Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography

Radiology

Volumn 226, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 653-661

  Yee, Judy ^a,b   Kumar, Naveen N ^a,b   Hung, Raymond K ^a,b   Akerkar, Geetanjali A ^b   Kumar, Prasanna R G ^a,b   Wall, Susan D ^a,b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon neoplasms; Colon, CT; Colonoscopy; Computed tomography (CT), image processing; Computed tomography (CT), three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COLON DILATATION; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION; TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRONE POSITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 0037371529     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2263010701     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Royster AP, Gupta AK, Fenlon HM, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: current status and future implications. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:282-288.
2. Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Radiology 1996; 200:30-31.
3. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997; 205:59-65.
4. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:989-995.
5. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1496-1503.
6. Macań M, Megibow AJ, Milano A, Berman P. CT colonography detection of colorectal polyps and neoplasms in asymptomatic patients (abstr). Eur Radiol 1999; 9:818.
7. Yee J, Akerker GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid K. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219:685-692.
8. Dachman AH, Lieberman J, Osnis RB, et al. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography. Radiology 1997; 203:427-430.
9. Beaulieu CF, Napel S, Daniel BL, et al. Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:656-663.
10. McFarland EG, Brink JA, Loh J, et al. Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colonography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. Radiology 1997; 205:701-707.
11. Karadi C, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology 1999; 212:195-201.
12. Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 1999; 212:203-212.
13. Whiting BR, McFarland EG, Brink JA. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation. Radiology 2000; 217:165-172.
14. Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:595-599.
15. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216:704-711.
16. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:169-172.
17. Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 2001; 218:274-277.
18. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73:13-22.
19. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Corcoran KE. CT colonography of the unprepared colon: an early feasibility study of "virtual preparation" (abstr). Gastroenterology 2000; 118(suppl):A1484.
20. Sheppard DG, Iyer RB, Herron D, Charnsangvej C. Subtraction CT colonography: feasibility in an animal model. Clin Radiol 1999; 54:126-132.
21. Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:646-648.
22. Morrin MM, Farell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulous V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000; 217:765-771.