Wh-questions: Moving beyond the first phase

Lingua

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 352-366

  de Villiers, Jill G ^a   de Villiers, Peter A ^a   Roeper, Thomas ^b  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

African American English; Feature checking; Long distance wh movement; SLI; Wh questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651373151     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abdulkarim, L., 2001. Complex Wh-questions and Universal Grammars: New Evidence from the Acquisition of Negative Barriers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2. Chomsky N. On wh-movement. Formal Syntax 1977, 71-132. Academic Press, New York. P.W. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (Eds.).
3. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Chomsky, N., 2005. On Phases. Unpublished paper, MIT. Online available, http://www.punksinscience.org/kleanthes/courses/MATERIALS/Chomsky_Phases.pdf.
5. Dayal V. Scope marking: cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. Wh-Scope Marking 2000, 157-195. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. U. Lutz, G. Müller, A. von Stechow (Eds.).
6. de Villiers J.G. Extension, intension and other minds. Research in Child Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language 2001, 1015-1025. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. M. Almgren (Ed.).
7. de Villiers J.G. Getting complements on your mental state (verbs). Proceedings of the 2003 GALA Conference 2004, 13-26. LOT, Utrecht. J. Kampen, van, S. Baauw (Eds.).
8. de Villiers J.G. Can language acquisition give children a point of view?. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind 2005, 186-220. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Astington, J. Baird (Eds.).
9. de Villiers J.G. The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua 2007, 117:1858-1878.
10. de Villiers J.G., Pyers J. Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief understanding. Cognitive Development 2002, 17:1037-1060.
11. de Villiers J.G., Roeper T. Questions after stories: supplying context and removing it as a variable. Methodology in Child Language Research 1996, 163-188. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. D. McDaniel, H. Cairns, C. McKee (Eds.).
12. de Villiers J.G., Roeper T., Vainikka A. The acquisition of long-distance rules. Language Processing and Language Acquisition 1990, 257-297. Kluwer, Dordrecht. L. Frazier, J.G. de Villiers (Eds.).
13. de Villiers J.G., et al. Answering hard questions: wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics 2008, 29:67-103.
14. de Villiers P.A. Assessing pragmatic skills in elicited production. Seminars in Speech and Language 2004, 25:57-72.
15. Égré P. Question-embedding and factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 2005, 77:85-125.
16. Fanselow G. Partial wh-movement. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 2005, vol. III:437-493. Blackwell, Oxford.
17. Green L. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 1982, 5:175-233.
19. Guerzoni E., Sharvit Y. A question of strength: on NPIs in interrogative clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 2007, 30:361-391.
20. Hagstrom P. What questions mean. Glot International 2003, 7:188-201.
21. Herburger, E., 1994. A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Conference, Boston, MA.
22. Hollebrandse B. On the relation between the acquisition of sequence of tense and theory of mind. BUCLD 22: Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Child Development 1999, 374-384. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. A. Greenhill, A. et (Eds.).
23. Hollebrandse B. A special case of wh-extraction in child language. Lingua 2007, 117:1897-1906.
24. Hollebrandse, B., Roeper T., 1998. Point of view operators, features and a theory of barriers. University of Pennsylvania Linguistics Colloquium, 1st March.
25. Johnson, V., et al., 2005. Speech act responses: a closer look. Poster presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
26. Karttunen L. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1977, 1:3-44.
27. Kiparsky P., Kiparsky C. Fact. Progress in Linguistics 1970, 143-173. Mouton, The Hague. M. Bierwisch, K. Heidolph (Eds.).
28. Koster, J., 2003. All languages are tense second. Unpublished paper, University of Groningen.
29. Kyuchukov, H., Roeper, T., de Villiers, J.G., 2007. Wh-questions in bilingual Romani-Bulgarian children. Paper presented at COST Action 33 Conference in Cyprus, October 25-27.
30. Lahiri U. On the proper treatment of 'expletive wh' in Hindi. Lingua 2002, 112:501-540.
31. Lahiri U. Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. McDaniel D. Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1989, 7:565-604.
33. McDaniel D., Chiu B., Maxfield T. Parameters for wh-movement types: evidence from child language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1995, 13:709-753.
34. Oiry, M., Demirdache, H., 2006. Evidence from L1 acquisition for the syntax of wh-scope marking in French. Unpublished paper, University of Nantes.
35. Perez-Leroux A.T., Schulz P. Role of tense and aspect in the acquisition of factivity: children's interpretations of factive complements in English, German and Spanish. First Language 1999, 55:29-54.
36. Rizzi L. On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects. Wh-movement: Moving On 2006, 97-133. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L. Cheng, N. Corver (Eds.).
37. Roeper T. The Prism of Grammar: How Child Language Illuminates Humanism 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Roeper T., de Villiers J.G. Lexical links in the wh-chain. Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, vol. II: Binding, Dependencies and Learnability 1994, 357-390. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. B. Lust, G. Hermon, J. Kornfilt (Eds.).
39. Schulz, B., 2004. A Minimalist account of partial wh-movement. Unpublished paper, University of Hawaii.
40. Seymour H.N., Roeper T., de Villiers J.G. Dialect Sensitive Language Test: Tryout Edition 2000, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
41. Seymour H.N., Roeper T., de Villiers J.G. Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation: Screening Test (DELV-ST) 2003, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
42. Seymour H.N., Roeper T., de Villiers J.G. Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation: Norm Referenced (DELV-NR) 2005, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
43. Sharvit Y. Embedded questions and 'de dicto' readings. Natural Language Semantics 2002, 10:97-123.
44. Speas P. Person and point of view in Navajo. WCCFL Papers in Honor of Ken Hale 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. E. Jelinek (Ed.).
45. Speas P., Tenny C. Configurational properties of point of view roles. Asymmetry in Grammar, vol. I: Syntax and Semantics 2003, 315-343. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. A. DiSciullo (Ed.).
46. Thornton, R., 1991. Adventures in Long Distance Moving: The Acquisition of Wh-questions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.