Breast ultrasound in office gynecology - Ten years of experience

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Lenz, S ^a  

^a Gynecologic Clinic   (Denmark)

Author keywords

breast; malignancy; screening; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; DENMARK; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PALPATION; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; REGISTER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY CARE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REGISTRIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 78751630103     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245426     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sundhedsstatistik. Danish Cancer Registry. Available at: http://www.sst.dk
2. Kösters J P., Gøtzsche P C. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Chister, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2003 The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 2. Art. No.:CD 003 373.
3. Miller A B., Baines C J., To T et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 - 49 years. CMAJ 1992 147 1459-1476
4. Miller A B., Baines C J., To T et al. Canadian national Breast Screening Study 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 - 59 years. CMAJ 1992 147 1477-1488
5. Bobo J K., Lee N C., Thames S F. Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. JNatl Cancer Inst 2000 92 971-976
6. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR 1999 173 921-927
7. Kolb T M., Lichy J, Newhouse J H. Comparison of the performance of Screening mammography, Physical Examination, and breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations. Radiology 2002 225 165-175
8. Flobbe K, Nelemans P J., Kessels A G. et al. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2002 38 1044-1050
9. Lenz S. Office ultrasound screening for breast cancer. JMed Ultrasound 2005 13 153. Letter to the editor
10. Danish Pathology Data Bank. http://www.patobank.dk
11. Rosenberg R D., Hunt W C., Williamson M R. et al. Effect of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, new Mexico. Radiology 1998 209 511-518
12. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin S M. et al. Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. AMA 1995 273 149-154
13. Carney P A., Miglioretti D L., Yankaskas B C. et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003 138 168-175
14. Brekelmans C T., Collette H J., Collette C et al. Breast cancer after a negative screen: follow-up of women participating in the DOM Screening Programme. Eur J Cancer 1992 28A 893-895
15. Cid J A., Rampaul R S., Ellis I O. et al. Woman feels breast lump - surgeon cannot: the role of ultrasound in arbitration. Eur J Cancer 2004 40 2053-2055
16. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Houssami N. Evidence relevant to the investigation of breast symptoms: the triple test. The Breast 2003 11 215-220
17. Hou M F., Chuang H Y., OU-Yang F et al. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening of breast cancer in Taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002 28 415-420