An integrated model of designing

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Srinivasan, V ^a   Chakrabarti, Amaresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN MODELS; INTEGRATED MODELS; SUPPORTING DESIGN;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

DESIGN;

EID: 78751482768     PISSN: 15309827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.3467011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Blessing, L., and Chakrabarti, A., 2009, DRM, A Design Research Methodology, Springer, London, UK.
2. Blessing, L., and Chakrabarti, A., 2002, "DRM: A Design Research Methodology," Proceedings of the International Conference on the Science of Design-The Scientific Challenge for the 21st Century, INSA, France.
3. Chakrabarti, A., Murdoch, T., and Wallace, K., 1995, "Towards a Glossary of Engineering Design Terms," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design(ICED95), Prague, Czech Republic.
4. Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer-Verlag, UK.
5. French, M., 1999, Conceptual Design for Engineers, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
6. Berliner, C., and Brimson, J., 1988, Cost Management for Today's Advanced Manufacturing: The CAM-I Conceptual Design, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
7. Zeiler, W., Savanovic, P., and Quanjel, E., 2007, "Design Decision Support for the Conceptual Phase of the Design Process," Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research-IASDR07-, Hong Kong.
8. Blessing, L., 1994, "A Process-Based Approach to Computer-Supported Engineering Design," PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
9. Simon, H., 1996, Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed., MIT, USA.
10. Smithers, T., 1992, "Design as Exploration: Puzzle-Making and Puzzle- Solving," Proceedings of the Workshop on Search-Based and Exploration- Based Models of the Design Process, Associated With AI in Design, J. Gero, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-22.
11. Cooper, R., 1991, "New Products: What Distinguishes the Winners?," Res. Technol. Manag., 33(6), pp. 27-31.
12. Stauffer, L., and Ullman, D., 1991, "Fundamental Processes of Mechanical Designers Based on Empirical Data," J. Eng. Design, 2(2), pp. 113-125.
13. 13 Nidamarthi, S., Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T., 1997, "The Significance of Co-Evolving Requirements and Solutions in the Design Process," Proceedings of the International Conference in Engineering Design(ICED97), Tampere, Finland, pp. 227-230.
14. Nidamarthi, S., 1999, "Understanding and Supporting Requirement Satisfaction in the Design Process," PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
15. Gero, J. S., 1990, "Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design," AI Mag., 11(4), pp. 26-36.
16. Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B. S., 2005, "A Functional Representation for Aiding Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas," AI EDAM, 19(2), pp. 113-132.
17. Zavbi, R., and Duhovnik, J., 2000, "Conceptual Design of Technical Systems Using Functions and Physical Laws," AI EDAM, 14(1), pp. 69-83.
18. Koyama, T., Taura, T., and Kawaguchi, T., 1996, "Research on Natural Law Database," Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Knowledge Based Software Engineering, Bulgaria.
19. Zavbi, R., and Duhovnik, J., 2001, "Analysis of Conceptual Design Chains for the Unknown Input/Known Output Pattern," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design(ICED01) , UK.
20. Murakoshi, S., and Taura, T., 1998, "Research on the Systematization of Natural Laws for Design Support," Proceedings of the IFIP Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD, Japan, pp. 141-160.
21. Chakrabarti, A., Johnson, A., and Kiriyama, T., 1997, "An Approach to Automated Synthesis of Solution Principles for Microsensor Designs," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design( ICED97), Finland.
22. Chakrabarti, A., Morgenstern, S., and Knaab, H., 2004, "Identification and Application of Requirements and Their Impact on the Design Process: A Protocol Study," Res. Eng. Des., 15(1), pp. 22-39.
23. Chakrabarti, A., 1994, "Requirements Identification: A Central Issue in Design Research," Proceedings of the International East-West Conference on IT in Design, Russia, pp. 108-117.
24. Cross, N., 2000, Engineering Design Methods-Strategies for Product Design, Wiley, UK, p. 42.
25. Chakrabarti, A., 2003, "Towards a Measure for Assessing Creative Influences of a Creativity Technique," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design(ICED03), Sweden.
26. Miller, G., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K., 1960, Plans and the Structure of Behaviour, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, USA.
