Comparative study of Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr cesarean techniques: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 239-244

  Naki, Mehmet Murat ^a   Api, Oluş ^a   Çelik, Hasniye ^a   Kars, Bülent ^a   Yaşar, Esra ^a   Ünal, Orhan ^a  

^a Dr Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Research and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

cesarean technique; Misgav Ladach; operation time; Pfannenstiel Kerr; primary cesarean section

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS OUTCOME; FEVER; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINAL DYSMOTILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MISGAV LADACH METHOD; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PFANNENSTIEL KERR METHOD; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEROMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; SUTURING METHOD; TRAUMATIC HEMATOMA; UTERINE ATONY; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651437424     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.482612     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23: CD004662. Review. (Pubitemid 351807701)
2. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57:273-279. (Pubitemid 27252564)
3. Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:615-621. (Pubitemid 29322472)
4. Xavier P, Ayres-De-Campos D, Reynolds A, Guimaraes M, Costa Santos C, Patricio B. The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:878-882. (Pubitemid 41215807)
5. Kulas T, Habek D, Karsa M, Bobic-Vukovic M. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;65:222-226. (Pubitemid 351793719)
6. Ayres-de-Campos D, Patricio B. Modifications to the Misgav Ladach technique for cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:326-327.
7. Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR. Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:273-276.
8. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis R. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1108-1111.
9. Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgkins P, Owen J, Winkler CL. Trial of labor after one-or two-layer closure of a low trans verse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:545-546. (Pubitemid 23069109)
10. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Miglierina M, Agosti M, et al. Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:1040-1046.
11. Stark M, Finkel AR. Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;53:121-122. (Pubitemid 24080917)
12. Darj E, Nordström M-L. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:37-41. (Pubitemid 29043910)
13. Mathai M, Ambersheth S, George A. Comparison of two transverse abdominal incisions for cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;78:47-49. (Pubitemid 34756770)
14. Björklund K, Kimaro M, Urassa E, Lindmark G. Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2000;107:209-216. (Pubitemid 30081586)
15. Ferrari AG, Frigerio L, Candotti G, Origoni M, Mariani A, Petrone M. Modified Stark procedure for cesarean section. First Italian experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;3:95-102. (Pubitemid 27487374)
16. Grundsell HS, Rizk DEE, Kumar RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:110-115.
17. Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, et al. Closure or non-closure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 1366-1370. (Pubitemid 26131162)
18. Fatusić Z, Kurjak A, Jasarević E, Hafner T. The Misgav Ladach method - a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics. J Perinat Med 2003;31:395-398. (Pubitemid 37309901)
19. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Balestreri D, Beretta P, Maymon E, et al. A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1998;15:589-94. (Pubitemid 29048786)
20. Wallin G, Fall O.Modified Joel-Cohen technique for cesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:221-226. (Pubitemid 29118907)
21. Varga P, Bodis J. Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years experience. Letter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:90-92. (Pubitemid 32055556)
22. Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:842-855. (Pubitemid 24354385)
23. Del Valle GO, Coombs P, Qualls C, Curet LB. Does closure of Camper fascia reduce the incidence of postcesarean superficial wound disruption? Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:1013-1016. (Pubitemid 23005850)
24. Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owens J, Hodgkins PM, Lincoln T. Aproximation of the subcutaneous tissue lowers the incidence of wound complications after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:341.