Open innovation policy through intermediaries: The industry incubator programme in Norway

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 75-85

  Clausena, Tommy ^a   Rasmussenb, Einar ^b  

^a NORDLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^b BodØ Graduate School of Business   (Norway)

Author keywords

Additionality; Entrepreneurship; Evaluation; Incubators; Innovation policy; Open innovation

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; MODELING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

NORWAY;

EID: 78751612082     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537109     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aldrich, H. 1999. Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arrow, K.J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity, ed. R. Nelson, 609-25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Buisseret, T.J., H.M. Cameron, and L. Georghiou. 1995. What difference does it make - additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10, nos. 4-6: 587-600.
4. Chesbrough, H. 2006a. New puzzles and new findings. In Open innovation. Researching a new paradigm, ed. H. Chesbrough,W. Vanhaverbeke and J.West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chesbrough, H. 2006b. Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open innovation.
6. Researching a new paradigm, ed. H. Chesbrough,W. Vanhaverbeke and J.West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Chesbrough, H.W.,W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West. 2006. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dodgson, M., D. Gann, and A. Salter. 2006. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R & D Management 36, no. 3: 333-46.
10. Hall, B.H. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18, no. 1: 35-51.
11. Klerkx, L., and C. Leeuwis. 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76, no. 6: 849-60.
12. McAdam, M., B. Galbraith, R. McAdam, and P. Humphreys. 2006. Business processes and networks in university incubators: A review and research agendas. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, no. 5: 451-72.
13. Nelson, R.R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67: 297-306.
14. Rasmussen, E. 2008. Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation 28: 506-17.
15. Rye, M. 2002. Evaluating the impact of public support on commercial research and development projects: Are verbal reports of additionality reliable? Evaluation 8, no. 2: 227-48.
16. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development. New Brunwick, NJ: Transaction Books.
17. Winch, G.M., and R. Courtney. 2007. The organization of innovation brokers:An international review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, no. 6: 747-63.