The potential of web-based interventions for heart disease self-management: A mixed methods investigation

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Kerr, Cicely ^a   Murray, Elizabeth ^a   Noble, Lorraine ^a   Morris, Richard ^a   Bottomley, Christian ^b   Stevenson, Fiona ^a   Patterson, David ^c   Peacock, Richard ^d   Turner, Indra ^f   Jackson, Keith ^e   Nazareth, Irwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c WHITTINGTON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d Archway Healthcare Library   (United Kingdom)

^e British Cardiac Patient Association   (United Kingdom)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Coronary disease; Digital divide; Healthcare disparities; Heart diseases; Internet; Primary health care; Selective enrolment; Self care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COUNSELING; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CORONARY DISEASE; COUNSELING; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERNET; LONDON; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE;

EID: 78651272940     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1438     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Clark NM. Management of chronic disease by patients. Annual Review of Public Health 2003;24:289-313. [doi: 10.1146/annurev. publhealth.24.100901. 141021]
2. Department of Health. 2004. The NHS Improvement Plan: Putting people at the heart or public services URL: http://www.dh.gov. uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/ dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-4084522.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTqYnRl9]
3. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JA, American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2007;27(3):121-129. [doi: 10.1097/01. HCR.0000270696.01635.aa]
4. Lorig KR, Hurwicz ML, Sobel D, Hobbs M, Ritter PL. A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: a process evaluation study. Patient Educ Couns 2005 Oct; 59(1):69-79. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.10. 002] (Pubitemid 41399880)
5. Department of Health. 2004. The Expert Patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century URL: http://www.dh.gov. uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/ dh-4018578.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTqjLdgN]
6. Bethell HJ, Evans JA, Turner SC, Lewin RJ. The rise and fall of cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom since 1998. J Public Health (Oxf) 2007 Mar; 29(1):57-6. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl091]
7. Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, et al. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust 2008 Nov. 17; 189 (10 Suppl): S21-S2. [FREE Full text]
8. Bury M, Newbold J, Taylor D. A rapid review of the current state of knowledge regarding lay led self-management of chronic illness. URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/lay-led-rapid-review-v10-FINAL.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTr3PMmt]
9. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2002 Aug; 16(5):541-552.
10. Foster G, Taylor SJ, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(4):CD005108. [doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD005108.pub2]
11. Baum FE, Bégin M, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems toward health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health 2009 Nov; 99(11):1967-1974. [doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154856]
12. Adshead F, Thorpe A. Health inequalities in England: advocacy, articulation and action. Perspect Public Health 2009 Jan; 129(1):37-41.
13. Fotheringham MJ, Owies D, Leslie E, Owen N. Interactive health communication in preventive medicine: internet-based strategies in teaching and research. Am J Prev Med 2000 Aug; 19(2):113-120.
14. Muñoz RF, Barrera AZ, Delucchi K, Penilla C, Torres LD, Pérez-Stable EJ. International Spanish/English Internet smoking cessation trial yields 20% abstinence rates at 1 year. Nicotine Tob Res 2009 Sep; 11(9):1025-103. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp090]
15. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(4):CD004274. [doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD004274.pub4]
16. Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I. Internet interventions for long-term conditions: patient and caregiver quality criteria. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(3):e1. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e13] (Pubitemid 44525434)
17. Internet Access 2009: Households and Individuals. National Statistics URL: http://www.statistics.gov. uk/pdfdir/iahi0809.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTrDleM1]
18. World Internet Project. USC Annenberg School for Communication. Highlights: The 2009 digital future project - year 8 URL: http://www. worldinternetproject.net/publishedarchive/2009-Digital-Future-Project-Release- Highlights.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTrPOP4b]
19. Dutton WH, Helsper EJ, Gerber MM. Oxford Internet Surveys (OxIS). The Internet in Britain 2009 URL: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/downloads/index.cfm?File= research/oxis/OxIS2009-Report.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTrZSXfi]
20. Fox S. Digital Divisions. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2005. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP- Digital-Divisions-Oct-5-2005.pdf.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTrknKrO]
21. Gilmour JA. Reducing disparities in the access and use of Internet health information. a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2007 Sep; 44(7):1270-1278. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.007]
22. Canadian Internet Project. World Internet Project. Canada Online! Year 2 Report 2007 URL: http://www.worldinternetproject.net/publishedarchive/CIP07- CANADA-ONLINE-REPORT-FINAL.pdf [accessed 2009-12-12] [WebCite Cache ID 5m5Xibo8P]
23. Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(1):e. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1035]
24. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2007. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/ media//Files/Reports/2007/EPatients-Chronic-Conditions-2007.pdf.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTs2t9bG]
25. Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 2006 Jan; 75(1):8-28. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032] (Pubitemid 43075559)
26. Wong BM, Yung BM, Wong A, Chow CM, Abramson BL. Increasing Internet use among cardiovascular patients: new opportunities for heart health promotion. Can J Cardiol 2005 Mar. 15; 21(4):349-35. [FREE Full text]
27. Atkinson NL, Gold RS. The promise and challenge of eHealth interventions. Am J Health Behav 2002;26(6):494-503.
28. Benigeri M, Pluye P. Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. Health Promot Int 2003 Dec; 18(4):381-38. [FREE Full text]
29. Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Boles S, McKay HG. Who participates in Internet-based self-management programs? A study among novice computer users in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ 2000;26(5):806-811.
30. McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Wise M, et al. CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. J Ambul Care Manage 1995 Jul; 18(3):35-41.
31. UK online centres: Transformational government for the citizen. DC10plus-The network for change, 2006 URL: http://www.dc10plus.net/resources/ documents/Transform-Gov-for-Citzen.pdf [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTsL8I2J]
32. Baker D. National database of deprivation sores by primary care practice: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester; 2006.
33. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A. Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. London: Croom Helm; 1988.
34. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Inform 2002 Nov. 12; 65(3):169-177.
35. Kerr C, Murray E, Burns J, Turner I, Westwood MA, MacAdam C, et al. Applying user-generated quality criteria to develop an Internet intervention for patients with heart disease. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14(3):124-127. [doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.003006]
36. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006 Jun; 60(6):631-637. [doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020] (Pubitemid 43786439)
37. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991;32(6):705-714.
38. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 Jun; 67(6):361-370.
39. The National Centre for Social Research, The Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Royal Free and University College Medical School. Health Survey for England 2005 URL: http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/findingData/ snDescription.asp?sn=5675 [accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lYbAwFYT]
40. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000 Jan 8; 320(7227):114-11. [FREE Full text]
41. SPSS Inc. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15 URL: http://www.spss.com/[accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lTsgCawi]
42. ATLAS.ti. Qualitative Data-Analysis Software, version 5 URL: http://www.atlasti.com/[accessed 2009-11-11] [WebCite Cache ID 5lYaijsQh]
43. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(6):255-26. [FREE Full text]
44. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, White M, et al. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med 2003 Jul. 28; 163(14):1727-173. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727] (Pubitemid 36898962)
45. Kontos EZ, Bennett GG, Viswanath K. Barriers and facilitators to home computer and internet use among urban novice computer users of low socioeconomic position. J Med Internet Res 2007;9: e2. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e31]