How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: A process map

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 260-265

  Elwyn, Glyn ^a   Kreuwel, Ilse ^b   Durand, Marie Anne ^a   Sivell, Stephanie ^a   Joseph Williams, Natalie ^a   Evans, Rhodri ^a   Edwards, Adrian ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision aids; Decision support interventions; Development of complex interventions

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WEB BASED DECISION SUPPORT INTERVENTION;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMPATHY; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 78651506834     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Elwyn G., Frosch D., Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implementation Sci 2009, 4(2009):75.
2. O'Connor A.M., Bennett C.L., Stacey D., Barry M., Col N.F., Eden K.B., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, CD001431.
3. Elwyn G., O'Connor A., Stacey D., Volk R., Edwards A., Coulter A., et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Brit Med J 2006, 333:417-421.
4. Elwyn G., O'Connor A.M., Bennett C., Newcombe R.G., Politi M., Durand M.A., et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One 2009, 4:4705.
5. Raats C.J., van Veenendaal H., Versluijs M.M., Burgers J.S. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:413-417.
6. O'Connor A., Tugwell P., Wells G.A., Elmslie T., Jolyy E., Hollingworth G., et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone replacement therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 2000, 33:267-279.
7. O'Connor A.M., Stacey D., Entwistle V., Llewellyn-Thomas H., Rovner D., Holmes-Rovner M., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
8. Durand M.A., Stiel M., Boivin J., Elwyn G. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Educ Couns 2008, [Epub ahead of print].
9. Elwyn G, Stiel M, Durand MA, Boivin J. Theory-based design of decision support interventions: towards real-world guidelines, under review.
10. Evans R, Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Newcombe RG, Wright P, Kinnersley P et al. Supporting informed decision making for PSA testing on the web: an online randomised controlled trial. J Med Internet Res, in press.
11. Durand MA, Wegwarth O, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis. Health Expect, in press.
12. Wright P., John C., Belt S. Designing an interactive decision explorer. Inform Des J+Doc Des 2003, 11:252-260.
13. Wilson T.D., Gilbert D.T. Affective forecasting. Knowing what to want. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005, 14:131-134.
14. Durand M-A, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Multiple stakeholder field-testing of amnioDex, a decision support intervention for amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns, under review.
15. Evans R., Elwyn G., Edwards A., Watson E., Austoker J., Grol R. Toward a model for field-testing patient decision-support technologies: a qualitative field-testing study. J Med Internet Res 2007, 9:pe21.
16. Feldman-Stewart D., Brennenstuhl S., McIssac K., Austoker J., Charvet A., Hewitson P., et al. A systematic review of information in decision aids. Health Expect 2007, 10:46-61.
17. Durand MA, Steil M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Information and decision support need of parents considering amniocentesis: a qualitative study of pregnant women and health professionals. Health Expect, in press.
18. Feldman-Stewart D., Brennenstuhl S., Brundage M.D., Siemens D.R. Overall information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients over a decade: highly variable and remarkably stable. Support Care Cancer 2008, 17:429-435.
19. Krug S. Don't make me think! A common sense approach to web usability 2006, New Riders, Berkeley, CA. 2 ed.
20. Durand MA, Boivin J, Elwyn G.A qualitative field-testing study of a decision support intervention for amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns, in press.
21. Frosch D.L., Bhatnagar V., Tally S., Hamori C.J., Kaplan R.M. Internet patient decision support: a randomized controlled trial comparing alternative approaches for men considering prostate cancer screening. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:363-369.