27. Bhatta, S., and Goel, A., 2002, Design Patterns and Creative Design, Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Springer-Verlag, UK, pp. 271-284.
28. Hansen, C., and Andreasen, M., 2002, Two Approaches to Synthesis Based on the Domain Theory, Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Springer-Verlag, UK, pp. 93-108.
29. Lossack, R., 2002, Design Processes and the Context for the Support of Design Synthesis, Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Springer-Verlag, UK, pp. 213-227.
30. Cross, N., 2000, Engineering Design Methods-Strategies for Product Design, Wiley, UK, pp. 3-11.
31. Visser, W., 1991, "Evocation and Elaboration of Solutions: Different Types of Problem Solving Actions," Proceedings of the Third COGNITIVA Symposium on at the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Neuroscience, Madrid, Spain, pp. 161-168.
32. Cross, N., 2000, Engineering Design Methods-Strategies for Product Design, Wiley, UK, pp. 38-41.
33. Cambridge University Press, 2009, Cambridge Dictionaries Online, New York, http://www.dictionary.cambridge.org/
34. Hubka, V., and Eder, W., 2002, Theory of Technical Systems and Engineering Design Synthesis, Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Springer-Verlag, UK, pp. 49-65.
35. Campbell, M., and Rai, R., 2003, "A Generalization of Computational Synthesis Methods in Engineering Design," AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
36. Smithers, T., 1998, "Towards a Knowledge Level Theory of Design Process," AI in Design, J. Gero and F. Sudweeks, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 3-21.
37. Reich, Y., 1995, "A Critical Review of General Design Theory," Res. Eng. Des., 7(1), pp. 1-18.
38. Hubka, V., 1967, "Fundamental Algorithm for the Solution of Design Problems," Proceedings of the International Scientific Colloquium of the Technical University Ilmenau, Germany, pp. 69-74.
39. Rihtar šic, J., Žavbi, R., and Duhovnik, J., 2008, "Physical Nature of Technical Systems," Proceedings of the International Design Conference(DESIGN2008), Croatia, pp. 53-60.
40. Tomiyama, T., Kiriyama, T., Takeda, H., and Xue, D., 1989, "Metamodel: A key to Intelligent CAD Systems," Res. Eng. Des., 1(1), pp. 19-34.
41. Umeda, Y., Ishii, M., Yoshioka, M., Shimomura, Y., and Tomiyama, T., 1996, "Supporting Conceptual Design Based on the Function-Behaviour-State Modeler," AI EDAM, 10(4), pp. 275-288.
42. Nidamarthi, S., Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T., 2001, "Improving Requirement Satisfaction Ability of the Designer," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design(ICED01), Glasgow, UK, pp. 237-244.
43. Maher, M., Poon, J., and Boulanger, S., 1996, Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution: A Combined Gene Approach, Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD, J. Gero and F. Sudweeks, eds., Chapman and Hall, UK.
44. Sarkar, P., and Chakrabarti, A., 2007, "Understanding Search in Design," Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design(ICED07), France.
45. Chakrabarti, A., and Taura, T., 2006, "Computational Support of Synthesis and Analysis of Behaviour of Artefacts Using Physical Effects: Some Challenges," Proceedings of the International Design Conference(DESIGN2006) , Croatia.
46. Sternberg, R., and Lubart, T., 1999, The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms, Handbook of Creativity, R. Sternberg, ed., Cambridge University Press, UK.
47. Shah, J., Smith, S., and Vargas-Hernandez, N., 2003, "Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness," Des. Stud., 24(2), pp. 111-134.
48. Lopez-Mesa, B., and Vidal, R., 2006, "Novelty Metrics in Engineering Design Experiments," Proceedings of the International Design Conference(DESIGN2006), Croatia.
49. Westwood, A., and Sekine, Y., 1988, "Fostering Creativity and Innovation in an Industrial R and D Laboratory," Res. Technol. Manag., 31(4), pp. 16-20.
50. Ottosson, S., 1995, "Boosting Creativity in Technical Development," Proceedings of the Workshop in Engineering Design and Creativity, W. Eder, ed., Pilsen, Czech Republic, pp. 35-39.
51. Zimmerman, L., and Hart, G., 1998, Value Engineering-A Practical Approach for Owners, Designers and Contractors, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
52. Srinivasan, V., and Chakrabarti, A., 2010, "Novelty-Outcome Relationships in Engineering Design," AI EDAM, 24(2), pp. 161-178.
53. Cavallucci, D., 2002, TRIZ, the Altshullerian Approach to Solving Innovation Problems, Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 131-149.
54. Srinivasan, V., and Chakrabarti, A., 2009, Designing Novel Artifacts: A Novel Systematic Framework, Research Into Design: Supporting Multiple Facets of Product Development, A. Chakrabarti, ed., Research Publishing Services, Singapore.