Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: Clinical experience

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 222-226

  Kulaš, Tomislav ^b   Habek, Dubrav ^a,c   Karša, Matija ^b   Bobić Vuković, Mirna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OSIJEK   (Croatia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Maternal outcome, cesarean section; Misgav Ladach method, modifications

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIPYRETIC AGENT;

ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEVER; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; PARITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEROMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44849100498     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000113044     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stark M: Technique of Caesarean section: the Misgav Ladach method; in Popkin DR, Peddle LJ (eds): Women's Health Today: Perspectives on Current Research and Clinical Practice. Proc. 14th World Congress Gynecol Obstet, Montreal. New York, Parthenon, 1994, pp 81-85.
2. Joel-Cohen S: Abdominal and Vaginal Hysterectomy. New Techniques Based on Time and Motion Studies. London, Heinemann Medical Books, 1972, p 170.
3. Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M: The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:615-621.
4. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M: Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57:273-279.
5. Dörffler H: Über den Kaiserschnitt zur aseptischen Geburt. Munich, Lehmann, 1929.
6. Kulaš T, Habek D, Erman Vlahović M, Bečarević R, Popović Z, Rosso M, Kalajžić T, Lovrić A, Bobić Vuković M, Vujić B, Jakobović M, Ugljarević M, Vojnović R, Selthofer R: 153 Misgav Ladach versus conventional caesarean section: initial clinical experience. 21st Congress of Croatian Perinatal Medicine. Gynaecol Perinatol 2004;13(suppl 2):169.
7. Nather A, Zeisler H, Sam CE, Husslein P, Joura EA: Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections (in German). Wien Klin Wochenschr 2001;113:451-453.
8. Lurie S, Feinstein M, Mamet Y: Assessment of a newer technique for cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002;266:195-197.
9. Darj E, Nordström ML: The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:37-41.
10. Jeselma RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ: Continuous, non-locking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. J Reprod Med 1993;38:393-396.
11. Tucker MJ, Hant JC, Hodgkins P, Owens J, Winkler CL: Trial of labor after a one- or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:545-546.
12. Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR: Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:273-276.
13. Stark M: Adhesion-free cesarean section. World J Surg 1993;17:419.
14. Tulandi T, Hum HS, Gelfand MM: Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second-look laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:536-537.
15. Larsen B, Davis B, Charles D: Critical assessment of antibacterial properties of human amniotic fluid. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1984;18:100-104.
16. Scholz HS, Petru E, Tamussino K, Winter R: Wound rupture after Misgav-Ladach cesarean section: a case report (in German). Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2004;44:238-239.
17. Stark M, Finkel AR: Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;53:121-122.
18. Fatusić Z, Kurjak A, Jašarević E, Hafner T: The Misgav Ladach method - a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics. J Perinat Med 2003;31:395-398.
19. Joura EA, Yücel Y, Zeisler H, Seifert M, Chalubinski K, Husslein P: Minimal wound closure at caesarean delivery. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 1998;58:651-653.
20. Redlich A, Köppe I: The 'gentle caesarean section' - an alternative to the classical way of sectio. A prospective comparison between the classical technique and the method of Misgav Ladach (in German). Zentralbl Gynakol 2001;123:638-643.
21. Heidenreich W, Borgmann U: Results of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section (in German). Zentralb Gynakol 2001;123:634-637.
22. Studzinski Z: The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel technique (in Polish). Ginekol Pol 2002;73:672-676.
23. Moreira P, Morau JC, Faye ME, Ka S, Kane Gueye SM, Faye EO, Dieng T, Diadhiou F: Comparison of two cesarean techniques: classic versus Misgav Ladach cesarean (in French). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2002;31:572-576.