Evaluation of the virtual mirror as a navigational aid for augmented reality driven minimally invasive procedures

9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Science and Technology, ISMAR 2010 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 91-97

  Bichlmeier, Christoph ^a   Euler, Ekkehard ^b   Blum, Tobias ^a   Navab, Nassir ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

H.5.1 multimedia information systems : Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities; H.5.2 information interfaces and presentation : Interaction styles evaluation methodology

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; EVALUATION/METHODOLOGY; H.5.1 [MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION SYSTEMS]: ARTIFICIAL , AUGMENTED , AND VIRTUAL REALITIES; INTERACTIVE TOOL; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS; TARGET REGIONS; USER STUDY; VIRTUAL MIRROR;

AUGMENTED REALITY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INSTRUMENTS; MIRRORS; NAVIGATION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 78651083657     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643555     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. M. Bajura, H. Fuchs, and R. Ohbuchi. Merging virtual objects with the real world: seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient. In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 203-210. ACM Press, 1992.
2. C. Bichlmeier, S. M. Heining, M. Feuerstein, and N. Navab. The virtual mirror: A new interaction paradigm for augmented reality environments. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 28, 2009.
3. W. Birkfellner, M. Figl, K. Huber, F.Watzinger, F.Wanschitz, J. Hummel, R. Hanel, W. Greimel, P. Homolka, R. Ewers, and H. Bergmann. A head-mounted operating binocular for augmented reality visualization in medicine - design and initial evaluation. 21(8):991-997, 2002.
4. W. Birkfellner, M. Figl, C. Matula, J. Hummel, H. I. R Hanel, F.Wanschitz, A. Wagner, F. Watzinger, and H. Bergmann. Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted operating binocular. 48(3):N49-N57, 2003.
5. M. Blackwell, C. Nikou, A. M. D. Gioia, and T. Kanade. An image overlay system for medical data visualization. In Proceedings of the First International Conference of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), volume 1496 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 232-240, Cambridge, MA, USA, October 1998. Springer-Verlag.
6. M. Feuerstein. Augmented Reality in Laparoscopic Surgery - New Concepts for Intraoperative Multimodal Imaging. PhD thesis, 2007.
7. G. S. Fischer, A. Deguet, D. Schlattman, R. Taylor, L. Fayad, S. J. Zinreich, and G. Fichtinger. Mri image overlay: Applications to arthrography needle insertion. In 14, 2006.
8. W. A. Hoff and T. L. Vincent. Analysis of head pose accuracy in augmented reality. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6, 2000.
9. D. Kersten, P. Mamassian, and D. Knill. Moving cast shadows and the perception of relative depth, 1994.
10. A. Khamene, S. Vogt, F. Azar, T. Sielhorst, and F. Sauer. Local 3D reconstruction and augmented reality visualization of freehand ultra-sound for needle biopsy procedures. pages 344-355. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
11. A. P. King, P. J. Edwards, C. R. Maurer, Jr., D. A. de Cunha, D. J. Hawkes, D. L. G. Hill, R. P. Gaston, M. R. Fenlon, A. J. Strong, C. L. Chandler, A. Richards, and M. J. Gleeson. A system for microscope-assisted guided interventions. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, (72):107-111, 1999.
12. P. Mamassian, D. Knill, and D. Kersten. The perception of cast shadows, 1998.
13. E. Méndez, D. Kalkofen, and D. Schmalstieg. Interactive context-driven visualization tools for augmented reality. pages 209-218, 2006.
14. N. Navab, C. Bichlmeier, and T. Sielhorst. Pct patent application no. pct/ep2007/003206: Virtual penetrating mirror device for visualizing of virtual objects within an augmented reality environment, April 2006.
15. A. Park, G. Lee, F. J. Seagull, N. Meenaghan, and D. Dexter. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: An impending epidemic. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, In Press, Corrected Proof:-, 2009.
16. J. Rolland, D. Wright, , and A. Kancherla. Towards a novel augmented-reality tool to visualize dynamic 3-d anatomy. In Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pages 337-348, San Diego, California, 1997.
17. F. Sauer, A. Khamene, B. Bascle, and G. J. Rubino. A head-mounted display system for augmented reality image guidance: Towards clinical evaluation for imri-guided neurosurgery. pages 707-716, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag.
18. F. Sauer, U. J. Schoepf, A. Khamene, S. Vogt, M. Das, and S. G. Silverman. Augmented reality system for ct-guided interventions: System description and initial phantom trials. In Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, 2003.
19. B. Schwald, H. Seibert, and T. Weller. A flexible tracking concept applied to medical scenarios using an ar window. page 261, Washington, DC, USA, 2002. IEEE Computer Society.
20. T. Sielhorst, C. Bichlmeier, S. Heining, and N. Navab. Depth perception a major issue in medical ar: Evaluation study by twenty surgeons. In Proceedings of MICCAI 2006, LNCS, pages 364-372, Copenhagen, Denmark, Oct 2006. MICCAI Society, Springer.
21. T. Sielhorst, M. Feuerstein, J. Traub, O. Kutter, and N. Navab. Campar: A software framework guaranteeing quality for medical augmented reality. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 1(Supplement 1):29-30, June 2006.
22. I. Sutherland. A head-mounted three dimensional display. pages 757-764, 1968.