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1756 1824 1:STN:280: DyaK1M3msFKhtw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00126-6 10334456
7. G. Vergara 2001 L'emodinamica con i sistemi portatili di nuova generazione:rapporti costi-benefici Ital Heart J Suppl 2 25
8. D. Ropers S. Ulzheimer E. Wenkel, et al. 2001 Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction Am J Cardiol 88 792 795 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrktlCnsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01855-0 11589852
9. K. Anders U. Baum M. Schmid, et al. 2006 Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution sub-millimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography Eur J Radiol 57 336 344 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.018 16446072 (Pubitemid 43254912)
10. F. Cademartiri R. Marano G. Luccichenti, et al. 2004 Anatomia normale del circolo coronarico con TC multistrato a 16 canali Radiol Med 107 11 21 15031693
11. C. Burgstahler T. Beck A. Kuettner, et al. 2006 Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-row multi-slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution Int J Cardiol 106 244 249 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005. 02.017 16321698 (Pubitemid 41728944)
12. E. Martuscelli A. Romagnoli A. D'Eliseo, et al. 2004 Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography Circulation 110 3234 3238 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crnt1WhtQ%3D%3D 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147277.52036. 07 15533862 (Pubitemid 39525071)
13. N. Stauder A. Kuettner S. Schroder, et al. 2006 Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT Eur Radiol 16 2512 2520 10.1007/s00330-006-0268-4 16670866 (Pubitemid 44649700)
14. K.M. Detre E. Wright M.L. Murphy, et al. 1975 Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms Circulation 52 979 986 1:STN:280: DyaE28%2Fkt1aitg%3D%3D 1102142
15. R.J. Gibbons G.J. Balady J.T. Bricker, et al. 2002 ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing) Circulation 106 1883 1892 10.1161/01.CIR. 0000034670.06526.15 12356646
16. N.I. Stauder B. Klumpp H. Stauder, et al. 2007 Assessment of coronary artery by-pass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging BJR 80 975 983 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjhvFCjsA%3D%3D 10.1259/bjr/26167398 17967847
17. L.P. Salm J.J. Bax J.W. Jukema, et al. 2005 Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography Am Heart J 150 775 781 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.029 16209981 (Pubitemid 41396514)
18. R. Leta F. Carreras X. Alomar, et al. 2004 Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16 multidetector-row spiral computed tomography: a comparative study with invasive coronary angiography Rev Esp Cardiol 57 217 224 10.1157/13059103 15056425 (Pubitemid 38594206)
19. F. Crusco A. Antoniella V. Papa, et al. 2007 Evidence based medicine: role of multidetector CT in the follow up of patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafts Radiol Med 112 509 525 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svhsVOnsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s11547-007-0158-0 17563851 (Pubitemid 47039149)
20. S. Schroeder A.F. Kopp A. Kuettner, et al. 2002 Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients Clin Imag 26 106 111 10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00371-0 (Pubitemid 34168173)
21. K. Nieman B.J. Rensing R.J. van Geuns, et al. 2002 Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate Heart 88 470 474 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nisVWntg%3D%3D 10.1136/heart.88.5.470 12381635 (Pubitemid 35221956)
22. G.M. Feuchtner T. Schachner J. Bonatti, et al. 2007 Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 574 580 10.2214/AJR.07.2174 17715103 (Pubitemid 47328538)
23. L. Desbiolles S. Leschka A. Plass, et al. 2007 Evaluation of temporal windows for coronary artery bypass graft imaging with 64-slice CT Eur Radiol 17 2819 2828 10.1007/s00330-007-0693-z 17639408 (Pubitemid 47603977)
24. G. Pache U. Saueressig A. Frydrychowicz, et al. 2006 Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts Eur Heart J 27 976 980 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi824 16527826
25. C. Auguadro M. Manfredi F. Scalise, et al. 2009 Multislice computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: comparison with traditional angiography J Cardiovasc Med 10 454 460 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283262c85
26. I. Nazeri P. Shahabi M. Tehrai, et al. 2009 Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography Am J Cardiol 103 67 73 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.040