Engaging Across Boundaries-Emerging Practices in 'Technical Democracy'

East Asian Science, Technology and Society

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 475-482

  Du Plessis, Rosemary ^a   Hindmarsh, Richard ^b   Cronin, Karen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651270819     PISSN: 18752160     EISSN: 18752152     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12280-010-9157-7     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Beck, U. (1998). Politics of risk society. In J. Franklin (Ed.), The politics of risk society (pp. 9-22). Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Chen, D.-S., & Wu, C.-L. (2007). Introduction: Public participation in science and technology in East Asia. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 1, 15-18.
3. Corburn, J. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Cronin, K. (2008). Deliberative dialogue for sustainable biotechnology governance in New Zealand. Research Report prepared for the University of Waikato research programme on Socially and Culturally Sustainable Biotechnology in New Zealand. http://wms-soros. mngt. waikato. ac. nz/Biotechnology/Publications/default. htm, (accessed 12 November 2009).
5. de Vries, G. (2007). What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 781-809.
6. Evans, R. (2003). Searching for paradise: Landscape, utopia, and Rome. Arethusa, 36, 285-307.
7. Fujigaki, Y. (2009). STS in Japan and East Asia: Governance of science and technology and public engagement. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 3, 511-518.
8. Goven, J. (2003). Deploying the consensus conference in New Zealand: Democracy and deproblematization. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 423-440.
9. Hall, C. (2008). Identifying farmer attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) corps in Scotland: Are they pro- or anti-GM? Geoforum, 39, 204-212.
10. Hindmarsh, R. (2008). Edging towards BioUtopia: A new politics of reordering life & the democratic challenge. Crawley: University of Western Australia Press.
11. Hindmarsh, R., & Du Plessis, R. (2008). The new civic geography of life sciences governance: Perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. New Genetics and Society, 27(3), 175-180.
12. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (2008). The new genetics professionals' discursive boundaries. The Social Review, 45(2), 279-304.
14. Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759-780.
15. Mattson, D., Byrd, K., Rutherford, M., Brown, S., & Clark, T. (2006). Finding common ground in large carnivore conservation: Mapping contending perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 392-405.
16. Ozawa, C. (2005). Science in environmental conflicts. In L. King & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Environmental sociology: From analysis to action (pp. 326-338). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
17. Pidgeon, N., Harthorn, B., Bryant, K., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2009). Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(2), 95-98.
18. Rogers-Hayden, R. & Hindmarsh, R. (2002). Modernity contextualises New Zealand's Royal Commission on Genetic Modification: A discourse analysis. Journal of New Zealand Studies, NS1(1): 41-61.
19. Rogers-Hayden, T., Mohr, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2007). Introduction: Engaging with nanotechnologies: Engaging differently? Nano Ethics, 1, 123-130.
20. Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 189-220). Boulder: Westview.
21. Stern, M. (2006). Dystopian anxieties versus utopian ideals: Medicine from Frankenstein to the visible human project and body worlds. Science as Culture, 15(1), 61-84.
22. Wynne, B. (1993). Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 321-337.