The impact of trust on the relationship between inter-organisational collaboration and product innovation performance

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-74

  Lai, Chi Shiun ^a   Chen, Chun Shou ^b   Chiu, Chih Jen ^a   Pai, Da Chang ^c  

^a NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b HSIUPING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNG CHOU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

External organisation involvement; New product development; Product innovation performance; Trust

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

TAIWAN;

EID: 78751633556     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537107     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aiken, L., and S.G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Alexander, E.R. 1993. Interorganizational coordination: Theory and practices. Journal of Planning Literature 7, no. 4: 328-43.
3. Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, no. 3: 411-23.
4. Bagozzi, R.P., and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16, no. 1: 74-94.
5. Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 6: 1173-82.
6. Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004. R&D cooperation and firm performance. Research Policy 33, no. 10: 1477-92.
7. Bendis, R.A., R.S. Seline, and E.J. Byler. 2008. A new direction for technology-based economic development: The role of innovation intermediaries. Industry & Higher Education 22, no. 2: 73-80.
8. Clark, K.B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product development performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Cordero, R. 1990. The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview. Research Policy 19: 185-92.
10. De Luca, L.M.D, and K. Atuahene-Gima. 2007. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing 71, no. 1: 95-112.
11. Douglas, S.P., and C.S. Craig. 1983. International marketing research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Dwyer, F.R, P.H. Schurr, and S. Oh. 1987. Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 51, no. 1: 11-27.
13. Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39-50.
14. Gadde, L.-E. and I. Snehota, 2000. Making the most of supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 29: 305-16.
15. Gemunden, H.G., P. Heydebreck, and R. Herden. 1992. Technological interweavement a means of achieving innovation success. R&D Management 22: 359-76.
16. Gerbing, D.W., and J.C. Anderson. 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research 25, no. 2: 186-92.
17. Griffin, A., and A.L. Page. 1996. PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13, no. 6: 478-96.
18. Hitt, M.A., R.E. Ireland, and R.E. Hoskisson. 2003. Strategic management - competitiveness and globalization. Eagan, MN:West Publishing.
19. Jaworski, B.J., and A.K. Kohli. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing 57: 53-70.
20. Langerak, F., E.J. Hultink, and H.S.J. Robben. 2004. The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on newproduct performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21, no. 2: 79-94.
21. Lim, J-S, T.W. Sharkey, and J.H. Heinrichs. 2003. New product development practices and export involvement: A initial inquiry. International Journal Innovation Management 7, no. 4: 475-99.
22. Lynch, P., and T. O'Toole. 2006. Involving external users and third parties in the new product development process. Irish Marketing Review 18, no. 1: 29-37.
23. Nunnally, J.C., and I.H. Berstein. 1994. Psychometric theory. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
24. Petersen, K.J., R.B. Handfield, and G.L. Ragatz. 2005. Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process, and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management 23, nos. 3-4: 371-388.
25. Ragatz, G., R. Handfield, and K. Petersen. 2002. Benefits associated with supplier integration into newproduct development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research 55, no. 5: 389-400.
26. Robbins, S.P. 1990. Organization theory: Structure, design and application. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Selnes, F., and J. Sallis. 2003. Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing 67, no. 3: 80-95.
28. Sherman, J.D., W.E. Souder, and S.A. Jenssen. 2000. Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17, no. 4: 257-67.
29. Song, M., and A.D. Benedetto. 2008. Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management 26, no. 1: 1-22.
30. von Hippel, E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy 5: 212-39.
31. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
32. Wallin, M.W., and G. von Krogh. 2010. Organizing for open innovation: Focus on the integration of knowledge. Organizational Dynamics 39, no. 2:145-54.
33. Walter, A. 2003. Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development. Journal of Business Research 56: 721-33.
34. Wynstra, F., A. van Weele, and M. Weggemann. 2001. Managing supplier involvement in product development: Three critical issues. European Management Journal 19: 157-67.