Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Krupa, Niranjana ^a   MA, Mohd A ^a   Zahedi, Edmond ^b   Ahmed, Shuhaila ^c   Hassan, Fauziah M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA MEDICAL CENTER   (Malaysia)

^d CYBERJAYA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CROSS-VALIDATION TESTS; DATA SETS; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; FEATURE EXTRACTION AND CLASSIFICATION; FETAL HEART RATE; FETAL SURVEILLANCE; GEOMETRIC MEAN; KAPPA VALUES; NEW APPROACHES; SAMPLING RATES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD DEVIATION; TRAINING SETS; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); FETAL MONITORING; MACHINE COMPONENTS; NEONATAL MONITORING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VALIDATION STUDY;

CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PREGNANCY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 78651482192     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-6     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Georgoulas G, Stylios CD, Groumpos PP. Feature extraction and classification of fetal heart rate using wavelet analysis and support vector machines. Int. J. AI Tools 2006, 15:411-432.
2. Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability: a noninvasive signature of cardiac autonomic function. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng 1993, 21(Suppl 3):245-311.
3. Signorini MG, Magenes G, Cerutti S, Arduini D. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2003, 50:365-374. 10.1109/TBME.2003.808824, 12669993.
4. Lecanuet JP, Schaal B. Fetal sensory competencies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol 1996, 68:1-23. 10.1016/0301-2115(96)02509-2, 8886675.
5. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet 1997, 57:33-37. 10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02846-4, 9175667.
6. Guijarro-Berdinas B, Alonso-Betanzos A, Fontenla-Romero O. Intelligent analysis and pattern recognition in cardiotocographic signals using a tightly coupled hybrid system. Artif. Intell 2002, 136:1-27.
7. Georgoulas G, Gavrilis D, Tsoulos IG, Stylios CD, Bernardes J, Groumpos PP. Novel approach for fetal heart rate classification introducing grammatical evolution. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 2007, 2:69-79.
8. Mantel R, Geijn HP, Caron FJ, Swartjes JM, Woerden EE, Jongsma HW. Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 1. Baseline determination. Int. J. Biomed. Comput 1990, 25:261-272. 10.1016/0020-7101(90)90030-X, 2194979.
9. Mantel R, Geijn HP, Caron FJ, Swartjes JM, Woerden EE, Jongsma HW. Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 2. Detection of accelerations and decelerations. Int. J. Biomed. Comput 1990, 25:273-286. 10.1016/0020-7101(90)90031-O, 2194980.
10. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Computerized analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 1995, 173:1353-1354. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91391-2, 7485356.
11. Taylor GM, Mires GJ, Abel EW, Tsantis S, Farrell T, Chien PFW, Liu Y. The development and validation of an algorithm for real time computerized fetal heart rate monitoring in labour. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 2000, 107:1130-1137.
12. Ulbricht C, Dorffner G, Lee A. Neural networks for recognizing patterns in cardiotocograms. Artif. Intell. Med 1998, 12:271-284. 10.1016/S0933-3657(97)00052-3, 9626959.
13. Fontenla-Romero O, Alonso-Betanzos A, Guijarro-Berdiñas B. Adaptive Pattern Recognition in the Analysis of Cardiotocographic Records. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2001, 12:1188-1195.
14. Bernardes J, Moura C, Sa JPM, Pereira-Leite L. The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis. J. Perinat. Med 1991, 19:61-65. 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.61, 1870058.
15. Bernardes J, Moura C, Sa JPM, Pereira-Leite L, Geijn HP. The Porto system. A Critical Appraisal of Fetal Surveillance 1994, 315-324. Elsevier Science New York, HP. van Geijn, FJA. Copray.
16. Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Garrido A, de Sa JPM, Pereira-Leite L. SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J. Matern. Fetal Med 2000, 9:311-318. 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<311::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-9, 11132590.
17. Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int. J. Gynecol. Obset 1987, 25:159-167.
18. Kol S, Thaler I, Paz N, Shmueli O. Interpretation of non-stress tests by an artificial neural network. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 1995, 172:1372-1379.
19. Chung TKH, Mohajer MP, Yang XJ, Chang AMZ, Sahota DS. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerized analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 1995, 102:454-460. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11317.x, 7632636.
20. Magenes G, Signorini MG, Arduini D. Classification of cardiotocographic records by neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE-INNSENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'00) volume 3: 24-27 July 2000 2000, 637-641. Como, Italy.
21. Magenes G, Signorini MG, Sassi R, Arduini. Multiparametric analysis of fetal heart rate: comparison of neural and statistical classifiers. IFMBE Proceedings Medicon 2001-IX Mediterranean Conference on Medical Engineering and Computing: Part I 2001, 360-363. Pula, Croatia.
22. Ifeachor EC, Keith RDF, Westgate J, Greene KR. An expert system to assist in the management of labour. Proceedings World Congress on Expert Systems volume 4: 16-19 December 1991; Orlando 1991, 2615-2622. Oxford Pergamon Press, Liebowitz.
23. Skinner JF, Garibaldi JM, Ifeachor EC. A fuzzy system for fetal heart rate assessment. Proceedings 6th Fuzzy Days on Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications: 25-28 May 1999 1999, 20-29. Dortmund, Germany.
24. Alonso-Betanzos A, Moret-Bonillo V, Devoe LD, Searle JR, Banias B, Ramos E. Computerized antenatal assessment: The NSTEXPERT project. Automedica 1992, 14:3-22.
