The new civic geography of life sciences governance: Transitions and trajectories in Australia and New Zealand

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 175-180

  Hindmarsh, Richard ^a   Du Plessis, Rosemary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; BIOMEDICINE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DNA MODIFICATION; EDITORIAL; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GEOGRAPHY; MASS MEDIUM; NEW ZEALAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

EID: 51349119817     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: 14699915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636770802326851     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. Abels, G., 2005. The long and winding road from Asilomar to Brussels: science, politics and the public in biotechnology regulation. Science as Culture, 14 (4), 339-353.
2. Davies, P., 2004. Gene flow and genetically engineered crops. In: R. Hindmarsh and G. Lawrence, eds. Recoding nature: critical perspectives on genetic engineering. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 71-81.
3. Gottweis, H., 2002. Gene therapy and the public: a matter of trust. Gene Therapy, 9, 667-669.
4. Gottweis, H., 2005. Governing genomics in the 21st century: between risk and uncertainty. New Genetics and Society, 24 (2), 175-193.
5. Hindmarsh, R., 2008. Edging towards bioutopia: a new politics of reordering life & the democratic challenge. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.
6. Irwin, A., 2006. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36 (2), 299-320.
7. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B., eds., 1996. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Jasanoff, S., 2004. Science and citizenship: a new synergy. Science and Public Policy, 31 (2), 90-94.
9. Libatore, A. and Funtowicz, S., 2003. "Democratising" expertise, "expertising" democracy: what does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30 (3), 146-150.
10. Malatesta, M., 2002. Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analyses of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Cell Structure and Function, 27, 173-180.
11. PAGININI Project, n.d. Participatory governance and institutional innovation 2004-2007 [online]. Available from: http://www.paganini-project. net/pages_open/intro.htm [Accessed June 2007].
12. Prainsack, B. and Naue, U., 2006. Relocating health governance: personalized medicine in times of "global genes". Personalized Medicine, 3 (3), 349-355.
13. Prescott, V., et al., 2005. Transgenic expression of bean-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53 (23), 9023-9030.
14. Rose, N., 2007. The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
15. Rose, N. and Novas, C., 2005. Biological citizenship. In: A. Ong and S.J. Collier, eds. Global assemblages: technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell: Oxford, 439-463.
16. Rotmans, J., 2005. Modelling sustainability: is it possible? Dutch Research Institute for Transitions [online]. Available from: http://www.drift.eur.nl/?research=index [Accessed November 2006].
17. Satterfield, T., et al., 2005. Culture, risk, and the prospect of genetically modified organisms as viewed by Tāngata Whenua. Research Report No. 1. Faculty of Science, Te Whare Wananga o Awanuiarangi, Whakatane, New Zealand. Decision Research Report [online]. Available from: http://www.decisionresearch.org/publications/search/ [Accessed February 2008].
18. Urry, J., 2000. Sociology beyond societies. London: Routledge.
19. Urry, J., 2005. The complexity turn. Theory, Culture & Society, 22 (5), 1-14.
20. Waldby, C., 2002. Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health, 6 (3), 305-323.
21. Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R., 2006. Tissue economies: blood, organs and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
22. Williams, R. and Johnson, P., 2004. Circuits of surveillance. Surveillance Society, 2 (1), 1-14.
23. Winstanley, W., et al., 2005. From "dialogue" to "engagement"? Learning beyond cases. Cross-Case Study Learning Group Report to the Ministry of Research Science and Technology. Available from: www.morst.govt.nz/publications/a-z/cross-case-study-learning-group-report [Accessed January 2007].