Generation of MARTE allocation models from activity threads

Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering

Volumn 36 LNEE, Issue , 2009, Pages 43-56

  Liehr, Andreas W ^a   Buchenrieder, Klaus J ^b   Rolfs, Heike S ^b   Nageldinger, Ulrich ^b  

^a BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Component based system modeling; Design space exploration; UML MARTE; Unified modeling language

Indexed keywords

ALLOCATION MODEL; ARCHITECTURE MODELS; COMPONENT BASED SYSTEMS; DESIGN ALTERNATIVES; DESIGN CYCLE; DESIGN SPACE EXPLORATION; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; FUNCTION MODELS; MODELING PROCEDURE; RESOURCE MODELING; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SYSTEM MODELS; SYSTEM SPECIFICATION; UML MARTE; UNIFIED MODELING;

DESIGN; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPACE RESEARCH; SPECIFICATIONS;

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EID: 78651233697     PISSN: 18761100     EISSN: 18761119     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9714-0_3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. S. Balsamo, M. Marzolla, and R. Mirandola. Efficient performance models in componentbased software engineering. In SEAA '06 Proceedings of the 32nd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Cavtat/Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2006.
2. V. Cortellessa and R.Mirandola. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In WOSP '00: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance, pages 58-70. Assoc. Comput. Mach., New York, 2000.
3. V. Cortellessa, A. D'Ambrogio, and G. Iazeolla. Automatic derivation of software performance models from case documents. Performance Evaluation, 45(2-3):81-105, 2001. (Pubitemid 32529465)
4. C. Dumoulin, P. Boulet, J.-L. Dekeyser, and P. Marquet. UML 2.0 structure diagram for intensive signal processing application specification. Rapport de recherche 4766, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), March 2003.
5. T. Frederic, G. Sebastien, D. Jerôme, and T. François. Software real-time resource modeling. In Forum on Specification and Design Languages (FDL), Barcelona, Spain, pages 231-236. European Electronic Chips & Systems design Initiative (ECSI), September 2007.
6. G.P. Gu and D.C. Petriu. Early evaluation of software performance based on the UML performance profile. In CASCON '03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, pages 66-79. IBM Press, Indianapolis, 2003.
7. G.P. Gu and D.C. Petriu. From UML to LQN by XML algebra-based model transformations. In WOSP '05: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software and Performance, pages 99-110. Assoc. Comput. Mach., New York, 2005. (Pubitemid 44447385)
8. C. Kabajunga and R. Pooley. Simulating UML sequence diagrams. In 14th UK Performance Engineering Workshop, Edinburgh, England, pages 198-207, July 1998.
9. P. Kaehkipuro. UML-based performance modeling framework for component-based distributed systems. In Performance Engineering-State of the Art and Current Trends, LNCS 2047, pages 167-184. Springer, Berlin, 2001.
10. A.W. Liehr and K.J. Buchenrieder. Generation of related performance simulation models at an early stage in the design cycle. In 14th IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS), pages 7-14. IEEE Comput. Soc., Tucson, 2007. (Pubitemid 46900653)
11. A.W. Liehr and K.J. Buchenrieder. Performance evaluation of HW/SW-system alternatives. In Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) University Booth-Demonstration and Poster Exhibition, Munich, Germany, March 2008.
12. A.W. Liehr and K.J. Buchenrieder. An XML based simulation method for extended queuing networks. In L.S. Louca, editor, 22nd European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, pages 322-328, Nicosia, Cyprus. European Council for Modelling and Simulation, June 2008.
13. A.W. Liehr, K.J. Buchenrieder, and U. Nageldinger. Visual feedback for design-space exploration with UML MARTE. In The Fifth International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, Al Ain, UAE. IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos, 2008.
14. OMG. Mof 2.0/xmi mapping specification, v2.1. OMG Document 05-09-01, Object Management Group, September 2005.
15. OMG. The unified modeling language (UML), version 2.0. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm, July 2005.
16. OMG. Omg systems modeling language (omg sysml), v1.0. OMG Document 2007-09-01, Object Management Group, September 2007.
17. OMG. Omg unified modeling language. OMG Document 2007-11-04, Object Management Group, November 2007.
18. OMG. UML profile for MARTE. OMG Document 07-08-04, Object Management Group, August 2007.
19. D.B. Petriu and M. Woodside. Analysing software requirements specifications for performance. In WOSP '02: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software and Performance, pages 1-9. Assoc. Comput. Mach., New York, 2002.
20. D.C. Petriu and X. Wang. Deriving software performance models from architectural patterns by graph transformations. In TAGT'98: Selected Papers from the 6th International Workshop on Theory and Application of Graph Transformations, London, UK, pages 475-488. Springer, Berlin, 2000.
21. C.U. Smith. The evolution of software performance engineering: a survey. In ACM '86: Proceedings of 1986 ACM Fall Joint Computer Conference, pages 778-783. IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos, 1986.
22. S. Taha, A. Radermacher, S. Gerard, and J.-L. Dekeyser. An open framework for detailed hardware modeling. In The IEEE Second International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES), Lisbon, Portugal, vol. 1, pages 118-125. IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos, 2007.
23. M. Woodside, D.C. Petriu, D.B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer. Performance by unified model analysis (PUMA). InWOSP '05: Proceedings of the 5th InternationalWorkshop on Software and Performance, pages 1-12. Assoc. Comput. Mach., New York, 2005. (Pubitemid 44447376)