A simple topological filter in a eukaryotic transposon as a mechanism to suppress genome instability

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 317-327

  Bouuaert, Corentin Claeys ^a   Liu, Danxu ^a   Chalmers, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DNA TRANSPOSITION; EUKARYOTE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSPOSON;

CATALYSIS; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DNA, SUPERHELICAL; EUKARYOTA; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; TRANSPOSASES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; SYNAPSIS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78751563869     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01066-10     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Augé-Gouillou, C., B. Brillet, M. H. Hamelin, and Y. Bigot. 2005. Assembly of the mariner MosI synaptic complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:2861-2870.
2. Bermúdez, I., J. Garcia-Martinez, J. E. Pérez-Ortín, and J. Roca. 2010. A method for genome-wide analysis of DNA helical tension by means of psoralen-DNA photobinding. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:e182.
3. Bischerour, J., and R. Chalmers. 2009. Base flipping in Tn10 transposition: an active flip and capture mechanism. PLoS One 4:e6201.
4. Bischerour, J., and R. Chalmers. 2007. Base-flipping dynamics in a DNA hairpin processing reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:2584-2595. (Pubitemid 47073672)
5. Bischerour, J., C. Lu, D. B. Roth, and R. Chalmers. 2009. Base flipping in V(D)J recombination: insights into the mechanism of hairpin formation, the 12/23 rule, and the coordination of double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:5889-5899.
6. Chalmers, R. M., and N. Kleckner. 1996. IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations. EMBO J. 15:5112-5122.
7. Chalmers, R. M., and N. Kleckner. 1994. Tn10/IS10 transposase purification, activation, and in vitro reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 269:8029-8035.
8. Claeys Bouuaert, C., and R. Chalmers. 2010. Transposition of the human Hsmar1 transposon: rate-limiting steps and the importance of the flanking TA dinucleotide in second strand cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:190-202.
9. Claeys Bouuaert, C., and R. M. Chalmers. 2010. Gene therapy vectors: the prospects and potentials of the cut-and-paste transposons. Genetica 138:473-484.
10. Craig, N. L., R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Lambowitz. 2002. Mobile DNA II. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
11. Crénès, G., D. Ivo, J. Herisson, S. Dion, S. Renault, Y. Bigot, and A. Petit. 2009. The bacterial Tn9 chloramphenicol resistance gene: an attractive DNA segment for MosI mariner insertions. Mol. Genet. Genomics 281:315-328.
12. Davies, D. R., I. Y. Goryshin, W. S. Reznikoff, and I. Rayment. 2000. Three-dimensional structure of the Tn5 synaptic complex transposition intermediate. Science 289:77-85.
13. Dawson, A., and D. J. Finnegan. 2003. Excision of the Drosophila mariner transposon mos1. Comparison with bacterial transposition and v (d) j recombination. Mol. Cell 11:225-235.
14. English, J. J., K. Harrison, and J. D. G. Jones. 1995. Aberrant transpositions of maize double Ds-like elements usually involve Ds ends on sister chromatids. Plant Cell 7:1235-1247.
15. Hazelbaker, D., M. A. Azaro, and A. Landy. 2008. A biotin interference assay highlights two different asymmetric interaction profiles for lambda integrase arm-type binding sites in integrative versus excisive recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 283:12402-12414.
16. Kazazian, H. H., Jr. 2004. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303:1626-1632.
17. Levene, S. D., and D. M. Crothers. 1986. Ring closure probabilities for DNA fragments by Monte Carlo simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 189:61-72.
18. Lipkow, K., N. Buisine, and R. Chalmers. 2004. Promiscuous target interactions in the mariner transposon Himar1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:48569-48575.
19. Lipkow, K., N. Buisine, D. J. Lampe, and R. Chalmers. 2004. Early intermediates of mariner transposition: catalysis without synapsis of the transposon ends suggests a novel architecture of the synaptic complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8301-8311.
20. Liu, D., J. Bischerour, A. Siddique, N. Buisine, Y. Bigot, and R. Chalmers. 2007. The human SETMAR protein preserves most of the activities of the ancestral Hsmar1 transposase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:1125-1132.
21. Liu, D., P. Crellin, and R. Chalmers. 2005. Cyclic changes in the affinity of protein-DNA interactions drive the progression and regulate the outcome of the Tn10 transposition reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1982-1992. (Pubitemid 41748342)
22. Lohe, A. R., E. N. Moriyama, D. A. Lidholm, and D. L. Hartl. 1995. Horizontal transmission, vertical inactivation, and stochastic loss of mariner-like transposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:62-72.
23. Miskey, C., B. Papp, L. Mates, L. Sinzelle, H. Keller, Z. Izsvak, and Z. Ivics. 2007. The ancient mariner sails again: transposition of the human Hsmar1 element by a reconstructed transposase and activities of the SETMAR protein on transposon ends. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:4589-4600.
24. Sakai, J., R. M. Chalmers, and N. Kleckner. 1995. Identification and characterization of a pre-cleavage synaptic complex that is an early intermediate in Tn10 transposition. EMBO J. 14:4374-4383.
25. Singleton, C. K., and R. D. Wells. 1982. The facile generation of covalently closed, circular DNAs with defined negative superhelical densities. Anal. Biochem. 122:253-257.
26. Spengler, S. J., A. Stasiak, and N. R. Cozzarelli. 1985. The stereostructure of knots and catenanes produced by phage lambda integrative recombination: implications for mechanism and DNA structure. Cell 42:325-334.
27. Travers, A., and G. Muskhelishvili. 2007. A common topology for bacterial and eukaryotic transcription initiation? EMBO Rep. 8:147-151.
28. Valenti, A., G. Perugino, A. D'Amaro, A. Cacace, A. Napoli, M. Rossi, and M. Ciaramella. 2008. Dissection of reverse gyrase activities: insight into the evolution of a thermostable molecular machine. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:4587-4597.
29. Vologodskii, A., and N. R. Cozzarelli. 1996. Effect of supercoiling on the juxtaposition and relative orientation of DNA sites. Biophys. J. 70:2548-2556.
30. Vologodskii, A. V., and N. R. Cozzarelli. 1993. Monte Carlo analysis of the conformation of DNA catenanes. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1130-1140.