Pulse oximetry saturation to fraction inspired oxygen ratio as a measure of hypoxia under general anesthesia and the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 542.e9-542.e13

  Tripathi, Ravi S ^a   Blum, James M ^a   Rosenberg, Andrew L ^a   Tremper, Kevin K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

ALI; ARDS; P to F ratio; S to F ratio

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL GAS; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HYPOXIA; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INSPIRATORY CAPACITY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OXYGEN SATURATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULSE OXIMETRY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 78651435631     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Vincent J.L., Moreno R., Takala J., et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22:707-710.
2. Bernard G.R., Artigas A., Brigham K.L., et al. The American-European Consensus conference on ARDS: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Consensus Committee. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149:818-824.
3. Tobin M.J., Jubran A. Reliability of pulse oximetry in titrating supplemental oxygen therapy in ventilator-dependent patients. Chest 1990, 97:1420-1425.
4. 2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007, 132:410-417.
5. 2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in children. Chest 2009, 135:662-668.
6. 2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:1317-1321.
7. Jensen L.A., Onyskiw J.E., Prasad N.G. Meta-analysis of arterial oxygen saturation monitoring by pulse oximetry in adults. Heart Lung 1998, 27:387-408.
8. Amato M.B., Barbas C.S., Medeiros D.M., et al. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998, 338:347-354.
9. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1301-1308.
10. Kalhan R., Mikkelsen M., Dedhiya P., et al. Underuse of lung protective ventilation: analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:300-306.
11. Rubenfeld G.D., Cooper C., Carter G., et al. Barriers to providing lung-protective ventilation to patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:1289-1293.
12. Fernandez-Perez E.R., Sprung J., Afessa B., et al. Intraoperative ventilator settings and acute lung injury after elective surgery: a nested case control study. Thorax 2009, 64:121-127.
13. Rubenfeld G.D., Caldwell E., Peabody E., et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1685-1693.
14. Schultz M.J., Haitsma J.J., Slutsky A.S., et al. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury?. Anesthesiology 2007, 106:1226-1231.