Generation of related performance simulation models at an early stage in the design cycle

Proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 7-14

  Liehr, Andreas W ^a   Buchenrieder, Klaus ^a  

^a BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUEUEING NETWORKS;

ARCHITECTURAL EXPLORATION; EXTENDED QUEUING NETWORK MODELS (EQN); SIMULATION MODELS; SOFTWARE TRADEOFF ANALYSIS;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 34250162520     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ECBS.2007.43     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Arena. Arena simulation software from rockwell automation. http://www.arenasimulation.com/, August 2006.
2. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, May 2004.
3. S. Balsamo, M. Marzolla, and R. Mirandola. Efficient performance models in component-based software engineering. In SEAA '06 Proceedings of the 32nd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Cavtat/Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2006.
4. F. Baskett, K. M. Chandy, R. R. Muntz, and F. G. Palacios. Open, closed, and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J. ACM, 22:248-260, 1975.
5. Bitmover. Lmbench - tools for performance analysis. http://www.bitmover. com/lmbench/, June 1998.
6. Cadence. Comprehensive VCC: Function/Architecture CO-Design and Design Export. Alta Group of Cadence Design Systems, June 2001.
7. V. Cortellessa, A. D'Ambrogio, and G. Iazeolla. Automatic derivation of software performance models from case documents. Performance Evaluation, 45(2-3):81-105, 2001.
8. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from uml diagrams. In WOSP '00: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Software and performance, pages 58-70, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press.
9. Debian. Debian linux homepage. http://www.debian.org/, 12 2006.
10. P. Garg, A. Gupta, and J. Rozenblit. Performance analysis of embedded systems in the virtual component co-design environment. In 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004. Proceedings, pages 61-68, May 2004.
11. H. Gomaa and D. A. Menascé. Design and performance modeling of component interconnection patterns for distributed software architectures. In WOSP '00: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on software and performance, pages 117-126, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press.
12. B. Gröne, A. Knopfel, and P. Tabeling. Component vs. component: why we need more than one definition [system component and software component]. In 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2005. ECBS '05, pages 550 - 552, April 2005.
13. G. P. Gu and D. C. Petriu. Xslt transformation from uml models to lqn performance models. In WOSP '02: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on software and performance, pages 227-234, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
14. G. P. Gu and D. C. Petriu. Early evaluation of software performance based on the uml performance profile. In GASCON '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, pages 66-79. IBM Press, 2003.
15. G. P. Gu and D. C. Petriu. From uml to lqn by xml algebra-based model transformations. In WOSP '05: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on software and performance, pages 99-110, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
16. IBM. A simple queueing network model of a time sharing system. http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/research.nsf/pages/r.performance.history.html, May 2005.
17. Intel. Intel pentium iii processor technical documentation. http://www.intel.com/design/archives/processors/-PentiumIII/index.htm, November 2006.
18. C. Kabajunga and R. Pooley. Simulating uml sequence diagrams. In Performance Engineering Workshop, UK PEW 1998, pages 198-207, 07 1998.
19. P. Kähkipuro. Uml-based performance modeling framework for component-based distributed systems. In Performance Engineering - State of the Art and Current Trends, LNCS 2047, pages 167-184, Berlin, 2001. Springer-Verlag.
20. Linux. The linux kernel archive. http://www.kernel.org, November 2006.
21. A. Musovic, R. Fischer, U. Nageldinger, K. Buchenrieder, and A. Lehmann. An eqn* based approach for high-level performance and power estimation. In Conceptual Modeling and Simulation Conference, 2005. CMS 2005. 2nd 13M International Mediterranean Modeling Multiconference, pages 193-198, 2005.
22. OMG. The unified modeling language (uml), version 2.0. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm, July 2005.
23. D. Petriu and M. Woodside. Analysing software requirements specifications for performance. In WOSP '02: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Software and performance, pages 1-9, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
24. D. C. Petriu and X. Wang. Deriving software performance models from architectural patterns by graph transformations. In TAGT'98: Selected papers from the 6th International Workshop on Theory and Application of Graph Transformations, pages 475-488, London, UK, 2000. Springer-Verlag.
25. C. H. Sauer. Approximate solution of queueing networks with simultaneous resource possession. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 25(6):894-903, 1981.
26. C. H. Sauer, E. A. MacNair, and S. Salza. A language for extended queuing network models. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 24(6):747-755, 1980.
27. C. U. Smith. The evolution of software performance engineering: a survey. In ACM '86: Proceedings of 1986 ACM Fall joint computer conference, pages 778-783, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1986. IEEE Computer Society Press.
28. Umbrello. Homepage of the umbrello uml modelling tool. http://uml.sourceforge.net/index.php, October 2006.
29. Validome. Validator for xml documents from validome. http://www.validome. org/xml/, August 2006.
30. W3C. W3c site of the extensible markup language (xml). http://www.w3.org/XML/, September 2006.
31. W3C. Xml schema. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema, October 2006.
32. J. Walker. Homepage of fast fourier transform benchmark. http://www.fourmilab.ch/fbench/ffbench.html, November 2004.
33. J. Walker. Homepage of floating point benchmarks. http://www.fourmilab. ch/fbench/, August 2005.
34. M. Woodside, D. C. Petriu, D. B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer. Performance by unified model analysis (puma). In WOSP '05: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pages 1-12, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
35. Z. Xu and A. Lehmann. Automated generation of queuing network model from uml-based software models with performance annotations. Technical Report 2002-06, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Fakultät für Informatik, Munich, Germany, September 2002.
36. Z. Xu and A. Lehmann. Extending functional models for predicting software performance during the unified software development process. In WPES' 03: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop Performance Engineering in der Softwareentwicklung, Magdeburg, Germany, 2003.
37. Z. Xu and A. Lehmann. Generating queuing network models from uml-based models for software performance prediction. In SPECTS' 04: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, San Jose, California, USA, 2004.