Phase-space characterization of complexity in quantum many-body dynamics

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Balachandran, Vinitha ^a   Benenti, Giuliano ^b,c   Casati, Giulio ^b,c,d   Gong, Jiangbin ^a,e  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI MILANO   (Italy)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL SYSTEMS; DYNAMICAL COMPLEXITY; ENTROPY MEASURE; ISING CHAINS; MANY-BODY; MANY-BODY SYSTEMS; MIXED STATE; MULTIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENTS; NUMERICAL EVIDENCE; PHASE SPACES; QUANTUM CHAOS; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS; SINGLE-PARTICLE; TILTED MAGNETIC FIELDS; WIGNER FUNCTIONS;

ENTROPY; HARMONIC FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; PHASE SPACE METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 78651328413     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.046216     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J. Ford, Phys. Today 36 (4), 40 (1983) 10.1063/1.2915570
2. V. M. Alekseev and M. V. Yakobson, Phys. Rep. 75, 290 (1981). 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90186-1
3. J. B. Gong and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. A 68, 062103 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062103
4. A. K. Pattanayak and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5174 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5174
5. V. V. Sokolov, O. V. Zhirov, G. Benenti, and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. E 78, 046212 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046212
6. G. Benenti and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. E 79, 025201 (R) (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.025201
7. R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Quantum Dynamical Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001) 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198504009.001.0001
8. T. Prosen, J. Phys. A 40, 7881 (2007) 10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S02
9. F. Benatti, Dynamics, Information and Complexity in Quantum Systems (Springer, New York, 2009) (and references therein).
10. T. Prosen and M. Znidarič, Phys. Rev. E 75, 015202 (R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.015202
11. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2005), P04010 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/04/P04010
12. G. De Chiara, S. Montangero, P. Calabrese, and R. Fazio, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2006), P03001. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P03001
13. V. Bargmann, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 14, 187 (1961) 10.1002/cpa. 3160140303
14. R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963) 10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766
15. G. S. Agarwal and E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2161 (1970) 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2161
16. G. S. Agarwal and E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2187 (1970). 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2187
17. Note however, the second moment of the Fourier harmonics and the entropy measure S (t) are not equivalent. For instance, in systems like the classical Arnold cat map, it turns out that the number of the Fourier harmonics is preserved in time, but the second moment increases; see, for example, T. Prosen, e-print arXiv:1008.2419.
18. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 91, 728 (1953). 10.1103/PhysRev.91.728
19. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
20. A. Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994).
21. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961). 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4
22. P. Facchi, G. Florio, and S. Pascazio, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042331 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042331
23. D. A. Meyer and N. R. Wallach, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4273 (2002). 10.1063/1.1497700
24. G. K. Brennen, Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 619 (2003).
25. T. R. de Oliveira, G. Rigolin, and M. C. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. A 73, 010305 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.010305
26. A. Sugita, J. Phys. A 36, 9081 (2003). 10.1088/0305-4470/36/34/310
27. S. Schenk and G.-L. Ingold, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022328 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022328
28. K. Furuya, M. C. Nemes, and G. Q. Pellegrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5524 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5524
29. P. A. Miller and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1542 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1542
30. A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. E 64, 036207 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevE.64. 036207
31. A. Tanaka, H. Fujisaki, and T. Miyadera, Phys. Rev. E 66, 045201 (2002) 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.045201
32. J. B. Gong and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022101 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022101
33. S. Ghose, P. M. Alsing, B. C. Sanders, and I. H. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 72, 014102 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.014102
34. S. Åberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3119 (1990) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64. 3119
35. J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991) 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046
36. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994) 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888
37. V. V. Flambaum and F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5144 (1997) 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5144
38. Ph. Jacquod and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1837 (1997) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1837
39. G. Benenti, G. Casati, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Eur. Phys. J. D 17, 265 (2001) 10.1007/s100530170031
40. C. Kollath, A. M. Läuchli, and E. Altman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180601 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.180601
41. S. R. Manmana, S. Wessel, R. M. Noack, and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210405 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.210405
42. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008). 10.1038/nature06838