Experimental validation of the influence of white matter anisotropy on the intracranial EEG forward solution

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 371-387

  Bangera, Nitin B ^a,b   Schomer, Donald L ^c   Dehghani, Nima ^b   Ulbert, Istvan ^d   Cash, Sydney ^e   Papavasiliou, Steve ^c   Eisenberg, Solomon R ^a   Dale, Anders M ^b   Halgren, Eric ^b  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

FEM; Finite element model; Forward solution; Intracranial EEG; Source localization; Validation; White matter anisotropy

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TENSORS;

ANISOTROPIC MODELS; EIGEN-VALUE; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING (FEM); FORWARD SOLUTION; INTRACRANIAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ISOTROPIC MODELS; MODEL-BASED OPC; SOURCE LOCALIZATION; VALIDATION; WHITE MATTER ANISOTROPY;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ACCURACY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BRAIN VENTRICLE; CASE REPORT; CEREBELLUM; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CORONA RADIATA (BRAIN); CORPUS CALLOSUM; CRANIAL SINUS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIPOLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; GRAY MATTER; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MODEL; MUSCLE TISSUE; OPTIC CHIASM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SKULL; SPINAL CORD; SUBCORTEX; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; TOOTH; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 78651308641     PISSN: 09295313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-009-0205-z     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akhtari, M., Bryant, H. C., Mamelak, A. N., Flynn, E. R., Heller, L., Shih, J. J., et al. (2002). Conductivities of three layer live human skull. Brain Topography, 13(3), 151-167.
2. Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J., & LeBihan, D. (1994). MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophysical Journal, 66, 259-267.
3. Baumann, S. B., Wozny, D. R., Kelly, S. K., & Meno, F. M. (1997). The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng., 44(3), 220-223.
4. Bédard, C., Kröger, H., & Destexhe, A. (2004). Modeling Extracellular Field Potentials and the Frequency-Filtering Properties of Extracellular Space. Biophysical Journal, 86(3), 1829-1842.
5. Burger, H. C., & Van Milaan, J. B. (1943). Measurement of the specific resistance of the human body to direct current. Acta. Med. Scand., 114, 584-607.
6. Butson, C. R., Cooper, S. E., Henderson, J. M., & McIntyre, C. C. (2006). Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage, 34(2), 661-670.
7. Cohen, D., Cuffin, B. N., Yunokuchi, K., Maiewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G. R., et al. (1990). MEG versus EEG Localization Test Using Implanted Sources in the Human Brain. Ann. Neurol., 28, 811-817.
8. Cuffin, B. N. (1998). EEG dipole source localization. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology: 118-122.
9. Cuffin, B. N., Cohen, D., Yunokuchi, K., Maiewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G. R., et al. (1991). Tests of EEG Localization Accuracy Using Implanted Sources in the Human Brain. Ann. Neurol., 29, 132-138.
10. Cuffin, B. N., Schomer, D. L., Ives, J. R., & Blume, H. (2001). Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(1), 46-51. (Pubitemid 32008736)
11. Gabriel, S., Lau, R. W., & Gabriel, C. (1996). The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys. Med. Biol., 41, 2271-2293.
12. Geddes, L. A., & Baker, L. E. (1967). The specific resistance of biological materials: A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med. Biol. Eng., 5(3), 271-293.
13. Haueisen, J., Tuch, D. S., Ramon, C., Schimpf, P. H., Wedeen, V. J., George, J. S., et al. (2002). The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG. NeuroImage, 15, 159-166.
14. Henderson, C. J., Butler, S. R., & Glass, A. (1975). The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 39, 117-130.
15. Latikka, J., Kuurne, T., & Eskola, H. (2001). Conductivity of living intracranial tissues. Phys. Med. Biol., 46, 1611-1616.
16. Law, S. K. (1993). Thickness and resistivity variations over the upper surface of the human skull. Brain Topography, 6(2), 99-109.
17. Leahy, R., Mosher, J. C., Spencer, M. E., Huang, M. X., & Lewine, J. D. (1998). A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 107(2), 159-173. (Pubitemid 28396647)
18. Lindenblatt, G., & Silny, J. (2001). A model of the electrical volume conductor in the region of the eye in the ELF range. Phys. Med. Biol., 46, 3051-3059.
19. Malte Zöckler, D. S., Hans-Christian Hege (1996). Interactive visualization of 3D-vector fields using illuminated stream lines. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Visualization, IEEE Visualization 107-113.
20. McCreery, D. B., Agnew, W. F., Yuen, T. G. H., & Bullara, L. (1990). Charge Density and Charge Per Phase as Cofactors in Neural Injury Induced by Electrical Stimulation. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng., 37(10), 996-1001.
21. Meijs, J. W. H., Weier, O., Peters, M. J., & Van Oosterom, A. (1989). On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng., 36, 1038-1049.
22. Merill, D. R., Bikson, M., & Jeffreys, J. G. R. (2005). Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 141, 171-198.
23. Nicholson, P. W. (1965). Specific impedance of cerebral white matter. Exp. Neurol. (13):386-401.
24. Okada, Y. C., Huang, J.-C., Rice, M. E., Tranchina, D., & Nicholson, C. (1994). Origin of the apparent tissue conductivity in the molecular and granular layers of the in vitro turtle cerebellum and the interpretation of Current Source-Density analysis. J. Neurophysiol., 72, 742-753.
25. Oostendorp, T. F., Delbeke, J., & Stegeman, D. F. (2000). The Conductivity of the Human Skull: Results of In Vivo and In Vitro Measurements. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng., 47(11), 1487-1492.
26. Plummer, C., Litewka, L., Farish, S., Harvey, A. S., & Cook, M. J. (2007). Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.08.016. (Pubitemid 47554544)
27. Ranck, J. B., & Be Meritt, S. L. (1965). The specific impedance of the dorsal columns of cat; an anisotropic medium. Exp. Neurol., 11, 451-463.
28. Salu, Y., Cohen, L. G., Rose, D., Sato, S., Kufta, C., & Hallett, M. (1990). An improved method for localizing electric brain dipoles. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng., 37(7), 699-704.
29. Smith, D. B., Sidman, R. D., Henke, J. S., Flanigin, H., Labiner, D., & Evans, C. N. (1983). Scalp and Depth recordings of induced deep cerebral potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 55, 145-150.
30. Smith, D. B., Sidman, R. D., Flanigin, H., Henke, J., & Labiner, D. A. (1985). Reliable method for localising deep intracranial sources in the EEG. Neurology, 35, 1702-1707.
31. Tehovnik, E. J. (1996). Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 65, 1-17.
32. Tuch, D. S., Wedeen, V. J., Dale, A. M., George, J. S., & Belliveau, J. W. (2001). Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI. PNAS, 98(20), 11697-11701.
33. Ulbert, I., Halgren, E., Heit, G., & Karmos, G. (2001). Multiple multielectrode recording system for human intracortical applications. J. NeuroScience Methods, 106, 69-79.
34. Visage Imaging, Inc. (2007). AMIRA - Advanced 3D Visualization and Volume Modeling. Carlsbad, CA.
35. Wolters, C. H. (2003). Influence of Tissue Conductivity Inhomogeneity and Anisotropy on EEG/MEG based Source Localization in the Human Brain, PhD Thesis. Mathematics, University of Leipzig. PhD: 253.
36. Wolters, C. H., Anwander, A., Tricoche, X., Weinstein, D., Koch, M. A., & MacLeod, R. S. (2006). Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: A simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Neuroimage, 30(3), 813-826.