A vector space analysis of swedish patent claims with different linguistic indices

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 47-56

  Andersson, Linda ^a,b  

^a Information Retrieval Facility   (Austria)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Decompounding; Information retrieval; Lemmatization; Natural language processing; Patent retrieval

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC RETRIEVAL; DECOMPOUNDING; LEMMATIZATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATENT CLAIMS; PATENT RETRIEVAL; RETRIEVAL MODELS; VECTOR SPACE ANALYSIS; VECTOR SPACE MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; VECTOR SPACES; VECTORS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78651325647     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1871888.1871898     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Hedlund, T. A., Pirkola, A. and Järvelin, K. 2001. Aspects of Swedish morphology and semantics from the perspective of mono- and cross-language information retrieval Information Processing and Management - Volume 37(1), 147-161.
2. Karlgren, J. 2005 Occurrence of compound terms and their constituent elements in Swedish, In the 15th Nordic Conference on Computational linguistics, (Joensuu, Findland).
3. Järborg, J. 1998 Sammansättningssemantik, Technical Report. Department of Swedish, Göteborg University.
4. Atkinson, K. H. 2008. Toward a more rational patent search paradigm. In Proceeding of the 1st ACM Workshop on Patent information Retrieval (Napa Valley, California, USA, October 30 - 30, 2008). PaIR '08. ACM, New York, NY, 37-40. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458572.1458582
5. Lopresti, D. 2008. Optical character recognition errors and their effects on natural language processing. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on Analytics For Noisy Unstructured Text Data (Singapore, July 24 - 24, 2008)
6. Dura, E. 1998 Parsing Words Doctoral Thesis, Department of Swedish section of Computational Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
7. Iwayama, M., Fujii, A., Kando, N., and Marukawa, Y. 2003. An empirical study on retrieval models for different document genres: patents and newspaper articles. In Proc. of the 26th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in informaion Retrieval (Toronto, Canada, July 28 - August 01, 2003). SIGIR '03. ACM, New York, NY, 251-258. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/860435.860482
8. Fujii, A., Iwayama, M. and Kando, N. 2007 Introduction to the special issue on patent processing Information Processing and Management - Volume 43, 1149-1153.
9. Roda, G., Zenz, V., Lupu, M., Järvelin, K., Sanderson, M., and Womser-Hacker, C. 2009. So many topics, so little time. SIGIR Forum 43, 1 (Jun. 2009), 9-16. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1670598.1670601
10. Malmgren, S.-G. 1994 Svensk lexikologi - ord, ordbildning, ordböcker och orddatabaser Studentlitteratur, Lund
11. Teleman, U., Hellberg, S., Andersson, E. and Christensen, L. 1999 Svenska Akademiens grammatik [The grammar of the Swedish Academy], (4 volumes) Svenska Akademien, NorstedsOrdbok, Stockholm
12. Karlgren, J, Sahlgren, M. and Cöster, R. 2004 Selective compound splitting of Swedish queries for Boolean combinations of truncation terms, In the 4th Workshop of Cross language Evaluation Forum CLEF 2003, (Trondheim, Norway.)
13. Sjöbergh, J. and Kann, V. (2004) Finding the Correct Interpretation of Swedish Compound a Statistical Approach, In Proc. of the 4th International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation LREC-2004, (pp. 899-902), (Lisbon, Portugal)
14. Ejerhed, E., Källgren, G., Wennstedt, O. and Åström, M. 1992 The linguistic annotation system of the Stockholm-Umeå corpus project Technical Report Department of General Linguistics, Stockholm University
15. Dalianis, H. 2005 Improving search engine retrieval using a compound splitter for Swedish, In the 15th Nordic Conference on Computational linguistics, (Joensuu, Findland)
16. Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. H. 2000 Speech and Language Processing Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey
17. Schäuble, P. 1997 Multimedia information retrieval: content-based information retrieval from large text and audio databases Kluwer, Boston, Mass
18. Buckley, C. and Voorhees, E. M. 2000. Evaluating evaluation measure stability. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, July 24 - 28, 2000). SIGIR '00. ACM, New York, NY, 33-40. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 345508.345543
19. Ahlgren, P. 2004 The Effects of Indexing Strategy-Query Term Combination on Retrieval Effectiveness in a Swedish Full Text Doctoral Thesis, University, Department of Library and Information Studies, University of Gothenburg.
20. Karlsson, F. 1992, SWETWOL: A Comprehensive Morphological Analyser for Swedish Nordic Journal of Linguistic - Volume 15, 1-45
21. Koskenniemi, K. 1983 TWO-LEVEL MORPHOLOGY: A General Computation Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production Doctoral Thesis, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki
22. Volk, M., (1999), Choosing the right lemma when analysing German nouns In Multilinguale Corpora: Codierung, Strukturierung, Analyse 11. Jahrestagung der GLDV, (Frankfurt, Germany)
23. Tapanainen, P. 1999 Parsing in two frameworks: finite-state and functional dependency grammar Doctoral Thesis, University of Helsinki
24. Voutilainen, A. (2001), Parsing Swedish, In Proc. of the 13th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics Nodalida-01, (Uppsala, Sweden.)
25. Svenska Författningssamlingen 1967 Patentlagen § 82, SFS, 1967:837
26. Larkey, L. S. 1999. A patent search and classification system. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (Berkeley, California, United States, August 11 - 14, 1999). DL '99. ACM, New York, NY, 179-187. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/313238.313304
27. Sheremetyeva, S. 2003 Natural language analysis of patent claims In Proc. of the ACL-03 Work-shop on Patent Corpus Processing, (pp. 66-73), (Sapporo, Japan.)
28. Krier, M. and Zaccà, F. (2002), Automatic categorisation applications at the European patent office World Patent Information - Volume 24(3), pp. 187-196
29. Fall, C. J., Törcsvári, A., Benzineb, K., and Karetka, G. 2003. Automated categorization in the international patent classification. SIGIR Forum 37, 1 (Apr. 2003), 10-25. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/945546.945547
30. Hull D., Ait-Mokhtar S., Chuat M., Eisele A., Gaussier E., Grefenstette C., Isabelle P., Samuelsson C., Segond F., (2001) Language technologies and patent search and classification, World Patent Information, Volume 23(3), pp. 265-268,
31. Rice V. S. 1996. Measuring the Accuracy of Page-Reading System. Doctoral Thesis. University of Nevada, SPIE-IS&T/ Vol. 7534 75340O-8.