Converging measures of workload capacity

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 763-771

  Eidels, Ami ^a   Donkin, Chris ^a   Brown, Scott D ^a   Heathcote, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; WORK; WORKLOAD;

ALGORITHMS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; WORK; WORKLOAD;

EID: 78651236994     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.763     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brown, S. [D.], & Heathcote, A. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychological Review, 112, 117-128.
2. Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178.
3. Donkin, C., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2009). The overconstraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem. Psy-chonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1129-1135.
4. Donkin, C., Brown, S. D., Heathcote, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different mod-els for response time, same conclusions about psychological mecha-nisms? Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Eidels, A., Townsend, J. T., & Algom, D. (2010). Comparing percep-tion of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention: Evidence for dramatic processing differences. Cognition, 114, 129-150.
6. Eidels, A., Townsend, J. T., & Pomerantz, J. R. (2008). Where simi-larity beats redundancy: The importance of context, higher order simi-larity, and response assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 1441-1463.
7. Ho, T., Brown, S., & Serences, J. (2009). Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex. Journal of Neurosci-ence, 29, 8675-8687.
8. Ludwig, C. J. H., Farrell, S., Ellis, L. A., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2009). The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 180-202.
9. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
10. Miller, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal attention in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 160-169.
11. Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction time. Transac-tions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 43, 574-590.
12. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Re-view, 85, 59-108.
13. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
14. Townsend, J. T., & Honey, C. J. (2007). Consequences of base time for redundant signals experiments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51, 242-265.
15. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial and co-active theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-360.
16. Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004). A theory of interactive paral-lel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychological Review, 111, 1003-1035.
17. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of percep-tual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
18. Van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Oberauer, K. (2009). How to use the diffu-sion model: Parameter recovery of three methods: EZ, fast-dm, and DMAT. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 463-473.
19. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Com-putational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.