Pattern of integration of conflicting stimuli by the crab heterozius rotundifrons

Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-19

  Hazlett, Brian A ^a   Mclay, Colin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Conflicting stimuli; Crab; Gradual increase; Heterozius rotundifrons; Integration

Indexed keywords

AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; CHEMICAL CUE; CRAB; INTERTIDAL ENVIRONMENT; LIMB; LOCOMOTION; POSTURE; PREDATION RISK; VISUAL CUE;

ANIMALIA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); HETEROZIUS ROTUNDIFRONS;

EID: 78751623835     PISSN: 10236244     EISSN: 10290362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10236244.2010.533519     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bouwma P, Hazlett BA. 2001. Integration of multiple predator cues by the crayfish Orconectes propinquus. Anim Behav. 61:771-776.
2. Brown GE, Adrian Jr JC, Patton T, Chivers DP. 2001. Fathead minnows learn to recognize predator odour when exposed to concentrations of artificial alarm pheromone below their behavioural-response threshold. Canad J Zool. 79:2239-2245.
3. Fentress JC. 1976. Dynamic boundaries of patterned behaviour: interaction and selforganization. In: Bateson PPB, Hinde RA, editors. Growing points in ethology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. p. 135-169.
4. Field LH. 1990. Aberrant defense displays of the big-handed crab, Heterozius rotundifrons (Brachyura: Belliidae). New Zealand J Marine and Freshw Res. 24:211-220.
5. Hazlett BA. 1996. Organisation of hermit crab behaviour: responses to multiple chemical inputs. Behaviour. 133:619-642.
6. Hazlett BA. 1997. The organization of behavior in hermit crabs: responses to variation in stimulus strength. Behaviour. 134:59-70.
7. Hazlett BA. 1999. Responses to multiple chemical cues by the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Behaviour. 136:161-177.
8. Hazlett BA. 2000. Responses to single and multiple sources of chemical cues by New Zealand crustaceans. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 34:1-20.
9. Hazlett BA. 2003. The effects of starvation on crayfish responses to alarm odor. Ethology. 109:587-592.
10. Hazlett BA. 2004. Alternative tactics and responses to conflicting inputs in the Porcellanid crab Petrolisthes elongatus. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 37:173-177.
11. Hazlett BA, Bach CE. 2010. Individuality in the predator defense behaviour of the crab Heterozius rotundifrons. Behaviour. 147:587-597.
12. Hazlett BA, McLay C. 2000. Contingencies in the behavior of the crab Heterozius rotundifrons. Anim Behav. 59:965-974.
13. Hazlett BA, McLay C. 2005. Responses to predation risk: alternative strategies in the crab Heterozius rotundifrons. Anim Behav. 69:967-972.
14. Hazlett BA, Rittschof D. 2000. Predation-reproduction conflict resolution in the hermit crab Clibanarius vittatus. Ethology. 106:811-813.
15. Kats LB, Dill LM. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience. 5:361-394.
16. Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canad J Zool. 68:619-640.
17. Mirza RA, Chivers DP. 2003. Response of juvenile rainbow trout to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cue: response thresholds and survival during encounters with predators. Canad J Zool. 81:88-95.
18. Mitchell B, Hazlett BA. 1996. Predator avoidance strategies of the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Crustaceana. 69:400-412.
19. Werner EE, Anholt BR. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat. 142:242-271.
20. Wisenden BD. 2003. Chemically mediated strategies to counter predation. In: Collins SP, Marshall NJ, editors. Sensory processing in aquatic environments. NY: Springer. p. 236-250.