Assembly of the mariner Mos1 synaptic complex

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 2861-2870

  Augé Gouillou, Corinne ^a   Brillet, Benjamin ^a   Hamelin, Marie Hélène ^a   Bigot, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPROTEIN; PROTEIN MOS1; TRANSPOSASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CROSS LINKING; DNA BINDING; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; STOICHIOMETRY; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; DIMERIZATION; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSPOSASES;

EID: 15044344827     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2861-2870.2005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Augé-Gouillou, C., M. H. Hamelin, M. V. Demattei, G. Periquet, and Y. Bigot. 2001. The ITR binding domain of the Mariner Mos1 transposase. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265:58-65.
2. Bessereau, J. L., A. Wright, D. C. Williams, K. Schuske, M. W. Davis, and E. M. Jorgensen. 2001. Mobilization of a Drosophila transposon in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Nature 413:70-74.
3. Bhasin, A., I. Y. Goryshin, M. Steiniger-White, D. York, and W. S. Reznikoff. 2000. Characterization of a Tn5 pre-cleavage synaptic complex. J. Mol. Biol. 302:49-63.
4. Chandler, M., and J. Mahillon. 2002. Insertion sequences revisited, p. 305-366. In N. L. Craig et al. (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
5. Chodosh, L. A. 2000. UV cross-linking of proteins to nucleic acids, p. 12.5.1-12.5.6. In F. M. Ausubel et al. (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6. Cui, Z., A. M. Geurts, G. Liu, C. D. Kaufman, and P. B. Hackett. 2002. Structure-function analysis of the inverted terminal repeats of the Sleeping Beauty transposon. J. Mol. Biol. 318:1221-1235.
7. Darling, P. J., J. M. Holt, and G. K. Ackers. 2000. Coupled energetics of λ cro repressor self-assembly and site-specific DNA operator binding. II. Cooperative interactions of cro dimers. J. Mol. Biol. 302:625-638.
8. Davies, D. R., I. Y. Goryshin, W. S. Reznikoff, and I. Rayment. 2000. Three-dimensional structure of the Tn5 synaptic complex transposition intermediate. Science 289:77-85.
9. Dawson, A., and D. J. Finnegan. 2003. Excision of the Drosophila mariner transposon Mos1: comparison with bacterial transposition and V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell 11:225-235.
10. Fischer, S. E. J., E. Wienholds, and R. H. A. Plasterk. 2001. Regulated transposition of a fish transposon in the mouse germ line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6759-6764.
11. Gorbunova, V., and A. A. Levy. 1997. Circularized Ac/Ds transposons: formation, structure and fate. Genetics 145:1161-1169.
12. Haniford, D. B. 2002. Transposon Tn10, p. 457-483. In N. L. Craig et al. (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
13. Izsvak, Z., D. Khare, J. Behlke, U. Heinemann, R. H. Plasterk, and Z. Ivics. 2002. Involvement of a bifunctional, paired-like DNA-binding domain and a transpositional enhancer in Sleeping Beauty transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 277:34581-34588.
14. Izsyak, Z., E. E. Stüwe, D. Fiedler, A. Katzer, P. A. Jeggo, and Z. Ivics. 2004. Healing the wounds inflicted by Sleeping Beauty transposition by double-strand break repair in mammalian somatic cells. Mol. Cell 13:279-290.
15. Lampe, D. J., M. E. A. Churchill, and H. M. Robertson. 1996. A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. EMBO J. 15:5470-5479.
16. Lampe, D. J., T. E. Grant, and H. M. Robertson. 1998. Factors affecting transposition of the HimarI mariner transposon in vitro. Genetics 149:179-187.
17. Lefevre, K. R., and M. H. Cordes. 2003. Retroevolution of lambda Cro toward a stable monomer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:2345-2350.
18. Lipkow, K., N. Buisine, D. Lampe, and R. Chalmers. 2004. Early intermediates of mariner transposition: catalysis without synapsis of the transposon ends suggests a novel architecture of the synaptic complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8301-8311.
19. Mizuuchi, M., T. A. Baker, and K. Mizuuchi. 1992. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell 70:303-311.
20. Mundy, C. L., N. Patenge, A. G. W. Matthews, and M. A. Oettinger. 2002. Assembly of the RAG1/RAG2 synaptic complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:69-77.
21. Normand, C., G. Duval-Valentin, L. Haren, and M. Chandler. 2001. The terminal inverted repeats of IS911: requirements for synaptic complex assembly and activity. J. Mol. Biol. 308:853-871.
22. Plasterk, R. H. A., and H. G. A. M. Van Luenen. 2002. The Tc1/mariner family of transposable elements, p. 519-532. In N. L. Craig et al. (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
23. Radice, A. D., and S. W. Emmons. 1993. Extra chromosomal circular copies of the transposon Tc1. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:2663-2667.
24. Reményi, A., A. Tomilin, E. Pohl, K. Lins, A. Philippsen, R. Reinhold, H. R. Schöler, and M. Wilmanns. 2001. Differential dimer activities of the transcription factor Oct-1 by DNA induced interface swapping. Mol. Cell 8:569-580.
25. Reznikoff, W. S. 2002. Tn5 transposition, p. 403-422. in N. L. Craig et al. (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
26. Rhee, J. M., C. A. Gruber, M. Trieu, and E. E. Turner. 1998. Highly cooperative homodimerization is a conserved property of neural POU proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 273:34169-34205.
27. Robertson, H. M. 1995. The Tc1-mariner superfamily of transposons in animals. J. Insect Physiol. 41:99-105.
28. Sakai, J., R. M. Chalmers, and N. Kleckner. 1995. Identification and characterization of a pre-cleavage synaptic complex that is an early intermediate in Tn10 transposition. EMBO J. 14:4374-4383.
29. Tosi, L. R. O., and S. M. Beverley. 2000. cis and trans factors affecting Mos1 mariner evolution and transposition in vitro, and its potential for functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:784-790.
30. Vos, J. C., and R. H. Plasterk. 1994. Tc1 transposase of Caenorhabditis elegans is an endonuclease with a bipartite DNA binding domain. EMBO J. 13:6125-6132.
31. Zhang, L., A. Dawson, and D. J. Finnegan. 2001. DNA binding activity and subunit interactions of the mariner transposase. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:3566-3575.