Probabilistic vulnerability scenarios for horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges under earthquake loads

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2202, 2010, Pages 206-211

  Seo, Junwon ^a   Linzell, Daniel G ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGES; CURVED-BRIDGE; DAMAGE STATE; EARTHQUAKE LOAD; FRAGILITY CURVES; MONTE CARLO'S SIMULATION; PROBABILISTICS; RESPONSE SURFACE METAMODEL; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; SEISMIC ZONES;

STEEL BRIDGES;

EID: 78651344047     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2202-24     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abdel-Salam, M. N. Seismic Response of Curved Steel Box Girder Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 12, 1988, pp. 2790-2800.
2. Al-Baijat, H. M. O. Behavior of Horizontally Curved Bridges Under Static Load and Dynamic Load from Earthquakes. PhD dissertation. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, 1999.
3. Hosoda, N., I. Ksneko, and K. Kuroda. Seismic Response of Curved Continuous Menshin Bridge. Proc., 1st U.S. - Japan Workshop on Earthquake Protective Systems for Bridges, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Project 90-6016, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1992.
4. Wu, H., and W. S. Najjar. Parametric Seismic Analysis of Curved Steel Box-Girder Bridges with Two Continuous Spans. Proc., New York City Bridge Conference, New York, 2007.
5. HAZUS-MHMR1: Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2003.
6. Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, X. Dong, T. Uzawa, and T. Ueda. Damage Assessment of a Highway Network Under Scenario Earthquakes for Emergency Response Decision Support. Proc., SPIE, Vol. 3988, Newport Beach, Calif., 2000.
7. Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson. Seismic Fragility of Typical Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones. Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, 2004, pp. 187-199.
8. Murachi, Y., M. J. Orikowski, X. Dong, and M. Shinozuka. Fragility Analysis of Transportation Networks. Proc., SPIE, Vol. 5057, San Diego, Calif., 2003.
9. DesRoches, R., E. Choi, R. T. Leon, and T. Pfeifer. Seismic Response of Multiple Span Steel Bridges in Central and Southeastern United States. I: As Built. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2004.
10. Dueñas-Osorio, L., J. I. Craig, and B. J. Goodno. Rapid Regional Response Simulation of 3-D Prototype Structures for Fragility Characterization. Presented at 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2004.
11. Franchin, P., A. Lupoi, P. E. Pinto, and M. I. J. Schotanus. Response Surface for Seismic Fragility Analysis of RC Structures. Proc., 9th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability, San Francisco, Calif., 2003.
12. U.S. Geological Survey, National Seismic Hazard Maps. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2002/maps/. Accessed Aug. 10, 2008.
13. Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees), Version 1.7.3. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2008.
14. Rix, G. J., and J. A. Fernandez-Leon. Synthetic Ground Motions for Memphis, Tenn. http://www.ce.gatech.edu/research/maegroundmotion. Accessed July 5, 2008.
15. Nielson, B. G. Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones. PhD dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2005.
16. SAS Institute Inc. JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide, Version 5.1.2. Cary, N.C., 2008.
17. Seo, J. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Family of Horizontally Curved Steel Bridges Using Response Surface Metamodels. PhD dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 2009.