25. Alonso-Betanzos A, Guijarro-Berdinas B, Moret-Bonillo V, Lopez-Gonzalez S. The NST-EXPERT project: the need to evolve. Artif. Intell. Med 1995, 7:297-313. 10.1016/0933-3657(95)00007-S, 7581626.
26. Salamalekis E, Thomopoulos P, Giannaris D, Salloum I, Vasios G, Prentza A, Koutsouris D. Computerised intrapartum diagnosis of fetal hypoxia based on fetal heart rate monitoring and fetal pulse oximetry recordings utilising wavelet analysis and neural networks. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 2002, 109:1137-1142.
27. Struzik ZR, Wijngaarden WJ. Cumulative effective Hölder exponent based indicator for real time fetal heart beat analysis during labour. CWI Report INS-R0110 2001, 1-13.
28. Georgoulas G, Chrysostomos Stylios D, Groumpos PP. Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2006, 53:875-884. 10.1109/TBME.2006.872814, 16686410.
29. Magenes G, Pedrinazzi L, Signorini MG. Identification of fetal sufferance antepartum through a multiparametric analysis and a support vector machine. Proc. Of the 26th Annual Int. Conf of the IEEE EMBS: 1-5 September 2004 2004, 462-465. San Francisco, USA.
30. Lunghi F, Magenes G, Pedrinazzi L, Signorini MG. Detection of fetal distress through a support vector machine based on fetal heart rate parameters. Computers in Cardiology 2005, 32:247-250.
31. Warrick PA, Kearney RE, Precup D, Hamilton EF. System-Identification noise suppression for intra-partum cardiotocography to discriminate normal and hypoxic fetuses. Computers in Cardiology 2006, 33:937-940.
32. Ferrario M, Signorini MG, Magenes G. Complexity analysis of the fetal heart rate variability: early identification of severe intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput 2009, 47:911-919. 10.1007/s11517-009-0502-8, 2734261, 19526262.
33. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen N-C, Tung CC, Liu HH. The empirical mode decomposition and hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A volume 454: 8 March 1998, 903-995. (1998).
34. Liang H, Lin Z, McCallum RW. Artifact reduction in electrogastrogram based on the empirical model decomposition method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput 2000, 38:35-41. 10.1007/BF02344686, 10829388.
35. Liang H, Lin Q-H, Chen JDZ. Application of the empirical mode decomposition to the analysis of esophageal manometric data in gastroesophageal reflux disease. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2005, 52:1692-1701. 10.1109/TBME.2005.855719, 16235655.
36. Blanco-Velasco M, Weng B, Barner KE. ECG signal denoising and baseline wander correction based on the empirical mode decomposition. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2008, 38:1-13. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.06.003, 17669389.
37. Salisbury JI, Sun Y. Assessment of chaotic parameters in nonstationary electrocardiograms by use of empirical mode decomposition. Ann. Biomed. Eng 2004, 32:1348-1354. 10.1114/B:ABME.0000042223.87320.de, 15535053.
38. Echevarría JC, Crowe JA, Woolfson MS, Hayes-Gill BR. Application of empirical mode decomposition to heart rate variability analysis. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput 2001, 39:471-479.
39. Ortiz MR, Bojorges ER, Aguilar SD, Echeverria JC, Gonzalez-Camarena R, Carrasco S, Gaitan MJ, Martinez A. Analysis of high frequency fetal heart rate variability using empirical mode decomposition. Computers in Cardiology 2005, 32:675-678.
40. Krupa BN, Mohd Ali MA, Zahedi E. Application of empirical mode decomposition for the enhancement of cardiotocograph signals. Physiol. Meas 2009, 30:729-743. 10.1088/0967-3334/30/8/001, 19550027.
41. Vapnik VN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995, New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 1998, 2:121-167.
43. Muller KR, Mika S, Ratsch G, Tsuda K, Scholkopf B. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw 2001, 2:181-201.
44. Veropoulos K, Cristianini N, Campbell C. The application of support vector machines to medical decision support: a case study. Advanced Course in Artificial Intelligence 1999, 1-6. (ACAI'99).
45. Duin RPW. Classifiers in almost empty spaces. International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'00) volume 2: 3-8 September 2000 2000, 1-7. Barcelona, Spain, Proc. 15th.
46. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation 1999, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2.
47. Osuna E, Freund R, Grosi F. Support Vector Machines: Training and applications. MIT A. I Lab., A. I. Memo AIM - 1602 1997, 1-42.
48. Georgoulas G, Chrysostomos Stylios D, Groumpos PP. Classification of fetal heart rate using scale dependent features and support vector machines. Proc of 16 thIFAC World Cong.: 4-8 July 2005 2005, Prague.
49. Kampouraki A, Manis G, Nikou C. Heartbeat time series classification with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2009, 13:512-518.
50. Alonso-Betanzos A, Mosqueira-Rey E, Moret-Bonillo V, Baldonedo del R. Applying statistical, uncertainty-based and connectionist approaches to the prediction of fetal outcome: a comparative study. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Elsevier Science 1999, 17:37-57.
51. Kubat M, Matwin S. Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Sets: One-Sided Selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning: 8-12 July 1997 1997, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
52. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960, 20:37-46.
53. Thuner S, Feurstein MC, Teich MC. Multiresolution wavelet analysis of heartbeat intervals discriminates healthy patients from those with cardiac pathology. Physical Review Letters 1998, 80:1544-1547.
54. Guijarro-Berdinas B, Alonso-Betanzos A. Empirical evaluation of a hybrid intelligent monitoring system using different measures of effectiveness. Artif. Intell. In Medicine, Elsevier 2002, 24:71-96.