Tunable helical ribbons

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Chen, Z ^a,b   Majidi, C ^c   Srolovitz, D J ^d   Haataja, M ^a,b,e  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b Harvard University ^*  (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING   (Singapore)

^e PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED FORM; DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY; ELASTIC MISMATCH; ENGINEERED SYSTEMS; HELICAL RIBBONS; HELICITIES; HELIX ANGLES; RESIDUAL STRAINS; SHAPE PREDICTION; SURFACE STRESS; TABLE-TOP; THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES;

LAMINATED COMPOSITES; STEREOCHEMISTRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 78651280782     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3530441     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D. S. Chung, G. B. Benedek, F. M. Konikoff, and J. M. Donovan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 0027-8424 90, 11341 (1993). 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11341
2. R. L. B. Selinger, J. V. Selinger, A. P. Malanoski, and J. M. Schnur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 93, 158103 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.158103
3. X. Y. Kong and Z. L. Wang, Nano Lett. 1530-6984 3, 1625 (2003). 10.1021/nl034463p
4. L. Zhang, E. Deckhardt, A. Weber, C. Schönenberger, and D. Grützmacher, Nanotechnology 0957-4484 16, 655 (2005). 10.1088/0957-4484/16/ 6/006
5. A. Cho, Science 0036-8075 313, 164 (2006). 10.1126/science.313.5784.164
6. S. Srivastava, A. Santos, K. Critchley, K. -S. Kim, P. Podsiadlo, K. Sun, J. Lee, C. Xu, G. D. Lilly, S. C. Glotzer, and N. A. Kotov, Science 0036-8075 327, 1355 (2010). 10.1126/science.1177218
7. N. Chouaieb, A. Goriely, and J. H. Maddocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 0027-8424 103, 9398 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0508370103
8. G. G. Stoney, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 0950-1207 82, 172 (1909). 10.1098/rspa.1909.0021
9. S. Timoshenko, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 0030-3941 11, 233 (1925). 10.1364/JOSA.11.000233
10. Z. Suo, E. Y. Ma, H. Gleskova, and S. Wagner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 74, 1177 (1999). 10.1063/1.123478
11. J. Zang, M. Huang, and F. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 98, 146102 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146102
12. Y. V. Zastavker, N. Asherie, A. Lomakin, J. Pande, J. M. Donovan, J. M. Schnur, and G. B. Benedek, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 0027-8424 96, 7883 (1999). 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7883
13. B. Smith, Y. V. Zastaver, and G. B. Benedek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 87, 278101 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.278101
14. G. Hwang, C. Dockendorf, D. Bell, L. Dong, H. Hashimoto, D. Poulikakos, and B. Nelson, Int. J. Optomechatronics 2, 88 (2008). 10.1080/15599610802081795
15. J. J. Abbott, K. E. Peyer, M. C. Lagomarsino, L. Zhang, L. Dong, I. K. Kaliakatsos, and B. J. Nelson, Int. J. Robot. Res. 0278-3649 28, 1434 (2009). 10.1177/0278364909341658
16. J. Wang, X. Feng, G. Wang, and S. Yu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 92, 191901 (2008). 10.1063/1.2928221
17. The latex sheets were produced by Small Parts Inc. and the elastic strips were acrylic, scotch wall-mounting tape, produced by 3M. Their Young's moduli are 1.4 and 10.3 MPa, respectively, measured by Instron 5848 micro-tester. The Poisson's ratio of acrylic is taken to be 0.37 from biomaterials database at University of Michigan and is 0.49 for latex sheets [from Comput. Struct. 0045-7949 81, 715 (2003)]. 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00481-9