Design of a participatory decision making agent architecture based on argumentation and influence function - Application to a serious game about biodiversity conservation

RAIRO - Operations Research

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 269-283

  Sordoni, Alessandro ^a   Briot, Jean Pierre ^a,b   Alvarez, Isabelle ^c   Vasconcelos, Eurico ^b   De Azevedo Irving, Marta ^d   Melo, Gustavo ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c Cemagref   (France)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Architecture; Argumentation; Artificial agent; Collective; Decision; Management of the environment; Negotiation; Participatory; Serious game

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS;

ARGUMENTATION; ARTIFICIAL AGENTS; COLLECTIVE; DECISION; NEGOTIATION; PARTICIPATORY;

SERIOUS GAMES;

EID: 78651325789     PISSN: 03990559     EISSN: 28047303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/ro/2010024     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D.F. Adamatti, J.S. Sichman and H. Coelho, Virtual players: From manual to semiautonomous RPG, in Proc. of AIS-CMS'07 International Modeling and Simulation Multiconference (IMSM'07), Buenos Aires, Argentina, edited by F. Barros, C. Frydman, N. Giambiasi and B. Ziegler. The Society for Modeling Simulation International (SCS) (2007) pp. 159-164.
2. L. Amgoud and S. Kaci, On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation, in Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, 3366, Springer (2005) 192-207.
3. J.-P. Aubin, Viability theory, Modern Birkhäuser Classics (1992).
4. O. Barreteau, The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: Characterization of associations. J. Artif. Societies Social Simulation 6 (2003).
5. R.H. Bordini, M. Wooldridge and J.F. Hübner, Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason, Wiley Series in Agent Technology, John Wiley & Sons (2007).
6. G. Choquet, Theory of capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5 (1953) 131-295.
7. P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77 (1995) 321-357.
8. P. Guyot and S. Honiden, Agent-based participatory simulations: Merging multi-agent systems and role-playing games. J. Artif. Societies Social Simulation 9 (2006).
9. P. Moraitis, Un mod̀ele de raisonnement pour agents autonomes fond́e sur l'argumentation, in Jourńees Nationales de Mod̀eles de Raisonnement (JNMR'03), Paris, France (2003).
10. I. Rahwan and L. Amgoud, An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning, in Proc. of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'06), Hakodate, Japan, ACM (2006) pp. 347-354.
11. A. Sordoni, Conception et implantation d'un agent artificiel dans le cadre du projet Sim- Parc, Master's thesis, EDITE, Universit́e Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Paris, France (2008).
12. E. Vasconcelos, J.-P. Briot, M. Irving, S. Barbosa and V. Furtado, A user interface to support dialogue and negotiation in participatory simulations, edited by N. David and J.S. Sichman, in Multi-Agent-Based Simulation IX, LNAI, 5269, Springer (2009) 127-140.
13. E. Vasconcelos, G. Melo, J.-P. Briot, V.S. Patto, A. Sordoni, M. Irving, I. Alvarez and C. Lucena, A serious game for exploring and training in participatory management of national parks for biodiversity conservation: Design and experience, in Proc. of the VIIIth Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGAMES'09), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2009), pp.53-60.