Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by magnetic resonance imaging

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 80, Issue 960, 2007, Pages 975-983

  Stauder, Norbert I ^a,b   Klumpp, B ^b   Stauder, H ^c   Blumenstock, G ^b   Fenchel, M ^b   Kuttner A ^d   Claussen, C D ^b   Miller, S ^b  

^a Kantonsspital Muensterlingen   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Internal Medicine Kantonsspital   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIPYRIDAMOLE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; REST; REVASCULARIZATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENOSIS; STRESS; VEIN GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; EVALUATION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RESTENOSIS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

AGED; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; DIPYRIDAMOLE; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULAR PATENCY; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 38349064797     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/26167398     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1983;5: 951-60.
2. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;9:248-58.
3. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts - effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996;334: 216-9.
4. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, van Geuns R-JM, de Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003;229:749-56.
5. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1224-9.
6. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Tomassini M, Razzini C, Sperandio M, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110:3234-8.
7. Rubinstein RI, Askenase AD, Thickman D, Feldman MS, Agarwal JB, Helfant RH. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. Circulation 1987;76:786-91.
8. Aurigemma GP, Reichek L, Axel L, Schiebler M, Harris C, Kressel HY. Noninvasive determination of coronary artery bypass graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1989;80:1595-602.
9. Wintersperger BJ, Engelmann MG, von-Smekal A, Knez A, Penzkofer HV, Hofling B, et al. Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography: value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique. Radiology 1998;208:345-51.
10. Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Alibadi DA, Shetty AN, Safian R, Simonetti O. Contrast-Enhanced breath-hold mr angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1073-80.
11. Stauder NI, Fenchel M, Stauder H, Küttner A, Scheule AM, Kramer U, et al. Assessment of minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft (MIDCAB) of the left internal mammary artery by magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:607-14.
12. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, Kunz P, et al. Detection of vein graft disease using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 2002;105:328-33.
13. Debatin JF, Strong JA, Sostman HD, Negro-Vilar R, Paine SS, Douglas JM, et al. MR characterization of blood flow in native and grafted internal mammary Arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:443-50.
14. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Cruz BP, Shimono T, Tokui T, Yada I, et al. MR flow measurement in the internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with graft stenosis at radiographic angiography. Radiology 2001;220:441-7.
15. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Kunz P, Zwinderman AH, Lamb HJ, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation 2003;107:1502-8.
16. Galjee MA, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, Hofman MBM, Falke THM, Visser CA. Quantification of coronary artery bypass graft flow by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Magn Reson Imag 1996;14:485-93.
17. Langerak SE, Kunz P, Vliegen HW, Lamb HJ, Jukema JW, van Der Wall EE, et al. Improved MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts during adenosine-induced stress. Radiology 2001;218:540-7.
18. Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Campeau L, Gillespie MJ, McConney M, Lesperance J. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation 1985;72: V71-8.
19. Takagi T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, Akasaka T. Noninvasive assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency using duplex Doppler echocardiography from supraclavicular fossa. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1647-52.
20. Bach RG, Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, Caracciolo EA. Comparison of phasic blood flow velocity characteristics of arterial and venous coronary artery bypass conduits. Circulation 1993;88:II-133-40.
21. Crowley JJ, Shapiro LM. Noninvasive assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency using transthoracic echocardiography. Circulation 1995;92:1125-30.
22. Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PMT, Buis B, van der Geest, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:845-8.
23. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuettner A, Heuschmid M, Kopp AF, Schroder S, et al. Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003;175: 1051-5.
24. Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dorn C, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Dahm JB. Predialing the number of cinegraphic frames enables an effective patient dose due to coronary angiography of 0.8 mSv. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003;175:1706-10.