Robust sensory gating in the cortical visual evoked potential using two spatially separated stimuli

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 588-593

  Gawne, Timothy J ^a   Osbourne, Tiana S ^b   Risner, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b OAKWOOD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human; Linearity; Local field potential; Multifocal; Sensory gating; Striate cortex; VEP; Volume conduction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SENSORY GATING; SPATIAL MEMORY; STIMULUS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BLINKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY GATING; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78751625157     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adler L.E., Pachtman E., Franks R., Pecevich M., Waldo M.C., Freedman R. Neurophysiological evidence for a deficit in inhibitor mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiat 1982, 17:639-654.
2. Adler L.E., Waldo M., Freedman R. Neurophysiological studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: comparison of auditory and visual responses. Biol Psychiat 1985, 20:1284-1296.
3. Barrett G., Blumhardt L., Halliday A.M., Halliday E., Kriss A. A paradox in the lateralization of the visual evoked response. Nature 1976, 261:155-253.
4. Bringuier V., Chavane F., Glaeser L., Frégnac Y. Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. Science 1999, 283:695-699.
5. DiRusso F., Martinez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., Hilyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 15:95-111.
6. Doty R.W. Potentials evoked in cat cerebral cortex by diffuse and by punctiform photic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1958, 21:437-464.
7. Ebersole J.S., Kaplan B.J. Intracortical evoked potentials of cats elicited by punctate visual stimuli in receptive field peripheries. Brain Res 1981, 224:1601-1664.
8. Fahle M., Bach M. Origin of the visual evoked potentials. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed. J.R. Heckenlively, G.B. Arden (Eds.).
9. Fortune B., Hood D.C. Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003, 44:1364-1375.
10. Gawne T.J. The local and non-local components of the local field potential in awake primate visual cortex. J Comput Neurosci 2010, 10.1007/s10827-010-0223-x.
11. Gjini K., Sundarasen K., Boutros N.N. Electroencephaolographic evidence of sensory gating in the occipital cortex. Neuroreport 2008, 19:1519-1522.
12. Hong L.E., Summerfelt A., Mitchell B.D., McMahon R.P., Wonodi I., Buchanan R.W., Gunvant K., Thaker K. Sensory gating endophenotype based on its neural oscillatory pattern and heritability estimate. Arch Gen Psychiat 2008, 65:1008-1016.
13. Kasamtsu T., Mizobe K., Sutter E. Muscimol and baclofen differentially suppress retinotopic and nonretinotopic responses in visual cortex. Visual Neurosci 2005, 22:839-858.
14. Kitano M., Niiyama K., Kasamatsu T., Sutter E.E., Norcia A.M. Retinotopic and nonretinotopic field potentials in cat visual cortex. Visual Neurosci 1994, 11:953-977.
15. Kitano M., Kasamatsu T., Norcia A.M., Sutter E.E. Spatially distributed responses induced by contrast reversal in cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 1995, 104:279-309.
16. Lee J., Williford T., Maunsell J.H. Spatial attention and the latency and the neuronal responses in macaque area V4. J Neurosci 2007, 27:9632-9637.
17. Levick W.R. Variations in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res 1973, 13:837-853.
18. Mitchell J.D., Hansen S., McInnes A., Campbell F.W. The recovery cycle of the pattern visual evoked potential in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983, 56:309-315.
19. Mitzdorf U. Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol Rev 1985, 65:37-100.
20. Nauhaus I., Busse L., Carandini M., Ringach D.L. Stimulus contrast modulates functional connectivity in visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12:70-76.
21. Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG, 2nd ed 2006, Oxford University Press.
22. Ossenblok P., Spekreijse H. The extrastriate generators of the EP to checkerboard onset: a source localization approach. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991, 80:181-193.
23. Schroeder C.E., Tenke C.E., Givre S.J., Arezzo J.C., Vaughan H.G. Striate cortical contribution to the surface-recorded pattern-reversal VEP in the alert monkey. Vision Res 1991, 31:1143-1157.
24. Schwartz M., Shagass C. Recovery functions of human somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. Ann NY Acad Sci 1964, 112:510-525.
25. Seiple W., Holopigian K., Clemens C., Greenstein V.C., Hood D.C. The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields. Vision Res 2005, 45:1155-1163.
26. Sutter E.E. Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 2001, 41:1241-1255.
27. Tootell R.B.H., Hadjikhani N.K., Mendola J.D., Marrett S., Dale A.M. From retinotopy to recognition: fMRI in human visual cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 1998, 2:174-183.