The 97.5th and 99.5th percentile of vertical cup disc ratio in the United States

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 86-92

  Swanson, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

97.5th percentile; 99.5th percentile; Glaucoma; self reported glaucoma; vertical cup disc ratio

Indexed keywords

97.5TH PERCENTILE; 99.5TH PERCENTILE; GLAUCOMA; SELF-REPORTED GLAUCOMA; VERTICAL CUP DISC RATIO;

ESTIMATION; HEALTH RISKS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; OPTIC DISK; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; FUNDUS OCULI; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION SURVEYS; OPTIC DISK; PREVALENCE; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 78651499921     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc3638     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:844-51.
2. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, Friedman DS, Kempen J, Taylor HR, Mitchell P. The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-85.
3. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, Leske MC, Mitchell P, Congdon N, Kempen J. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:532-8.
4. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br JOphthalmol 2002;86:238-42.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about-nhanes.htm. Accessed August 27, 2010.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. The Nation Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 - 2006: Vision. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes-05-06/viq-d. pdf. Accessed March 31, 2010.
7. Fundus Photography Reading Center. Available at: http://eyephoto.ophth. wisc.edu/. Accessed March 31, 2010.
8. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Ophthalmology Procedures Manual: September 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ nhanes/nhanes-05-06/OP.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2010.
9. Analytical Methods Annual Report. NIDCR/CDC Dental Oral, and Craniofacial Data Resource Center. Oral Health, U.S. 2002 Annual Report. Available at: http://drc.hhs.gov/report/tn-methods.htm. Accessed March 24, 2010.
10. Cioffi GA, Mansberger S, Spry P, Johnson C, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:195-9.
11. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P. Nonconventional perimetric methods in the detection of early glaucomatous functional damage. Eye (Lond) 2010;24:835-42.
12. Mowatt G, Burr JM, Cook JA, Siddiqui MA, Ramsay C, Fraser C, Azuara-Blanco A, Deeks JJ. Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5373-85.
13. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Barron Y, Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:188-97.
14. Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:658-65.
15. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M, Higginbotham EJ. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:328-33. (Pubitemid 30126078)
16. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.
17. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74.
18. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1819-26.
19. Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, Nguyen BB, Deneen J, Wilson MR, Azen SP. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1439-48. (Pubitemid 39030793)
20. Friedman DS, Jampel HD, Munoz B, West SK. The prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among blacks and whites 73 years and older: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Glaucoma Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124:1625-30.
21. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, Menage MJ. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1499-504.
22. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Jonas JB, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Determinants of optic disc characteristics in a general population: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1588-96.
23. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112:821-9.
24. Ong LS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG. Asymmetry in optic disc parameters: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:849-57. (Pubitemid 29153250)
25. Higginbotham EJ, Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Drake MV, Bennett GR, Wilson MR, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: topical medication delays or prevents primary open-angle glaucoma in African American individuals. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122: 813-20.
26. Beck RW, Messner DK, Musch DC, Martonyi CL, Lichter PR. Is there a racial difference in physiologic cup size? Ophthalmology 1985;92:873-6.
27. Chi T, Ritch R, Stickler D, Pitman B, Tsai C, Hsieh FY. Racial differences in optic nerve head parameters. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:836-9.
28. Varma R, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Hilton SC, Katz J, Spaeth GL, Sommer A. Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1068-76.
29. Spry PG, Hussin HM, Sparrow JM. Performance of the 24-2-5 frequency doubling technology screening test: a prospective case study. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1345-9.
30. Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, Arimura E, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:210-5.
31. Tafreshi A, Sample PA, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Lalezary M, Racette L. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:1234-40.
32. Quigley HA, Jampel HD. How are glaucoma patients identified? J Glaucoma 2003;12:451-5.
33. Ostermann J, Sloan FA, Herndon L, Lee PP. Racial differences in glaucoma care: the longitudinal pattern of care. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1693-8.