Transfer of innovative policies between cities to promote sustainability: Case study evidence

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2163, 2010, Pages 89-96

  Marsden, Greg ^a   Frick, Karen Trapenberg ^b   May, Anthony D ^a   Deakin, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-STUDIES; COMPACT GROWTH; CONGESTION CHARGING; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; POLICY LEARNING; POLICY TRANSFER; POLITICAL SCIENCE; PROJECT REPORTS; TRANSFER LEARNING; TRANSPORT POLICY;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

EID: 78651317077     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2163-10     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Levi-Faur, D., and E. Vigoda-Gadot. New Public Policy, New Policy Transfers: Some Characteristics of a New Order in the Making. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 247-262.
2. Berry, F. S. Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, 1997, p. 322.
3. Kern, K., C. Koll, and M. Schophaus. The Diffusion of Local Agenda 21 in Germany: Comparing the German Federal States. Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, pp. 604-624.
4. Heichel, S., J. Pape, and T. Sommerer. Is There Convergence in Convergence Research? An Overview of Empirical Studies on Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2005, pp. 817-840.
5. Marsden, G., K. T. Frick, A. D. May, and E. Deakin. Good Practice in the Exploitation of Innovative Strategies in Sustainable Urban Transport: City Interview Synthesis. University of Leeds/Volvo Research and Educational Foundation, 2009. www.its.leeds.ac.uk.
6. Marsden, G. Good Practice in the Exploitation of Innovative Strategies in Sustainable Urban Transport: A Review of Evidence. University of Leeds/Volvo Research and Educational Foundation, 2008. www.its. leeds.ac.uk.
7. Vickrey, W. Pricing in Urban and Suburban Transport. American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1963, pp. 452-465.
8. May, A. D., and D. S. Milne. The Impact on Network Performance of Drivers' Response to Alternative Road Pricing Schemes. In Road Pricing: Theory. Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 61-85.
9. Central London Congestion Charging: Impacts Monitoring-6th Annual Report. Transport for London, 2008.
10. Eliasson, J., A. Hultkrantz, L. Nerhagen, and L. S. Rosqvist. The Stockholm Congestion-Charging Trial 2006: Overview of Effects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2009, pp. 240-250.
11. Gaunt, M., T. Rye, and S. Ison. Gaining Public Support for Congestion Charging: Lessons from Referendum in Edinburgh, Scotland. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1960, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 87-93.
12. C-Charge: A Resounding NO. Manchester Evening News, Dec. 12, 2008. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1085031-ccharge-a- resounding-no. Accessed July 10, 2009.
13. Sylvan, H. Green Urban Mobility: Transport Plans for the Copenhagen Capital Region. City of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
14. Cervero, R., S. Murphy, C. Ferrell, N. Goguts, Y.-H. Tsai, G. B. Arrington, J. Boroski, J. Smith-Heimer, R. Golem, P. Peninger, E. Nakajima, E. Chui, R. Dunphy, M. Myers, and S. McKay. TCRP Report 102: Transit- Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
15. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. HUD, DOT, and EPA Partnership: Sustainable Communities, June 16, 2009. http://www.hud.gov/content/ releases/pr2009-06-16factsheet.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2009.
16. Wolman, H., and E. Page. Policy Transfer Among Local Governments: An Information-Theory Approach. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 477-501.
17. MacDonald, E. Street Facing Dwelling Units and Livability: The Impacts of Emerging Building Types in Vancouver's New High- Density Residential Neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 10, No. 1, Feb. 2005, pp. 13-38.
18. Transportation Plan Update: A Decade of Progress. City of Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Oct. 24, 2007.
19. Bridging the Gap: Annual Report 2008. Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash.
20. Shaheen, S. A., A. P. Cohen, and J. D. Roberts. Car Sharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
21. Shaheen, S. A., and A. P. Cohen. Growth in Worldwide Car-Sharing: An International Comparison. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 81-89.
22. Myers, D., and S. Cairns. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2008-09. TRL Published Project Report 399. U.K. Transport Research Laboratory, 2009. http://www.carplus.org.uk/.
23. Millard-Ball, A., G. Murray, J. Ter Schure, C. Fox, and J. Burkhardt. TCRP Report 108: Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
24. Albury, D. Fostering Innovation in Public Services. Public Money and Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 51-56.
25. Hartley, J. Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2005, pp. 27-34.
26. Engeström, Y. Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001, pp. 133-156.
27. Sauquet, A. Learning in Organisations: Schools of Thought and Current Challenges. In Dynamics of Organizational Change and Learning (J. J. Boonstra, ed.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom, 2004, pp. 371-388.
28. Salskov-Iverson, D. Learning Across Borders: The Case of Danish Local Government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, 2006, pp. 673-686.
29. Rose, R. Learning from Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide. Routledge, Oxon, United Kingdom, 2005.